HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.
Wiseman wasn't the one going 1-10 or 6-18 FG like a couple of his teammates. He was his team's best player.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.

3toheadmelo wrote:Capn'O wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Both. I remember Begley saying the Knicks had to give up Mitch to make it happen.
If it was on the table straight up it's a decent deal. I still like a Hayes move up more where we keep Mitch but that likely wasn't on the table.
That’s fair. I liked Hayes too but I had Wiseman on like 5 tiers ahead of him lol. Quickley might be better than Hayes though

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.
Wiseman was easily the 2nd best player on the Warriors if you watched the game. Going by +/- we better trade RJ for TJ McConnell, or Mitch for Myles Turner.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Wiseman is going to be a 20-25ppg scorer in a few years, but hey, why trade Mitch and the 8 for that
dc wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.
Wiseman wasn't the one going 1-10 or 6-18 FG like a couple of his teammates. He was his team's best player.
robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Looks like the GSW's get to tear the Knicks heart out twice by taking the good players just ahead of them in the first round.
Glad to see nothing ever changes for the Knicks, ever.
We could probably just tank if we want to prevent this. Fact is they earned their pick by tanking and the Knicks got what we deserved by chasing several meaningless wins, as always
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid

Capn'O wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Capn'O wrote:
If it was on the table straight up it's a decent deal. I still like a Hayes move up more where we keep Mitch but that likely wasn't on the table.
That’s fair. I liked Hayes too but I had Wiseman on like 5 tiers ahead of him lol. Quickley might be better than Hayes though
Quick looks nice. That would be an absolute blessing. I've only watched his Knicks highlights still so looking forward to him coming back.
Early in the year I liked Ant-man better at 1 but he kinda fell off in interest for me.

HEZI wrote:Wiseman so much more skilled than Mitch it's not even close
HEZI wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Just want to mention that Sabonis is one of the worst match-ups for Mitch. He's the fake-master (one of Mitch's biggest weaknesses), and a post-up big which prevents Mitch from using his ability to defend in space.
Philly presents a similar challenge, and Mitch has to show up for those individual match-ups as well, but I think he will remind us how good he can be defensively against other teams.
Drummond, Sabonis, Embiid, Jokic, and the list goes on, so basically any center with offensive skills gives Mitch trouble but he will look a lot better against rim runner like himself who are limited offensively
HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Wiseman -18
Brook Lopez +14
Oh man, I love how you guys are trippin over one game.
Wiseman was easily the 2nd best player on the Warriors if you watched the game. Going by +/- we better trade RJ for TJ McConnell, or Mitch for Myles Turner.
Did Wiseman make any of his teammates better? No. Just stat packing.

Iron Mantis wrote:No team in the NBA I dislike more than the Nets.

Oscirus wrote:robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Looks like the GSW's get to tear the Knicks heart out twice by taking the good players just ahead of them in the first round.
Glad to see nothing ever changes for the Knicks, ever.
We could probably just tank if we want to prevent this. Fact is they earned their pick by tanking and the Knicks got what we deserved by chasing several meaningless wins, as always
Warriors didnt tank, they legit sucked last year.
Capn'O wrote:Well, Durant's still good.
Chanel Bomber wrote:HEZI wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Just want to mention that Sabonis is one of the worst match-ups for Mitch. He's the fake-master (one of Mitch's biggest weaknesses), and a post-up big which prevents Mitch from using his ability to defend in space.
Philly presents a similar challenge, and Mitch has to show up for those individual match-ups as well, but I think he will remind us how good he can be defensively against other teams.
Drummond, Sabonis, Embiid, Jokic, and the list goes on, so basically any center with offensive skills gives Mitch trouble but he will look a lot better against rim runner like himself who are limited offensively
The list isn't that long though. There are like 5 potent post-up bigs in the NBA.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Wiseman was easily the 2nd best player on the Warriors if you watched the game. Going by +/- we better trade RJ for TJ McConnell, or Mitch for Myles Turner.
Did Wiseman make any of his teammates better? No. Just stat packing.
Make his teammates better? What is this 2004? You can't make anyone better than they are.
LeBron missed the playoffs last year, is he incapable of "making his teammates better" or were his teammates just not good? Holding a rookie big to the standard of winning in his 2nd game is crazy.