god shammgod wrote:
#1 pick in the draft incoming for GSW
Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

3toheadmelo wrote:I’d love to take a flyer on Nas Little
god shammgod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:I’d love to take a flyer on Nas Little
if you were portland would you take frank or dennis ? alright then.

thebuzzardman wrote:cgf wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
No way I was suggesting Hunter or Huerter, who look like future pieces for the Hawks, while I'm not sure Reddish is really in their plans.
Other than to move him at some point.
And someone mentioned "Oh, they play him over Gallo".
Gallo is hurt and also is a pure PF at this point in his career.
Their organization seems to view that trio similarly, and though (at least) one will ultimately end up trade bait, none are players they seem in any rush to get rid of. Basically, I don't think any of them will be available for a prospect swap but any of them could be available in a trade that consolidates some of their pieces into a clear upgrade...and which ones they'd be willing to move would depend on that upgrade.
So unless we're selling RJ or Julius becomes a perennial Allstar contender...or we can weasel our way into a 3 team deal that gets them someone like Beal...we don't have the right kind of bait to steal any of their young wings.
I'd agree with that.
I mean, I know Hunter was best available, and Huerter a good value pick where they got him, but the Hawks, to me, sent a message not unlike the one Frank is getting, where they made a point of running out and signing a guard/SF in Bog Bog. Then again, they may view him like Knox, like a real 3/4 year project.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
cgf wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:cgf wrote:
Their organization seems to view that trio similarly, and though (at least) one will ultimately end up trade bait, none are players they seem in any rush to get rid of. Basically, I don't think any of them will be available for a prospect swap but any of them could be available in a trade that consolidates some of their pieces into a clear upgrade...and which ones they'd be willing to move would depend on that upgrade.
So unless we're selling RJ or Julius becomes a perennial Allstar contender...or we can weasel our way into a 3 team deal that gets them someone like Beal...we don't have the right kind of bait to steal any of their young wings.
I'd agree with that.
I mean, I know Hunter was best available, and Huerter a good value pick where they got him, but the Hawks, to me, sent a message not unlike the one Frank is getting, where they made a point of running out and signing a guard/SF in Bog Bog. Then again, they may view him like Knox, like a real 3/4 year project.
That's different. We put any garbage we could find in Frank's way, they just went crazy grabbing too many of the "best available" FAs because they panicked when Trae started talking about the playoffs.

thebuzzardman wrote:cgf wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
I'd agree with that.
I mean, I know Hunter was best available, and Huerter a good value pick where they got him, but the Hawks, to me, sent a message not unlike the one Frank is getting, where they made a point of running out and signing a guard/SF in Bog Bog. Then again, they may view him like Knox, like a real 3/4 year project.
That's different. We put any garbage we could find in Frank's way, they just went crazy grabbing too many of the "best available" FAs because they panicked when Trae started talking about the playoffs.
Again, valid. It ties into my thought that they view Reddish as a longer term project and went for some "win now" wing help.
Which I can't disagree with, because they had a ton of youth with how the drafted, but at some point a team has to consolidate some of that, though they let a few lower drafted guys go etc.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
KnicksGod wrote:YungKnicks wrote:KnicksGod wrote:
I’m talking about 44 points in a blowout loss and a backboard dunk is not the stuff of greatness, it’s Jamal Crawford stuff.
I do think Ja is really good but you and I part if you think 44 points in a blowout loss is anything to be all hot & heavy about with your silly taunting post.
Taunting??? I really want to know who else thinks this is taunting? Really man you always so sensitive.. you always replying on my post but don't want me to say anything that you may not like. Last post we went back and forth and you called it trolling. Im good.
Bro you win. +10000 for you... smh
Thanks. I do win because the Knicks could never is a taunt about something ridiculous. The Grizzlies lost the game handily.
Even Ja would pick a W and 12 points over his backboard dunk. So yeah you’re wrong.
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:I'm so happy the Celtics didn't make a run for Christian Wood, but I'm furious we didn't even think of going after him.
I gotta apologize to you and HEZI. Wood is nice.
Am still happy with the new and improved Randle though


thebuzzardman wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
He certainly had a lot of fans here. Welp
Knicks apparently needed Noel/Burks/Rivers a LOT more.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

dakomish23 wrote:KG - your boy Brunson making some great plays. Saved a turnover off a bad pass by THJ and turned it into a 3. Then hit a jumper then set up WCS for the for an alley
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
3toheadmelo wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:I'm so happy the Celtics didn't make a run for Christian Wood, but I'm furious we didn't even think of going after him.
I gotta apologize to you and HEZI. Wood is nice.
Am still happy with the new and improved Randle though
dakomish23 wrote:Richardson really getting to show off more of his game with this Carlisle offense. Perfect fit.
WCS still not anywhere near as impactful as he was at KY
They do this a lot. Come out in a flurry, take their foot off the gas and lose the game in crunch time. Not sure they’ve learned how to keep these big leads.