ImageImageImageImageImage

The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

Mark_83
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,811
And1: 3,867
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#261 » by Mark_83 » Fri Jan 8, 2021 1:50 am

PrinceAli wrote:AD in college was 6’10” with a 7’6” wingspan, 220 lbs

Mobley is 7’ with a 7’5” wingspan, 215 lbs

Physically they are very close. Talent wise I could see it but still to be seen. An intriguing prospect for sure

Don't forget though that AD was a guard up until about his junior year of high school when he had a growth spurt. He had guard skills and coordination. Mobley, as far as I know, has always been a big.
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,247
And1: 39,748
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#262 » by Bruin » Fri Jan 8, 2021 1:56 am

Mark_83 wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:AD in college was 6’10” with a 7’6” wingspan, 220 lbs

Mobley is 7’ with a 7’5” wingspan, 215 lbs

Physically they are very close. Talent wise I could see it but still to be seen. An intriguing prospect for sure

Don't forget though that AD was a guard up until about his junior year of high school when he had a growth spurt. He had guard skills and coordination. Mobley, as far as I know, has always been a big.

Yeah that’s true. Although he hasn’t had guard experience though, Mobley still looks pretty damn fluid for his size and looks like a pretty good playmaker. Seems to see the floor pretty nicely too. He’s probably the biggest project out of the top 5 guys but his potential is really high
Image
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,247
And1: 39,748
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#263 » by Bruin » Fri Jan 8, 2021 1:57 am

Mobley is about to play against Arizona in about 5 minutes btw. And Suggs is playing right now
Image
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,425
And1: 26,590
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#264 » by tdotrep2 » Fri Jan 8, 2021 2:11 am

PrinceAli wrote:Mobley is about to play against Arizona in about 5 minutes btw. And Suggs is playing right now

tel us how thye do
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,247
And1: 39,748
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#265 » by Bruin » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:03 am

tdotrep2 wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:Mobley is about to play against Arizona in about 5 minutes btw. And Suggs is playing right now

tel us how thye do

Watched the first half of Mobley. He needs to be a lot more aggressive in getting the ball. Only has 1 field goal made so far but made 5 free throws. He had a nice drive that caught my eye where he caught the ball at the top of the key on an inbounds and drove in hard to attack the rim and tried to dunk on someone but got fouled. He moves really well but needs to be more assertive

His team doesn’t seem to utilize him very well to find him in the right spots.

Defensively he alters a lot of shots at the rim. Even if he’s not getting the block, he’s forcing misses and putting a lot of pressure.
Image
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,972
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#266 » by Metallikid » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:12 am

You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.
User avatar
JShuttlesworth
RealGM
Posts: 10,213
And1: 13,420
Joined: Dec 09, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#267 » by JShuttlesworth » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:48 am

If we finish 10th (for example) and win the play in games, do we get a lottery pick or do we get the pick as if we finished 8th?
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,247
And1: 39,748
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#268 » by Bruin » Fri Jan 8, 2021 4:04 am

Mobley finished the game with 19 and 10
Image
User avatar
Morse Code
Head Coach
Posts: 6,536
And1: 8,551
Joined: May 20, 2011
Location: Halifax
     

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#269 » by Morse Code » Fri Jan 8, 2021 7:02 am

Metallikid wrote:You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.

Especially if we trade them all for Nikola Vucevic lol
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,972
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#270 » by Metallikid » Fri Jan 8, 2021 7:26 am

Morse Code wrote:
Metallikid wrote:You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.

Especially if we trade them all for Nikola Vucevic lol


I don't hear any bets being proposed.
HoopAndTheHarm
Pro Prospect
Posts: 967
And1: 647
Joined: May 24, 2006
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#271 » by HoopAndTheHarm » Fri Jan 8, 2021 9:41 am

Has anyone seen the high school kid who has yet to commit for next year, Chet Holmgren? Rated #1 high school recruit by ESPN and just about everyone else.
7'1" 195 (I think that's being generous on the weight). Makes Shawn Bradley and Manute Bol look like linebackers.
I've got a belt on that's holding up my pants and my pants have belt loops that hold up my belt. I don't know what's really happening down there. Who is the real hero? - Mitch Hedberg
God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,363
And1: 11,614
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
   

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#272 » by God Squad » Fri Jan 8, 2021 9:56 am

Metallikid wrote:You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.

I'd be willing to take that bet. Where do you see the raptors ranked or record at the end of the season.
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,972
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#273 » by Metallikid » Fri Jan 8, 2021 9:59 am

God Squad wrote:
Metallikid wrote:You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.

I'd be willing to take that bet. Where do you see the raptors ranked or record at the end of the season.


I see them being around .500%. That's nowhere near a top 5 pick.
God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,363
And1: 11,614
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
   

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#274 » by God Squad » Fri Jan 8, 2021 10:02 am

Metallikid wrote:
God Squad wrote:
Metallikid wrote:You guys are sad. I'll bet anyone here we will not get a top 5 pick.

I'd be willing to take that bet. Where do you see the raptors ranked or record at the end of the season.


I see them being around .500%. That's nowhere near a top 5 pick.

Being .500 makes you happy as a Raptor fan? I'll take the bet because I see moves being made to make sure we bottom out and if we don't make moves I just see a lackluster roster without any cohesion.
User avatar
T-d0t
General Manager
Posts: 8,978
And1: 13,141
Joined: Nov 08, 2012
Location: T-dot
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#275 » by T-d0t » Fri Jan 8, 2021 2:09 pm

God Squad wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
God Squad wrote:I'd be willing to take that bet. Where do you see the raptors ranked or record at the end of the season.


I see them being around .500%. That's nowhere near a top 5 pick.

Being .500 makes you happy as a Raptor fan? I'll take the bet because I see moves being made to make sure we bottom out and if we don't make moves I just see a lackluster roster without any cohesion.
I think Raptors FO will not let this team be .500

They are letting this play out right now but I would bet that players on this team are going to start being showcased and eventually traded.
Mr. Perfect
Analyst
Posts: 3,445
And1: 1,651
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#276 » by Mr. Perfect » Fri Jan 8, 2021 2:18 pm

Mark_83 wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:AD in college was 6’10” with a 7’6” wingspan, 220 lbs

Mobley is 7’ with a 7’5” wingspan, 215 lbs

Physically they are very close. Talent wise I could see it but still to be seen. An intriguing prospect for sure

Don't forget though that AD was a guard up until about his junior year of high school when he had a growth spurt. He had guard skills and coordination. Mobley, as far as I know, has always been a big.


No comparison between the two. AD was the best big man prospect since Tim Duncan. He straight up dominated from day 1 and led Kentucky to a national title. Mobley looks like a project for sure, still maybe 2-3 years way.
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 19,130
And1: 11,369
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#277 » by tecumseh18 » Fri Jan 8, 2021 2:42 pm

T-d0t wrote:
God Squad wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
I see them being around .500%. That's nowhere near a top 5 pick.

Being .500 makes you happy as a Raptor fan? I'll take the bet because I see moves being made to make sure we bottom out and if we don't make moves I just see a lackluster roster without any cohesion.
I think Raptors FO will not let this team be .500

They are letting this play out right now but I would bet that players on this team are going to start being showcased and eventually traded.


Oh, I'm quite sure the showcasing has already started. But it won't be for better players/superstars, unless Houston decides they'll take Lowry + picks back for Harden.

Now, as Masai well knows, it's hard to predict the results of trade. The Rudy Gay trade could easily have been a tank move (Colangelo certainly thought so at the time), but it gave us a bench and cleared the way for an efficient offence led by DeMar and Kyle (and JV). It's at least possible that trading Kyle for spare parts and picks would have a similar effect, and end up being a net benefit (the Raps were 12-2 without Kyle last season).
Marty_Budda
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,743
And1: 2,802
Joined: Aug 06, 2018
     

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#278 » by Marty_Budda » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:13 pm

tecumseh18 wrote:
T-d0t wrote:
God Squad wrote:Being .500 makes you happy as a Raptor fan? I'll take the bet because I see moves being made to make sure we bottom out and if we don't make moves I just see a lackluster roster without any cohesion.
I think Raptors FO will not let this team be .500

They are letting this play out right now but I would bet that players on this team are going to start being showcased and eventually traded.


Oh, I'm quite sure the showcasing has already started. But it won't be for better players/superstars, unless Houston decides they'll take Lowry + picks back for Harden.

Now, as Masai well knows, it's hard to predict the results of trade. The Rudy Gay trade could easily have been a tank move (Colangelo certainly thought so at the time), but it gave us a bench and cleared the way for an efficient offence led by DeMar and Kyle (and JV). It's at least possible that trading Kyle for spare parts and picks would have a similar effect, and end up being a net benefit (the Raps were 12-2 without Kyle last season).


I don’t think we play better without Kyle though. Gay’s efficiency was terrible on high volume and he wasn’t really a great defender. Kyles the exact opposite. And his plus minus stats show it.

I think if we trade Kyle for picks and lesser players (and I think we should) it’ll be a huge indicator that the FO is looking to tank this year.
tecumseh18
RealGM
Posts: 19,130
And1: 11,369
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: Big green house
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#279 » by tecumseh18 » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:23 pm

Marty_Budda wrote:
tecumseh18 wrote:
T-d0t wrote:I think Raptors FO will not let this team be .500

They are letting this play out right now but I would bet that players on this team are going to start being showcased and eventually traded.


Oh, I'm quite sure the showcasing has already started. But it won't be for better players/superstars, unless Houston decides they'll take Lowry + picks back for Harden.

Now, as Masai well knows, it's hard to predict the results of trade. The Rudy Gay trade could easily have been a tank move (Colangelo certainly thought so at the time), but it gave us a bench and cleared the way for an efficient offence led by DeMar and Kyle (and JV). It's at least possible that trading Kyle for spare parts and picks would have a similar effect, and end up being a net benefit (the Raps were 12-2 without Kyle last season).


I don’t think we play better without Kyle though. Gay’s efficiency was terrible on high volume and he wasn’t really a great defender. Kyles the exact opposite. And his plus minus stats show it.

I think if we trade Kyle for picks and lesser players (and I think we should) it’ll be a huge indicator that the FO is looking to tank this year.


It's not Kyle's fault, but having a small guard lineup when the rest of the league is loading up on big guards and wings who can shoot the 3 is a recipe for disaster. They just shoot over us. If Lonzo Ball is a dead-eye 3-point shooter, then the Raps are gonna lose to the Pels every damn time.

Lowry is still a plus player, although he is declining. But Lowry + Fred is not a plus lineup, especially (it seems) late in games.
Marty_Budda
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,743
And1: 2,802
Joined: Aug 06, 2018
     

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#280 » by Marty_Budda » Fri Jan 8, 2021 3:37 pm

tecumseh18 wrote:
Marty_Budda wrote:
tecumseh18 wrote:
Oh, I'm quite sure the showcasing has already started. But it won't be for better players/superstars, unless Houston decides they'll take Lowry + picks back for Harden.

Now, as Masai well knows, it's hard to predict the results of trade. The Rudy Gay trade could easily have been a tank move (Colangelo certainly thought so at the time), but it gave us a bench and cleared the way for an efficient offence led by DeMar and Kyle (and JV). It's at least possible that trading Kyle for spare parts and picks would have a similar effect, and end up being a net benefit (the Raps were 12-2 without Kyle last season).


I don’t think we play better without Kyle though. Gay’s efficiency was terrible on high volume and he wasn’t really a great defender. Kyles the exact opposite. And his plus minus stats show it.

I think if we trade Kyle for picks and lesser players (and I think we should) it’ll be a huge indicator that the FO is looking to tank this year.


It's not Kyle's fault, but having a small guard lineup when the rest of the league is loading up on big guards and wings who can shoot the 3 is a recipe for disaster. They just shoot over us. If Lonzo Ball is a dead-eye 3-point shooter, then the Raps are gonna lose to the Pels every damn time.

Lowry is still a plus player, although he is declining. But Lowry + Fred is not a plus lineup, especially (it seems) late in games.


I get where you’re coming from and I kind of agree. However to me that small backcourt of Fred and Kyle is still better than what it would be if we trade Kyle and plug in norm or if we trade for anyone that’s not a superstar.

We were the second seed last year with that back court and on pace to win 60. Against most teams the backcourt is fine. But it’s against long teams like Boston and philly that they have problems.

The main reason we’re 1-6 this season is the horrible center rotation we have. I don’t think there’s any way we improve if we trade Kyle unless a superstar comes our way.

Return to Toronto Raptors