iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.
Yep. No need for a splashy panicky move. Though I would like another 3-D player.
Moderators: Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, bwgood77, zimpy27, cupcakesnake
iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.
Pythagoras wrote:iamworthy wrote::lol: Lakers will be fine as is.
Yep. No need for a splashy panicky move. Though I would like another 3-D player.
LakersSoul wrote:Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.
Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
The problem is there is only 1 ball and all 3 need the ball in their hands. Image the ego battles between Kyrie and Harden then KD does his passive aggressive stuff.
What a circus that will become. Who is going to play D and who is going to defend the rim now? The loss of Allen is HUGE!!
r0drig0lac wrote:no doubt, or at least try to reduce the loss of Howard / Javale, I think they lost a lot of size and that could make a difference in the playoffs
Yeah!Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.
Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
zeebneeb wrote:Yeah!Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.
Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
If they(Nets)can hold teams to 130, they should win the majority of their games.
zeebneeb wrote:Yeah!Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.
Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
If they(Nets)can hold teams to 130, they should win the majority of their games.
That's the joke.gifFNQ wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Yeah!Catchall wrote:Can't ignore the fact that the Nets have three of the top-10 offensive players in the league if they gel.
Also can't ignore that the Lakers have limited trade assets.
If they(Nets)can hold teams to 130, they should win the majority of their games.
We had Curry/Klay/KD and we still needed to play defense, and did. Diminishing returns is absolutely a thing
r0drig0lac wrote:no doubt, or at least try to reduce the loss of Howard / Javale, I think they lost a lot of size and that could make a difference in the playoffs
zeebneeb wrote:That's the joke.gifFNQ wrote:zeebneeb wrote:Yeah!
If they(Nets)can hold teams to 130, they should win the majority of their games.
We had Curry/Klay/KD and we still needed to play defense, and did. Diminishing returns is absolutely a thing
Damn man.
You know what, your right. I sometimes forget the general board is hot take city at times.FNQ wrote:zeebneeb wrote:That's the joke.gifFNQ wrote:
We had Curry/Klay/KD and we still needed to play defense, and did. Diminishing returns is absolutely a thing
Damn man.
lol dont blame me, look around, thats an actual take around here
levon wrote:r0drig0lac wrote:no doubt, or at least try to reduce the loss of Howard / Javale, I think they lost a lot of size and that could make a difference in the playoffs
What if I told you that blocks are up and shots at the rim are being deterred at a higher rate this year? Also that opp fg% at the rim is down this year?
Han Solo wrote:The Lakers will probably get Derrick Rose at the deadline. That’s my guess this year. Think it finally gets done.
Lakers are built to compete with anyone. Anything else they add is a luxury.