Reign23 wrote:oh and another positive:
our star-rookie played 10 minutes and almost hit a shot!
That almost dunk was exciting!
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Reign23 wrote:oh and another positive:
our star-rookie played 10 minutes and almost hit a shot!
prophet_of_rage wrote:You would add Lavine t9 Randle not exchange them.thebuzzardman wrote:So, what's a realistic trade for Zach LaVine that doesn't treadmill the team by trading away too much?
I don't think there is one.
Randle and the Mav's 2021?
I don't think the Bulls have any use for Randle. How soon could he traded FROM the Bulls?
- Where the Bulls double down on a return, getting the pick from the Knicks and then flip Randle again for something. Just speculation
Obviously, this really doesn't make the Knicks better, hurts frontcourt depth, removes their best (for what it's worth) player, but it does add a quality 2/3 with some secondary/tertiary PG skills.
And since the Knicks struggle to find any one guard/wing on any night that can score consistently, at least LaVine would provide that, while RJ and Quickley have their inconsistent scoring nights, consistent with young 2nd and 1st year players who are decent.
Don't think there is a path to LaVine unless the Bulls wanted to clear cap space, which not sure they do.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk

prophet_of_rage wrote:Or just don't go on a wild set of hot takes and lame troll posts. You kbow, be unKnicksboardian.thebuzzardman wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:Quickley was also playing Dptson at point guard. I mean Jesus Andre Drummond was handling the ball for them ... successfully.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
True. Payton should be getting 44 mpg. He's the best.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk

spree2kawhi wrote:NY Knicka wrote:Watching Obi then looking at Haliburton stats truly hurts
UNLIKE Obi, Knox and Frank, Haliburton has been put into an important role from the start of his first season. Ten games in he's playing meaningful and consistent minutes with the ball actually in his hands.
Years later, Frank and Knox still have to be scared to mess up a rotation and be benched. I hope it's not the same with Obip, but as long as Randle is here it isn't looking good .......
We should trade Randle, then:
Quickley + Frank
RJ
Knox + Frank
Obi
Mitch
Management also keeps changing every two years. So there's no direction to put these players in a role. Frank was drafted for the triangle. Knox drafted to be in Thibs free flowing offence, RJ to be a transition guy and now in Thibs half court high post offence.knicksNOTslick wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:NY Knicka wrote:Watching Obi then looking at Haliburton stats truly hurts
UNLIKE Obi, Knox and Frank, Haliburton has been put into an important role from the start of his first season. Ten games in he's playing meaningful and consistent minutes with the ball actually in his hands.
Years later, Frank and Knox still have to be scared to mess up a rotation and be benched. I hope it's not the same with Obip, but as long as Randle is here it isn't looking good .......
We should trade Randle, then:
Quickley + Frank
RJ
Knox + Frank
Obi
Mitch
Knox played way too many minutes than he deserved his rookie year. It was his 2nd year where he got sporadic minutes and he regressed. We never developed him right though.
Frank played minutes but they were inconsistent and he got hurt so often that he always had a set back after showing flashes. He would then revert back to being passive which is frustrating. But the coaches should've given him a bigger role right away instead of signing all these one year vets.
It's not only just minutes given. I just think the Knicks have never provided enough guidance for our lottery picks. It's not enough to just give them minutes but seems our team never gives them a set role and invest in them. Fizdale was horrible because he was more about a free flowing offense which is good if you have the right personnel, bad if you don't have the right PG or you have young players still learning. But the main thing is... management keeps signing these rental players instead of riding with our lotto picks. Why draft them if you're gonna hinder their development.
KnicksChamps wrote:So uhhh...what the F U C K does Bullock do that Knox doesn't do infinitely better, with infinitely higher upside, with an infinitely more important future with this team?
Why the F U C K is Payton still on this god damn team, and how is IQ not outplaying him in practice daily?
RJ really messed up but I appreciated that he took it to the rim all game. Big difference. Imagine how consistently he'd be able to do that if Knox and IQ played alongside him to space the floor...
Its on Thibs now. Cut the bullshyt. Its over. Bench those two imbeciles and start the future.
FKF wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:NY Knicka wrote:Watching Obi then looking at Haliburton stats truly hurts
UNLIKE Obi, Knox and Frank, Haliburton has been put into an important role from the start of his first season. Ten games in he's playing meaningful and consistent minutes with the ball actually in his hands.
Years later, Frank and Knox still have to be scared to mess up a rotation and be benched. I hope it's not the same with Obip, but as long as Randle is here it isn't looking good .......
We should trade Randle, then:
Quickley + Frank
RJ
Knox + Frank
Obi
Mitch
This lineup doesn’t win any games. .
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
mpharris36 wrote:the austin rivers shine really wore off really quick...lol
F N 11 wrote:Knox looks good. Happy he’s finding himself. 44% from 3 438% from the field and 75% from the line. He needs more burn. Nothing else has to be said about IQ. Burkes is the only 3 that deserves to start over Knox.
Triple C wrote:
HEZI wrote:Knox should start now that there are some healthy bodies back.


