ImageImage

GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,684
And1: 3,173
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#521 » by jimmybones » Sun Jan 17, 2021 5:19 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Defensive foundation is looking strong with Clark (25)/Gary (23)/Jaire (23)/Savage (23). Even Za'darius is still only 28. King likely gone so will need another corner. Still be in the hunt for an upgrade at ILB if one is there too, but at least have a few guys to look at in Barnes/Martin.


Yeah, I love that foundation - Clark and Jaire are already elite and Gary/Savage have the tools to be as well. Always need more corners but I'd like to add another big body on the DL that can wreak a little havoc. One more DT/DL big body to pair with Clark on the interior with Gary and Z on the edges would be a dream front.

Also - big shout Elgton Jenkins, love that guy! Pretty absurd that you can lose Bakh and play that defensive front that effectively.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,530
And1: 20,230
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#522 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sun Jan 17, 2021 5:28 pm

jimmybones wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:Defensive foundation is looking strong with Clark (25)/Gary (23)/Jaire (23)/Savage (23). Even Za'darius is still only 28. King likely gone so will need another corner. Still be in the hunt for an upgrade at ILB if one is there too, but at least have a few guys to look at in Barnes/Martin.


Yeah, I love that foundation - Clark and Jaire are already elite and Gary/Savage have the tools to be as well. Always need more corners but I'd like to add another big body on the DL that can wreak a little havoc. One more DT/DL big body to pair with Clark on the interior with Gary and Z on the edges would be a dream front.

Also - big shout Elgton Jenkins, love that guy! Pretty absurd that you can lose Bakh and play that defensive front that effectively.
I'm cool adding to the dline this off-season but let's not forget Keke who looks like a player. I probably wouldn't go 1st round with that pick unless some absolute stud fell because the pack play mostly 2 down lineman so there isn't a ton of snaps to be had.

Jenkins is an absolute stud, if they redrafted that class right now he goes top half of round 1. Whatever the Packers are doing scouting, evaluating, and coaching on the oline they need to continue because they have absolutely nailed it with that position group.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,653
And1: 1,885
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#523 » by Treebeard » Sun Jan 17, 2021 5:31 pm

I'll give Billy Turner some kudos too. He's been a Swiss Army Knife and performing pretty well wherever he's been asked to play.
*******************************************************
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,540
And1: 54,787
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#524 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:17 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,093
And1: 9,736
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#525 » by crkone » Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:18 pm

I hope we get good news for Dillon. He was in some pain.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,530
And1: 20,230
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#526 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:37 pm

crkone wrote:I hope we get good news for Dillon. He was in some pain.
I was worried he might have broke his leg after seeing the replay and his instant reaction. But they let him walk off and I'd assume if it was a break we would have heard about it by now. He might have just took a shot to a bad spot and it's no more than a scare and a bruised quad.

Speaking of RBs Jones was obviously great but man Jamal Williams ran with some violence yesterday. Dude was making the d earn every tackle.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
MoreTrife
Head Coach
Posts: 6,737
And1: 2,519
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
     

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#527 » by MoreTrife » Sun Jan 17, 2021 6:56 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
crkone wrote:I hope we get good news for Dillon. He was in some pain.
I was worried he might have broke his leg after seeing the replay and his instant reaction. But they let him walk off and I'd assume if it was a break we would have heard about it by now. He might have just took a shot to a bad spot and it's no more than a scare and a bruised quad.

Speaking of RBs Jones was obviously great but man Jamal Williams ran with some violence yesterday. Dude was making the d earn every tackle.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


100%. When he was in in short yardage after awhile I knew it'd be a first down.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,653
And1: 1,885
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#528 » by Treebeard » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:05 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:
Read on Twitter


Barnes was a gamer yesterday. That hand had to hurt like hell everytime he made contact, but he powered through. Still, I think the inability to close his hand played a role in the one Ram touchdown (Barnes had a hold of Akers, but couldn't wrap him up well), and of course, it likely impacted the near interception.
*******************************************************
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#529 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:36 pm

Hope the Rams didn’t uncover a flaw in our defense going uptempo against us that a better offense could exploit.

Hopefully we learned/are learning how to deal with it a little better.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,093
And1: 9,736
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#530 » by crkone » Sun Jan 17, 2021 8:44 pm

thomchatt3rton wrote:Hope the Rams didn’t uncover a flaw in our defense going uptempo against us that a better offense could exploit.

Hopefully we learned/are learning how to deal with it a little better.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
It's dangerous because if you go three and out you put your defense right back out there with barely any time to rest. I think the Packers can manage it if they put a better package out there. They were stuck in base for quite a bit of it.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,530
And1: 20,230
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#531 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sun Jan 17, 2021 9:09 pm

crkone wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:Hope the Rams didn’t uncover a flaw in our defense going uptempo against us that a better offense could exploit.

Hopefully we learned/are learning how to deal with it a little better.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
It's dangerous because if you go three and out you put your defense right back out there with barely any time to rest. I think the Packers can manage it if they put a better package out there. They were stuck in base for quite a bit of it.
I thought on both those drives the Rams just took what the pack gave them (short passing) and that's basically what the pack have been giving all season so I don't know if that really gave away any secrets. Kind of interesting the Rams D seemed to be playing the same strategy.

The rams didn't exactly turn Geoff loose but they played a pretty clean game on O. Was kind of impressive the pack only gave up 18 while not being aided by offensive mistakes.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#532 » by thomchatt3rton » Sun Jan 17, 2021 9:48 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
crkone wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:Hope the Rams didn’t uncover a flaw in our defense going uptempo against us that a better offense could exploit.

Hopefully we learned/are learning how to deal with it a little better.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
It's dangerous because if you go three and out you put your defense right back out there with barely any time to rest. I think the Packers can manage it if they put a better package out there. They were stuck in base for quite a bit of it.
I thought on both those drives the Rams just took what the pack gave them (short passing) and that's basically what the pack have been giving all season so I don't know if that really gave away any secrets. Kind of interesting the Rams D seemed to be playing the same strategy.

The rams didn't exactly turn Geoff loose but they played a pretty clean game on O. Was kind of impressive the pack only gave up 18 while not being aided by offensive mistakes.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


You both make good points. I guess it just seems like our D is a little less reliable, a little more porous, in hurry-up situations—look at end of halves, for example, where it seems like we give up quick scores easily. Our D invites teams to take their time moving down the field, and in that way, we dictate pace to our advantage (seemingly). Hurry-up gets us out of our groove (and also could give teams more possessions i guess). But crkone is right- maybe too big a chance it could backfire.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,335
And1: 4,144
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: GT: Rams at Packers - 3:35 - Fox 

Post#533 » by BUCKnation » Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:59 pm

Seems like after every game, even if they play pretty well, MLF is talking about being upset with some form of scheming for the defense. Could definitely see Pettine let go, even with and owl.

Return to Green Bay Packers