Squigglepuffin wrote:Harrison Barnes???
That's a terrible idea tbh. Don't succumb to group-think.
There are players on cheaper non-rookie contracts who can give you at least close to as much as harrison barnes.
The guy is no where, and I mean NO WHERE close to being worth the contract he's on.
Treating the idea of trading for Barnes as if its a good idea is to me one fuelled by some degree of desperation. How high a degree I'm not sure but emotion is clearly clouding logic.
Barnes is not a guy that puts us over the top.
You might say, "But he's the only one we have a realistic chance of aquiring."
His salary would cripple us long term and imo he doesn't really move the needle. Its a move we would come to regret.
If the only way we can improve the roster this season is by aquiring a mediocre player on a bloated contract and as far as I'm aware a contract that lasts for another 2 seasons (bad) its best to just suck it up, accept the roster can't be improved this season and just roll with the guys we've got.
A big selling point of Barnes is that his salary wouldn't cripple the team. He's under contract for 2 more years after this one, so he's a FA in 2023 along with Kemba. Which, as you've probably heard, is the pivotal offeason with regard to the Jays, and only time that the Celtics could potentially participate in Free Agency.
So yeah, you don't have the option to "just suck it up" and not use the TPE, which is your only avenue to add to the team. You have to find a veteran who can improve the team's competitive prospects, and hope that internal improvement does the rest. "Sucking it up" is a major risk to take. If the team doesn't get better, then Brown and/or Tatum leave to play somewhere else. And you can raise a banner that says DIDN'T OVERPAY A VETERAN FROM 2021-2023.