Fischella wrote:bwgood77 wrote:TouchPassDario wrote:
No, my post was wrong. Burns and Gambo didn’t know a thing, believe it or not! Silver picks replacement and it is any position in the conference.
I think he will pick Booker again. It's kind of hard to argue with the picks...between Paul it was close. I was thinking he should have made it over Zion, but pulling up Zion's #s and looking, they are impressive.
I'm a little surprised if the coaches respect Booker though, that they wouldn't take him over Zion...you'd think they'd wait a little bit for younger players.
Seems like the only other possibility might be DeRozan, who has pretty similar #s to Book (fewer points but almost double the assists, more boards, similar TS%), but Book is on the better team and seems to be who the players want (obvious by their voting too).
I think Sabonis might be the biggest snub though. The guy is averaging 21.5, 11.6, 5.7, 1, .7, with a 60% TS%. Easily the best player on 4th seed and they got no one. Probably the best passing big man next to Jokic..but great all around.
Hard to argue with east picks though. He would surely be the injury replacement in the east if there was one.
Trae and Bam are the biggest snubs, including the West, they should have been in over Randle and Vuc
Booker surely will make it in for AD, but to me he didn't cut it as it stood now, Zion's season has just been that impressive and the Pels are mediocre but not bottom of the barrel sucky, they are going to win the equivalent of 38 games or so
Zion's numbers are good but they are not better than Bookers last year and the year before when he missed out because "we were a losing team".
Anyway, I just feel for book because it's a legacy thing. It's all well and good for him to prove people wrong but at the end of his career, 3 time all star doesnt have the same ring as 8-10 time all star. And you know people who make all star teams regularly get preference for getting voted back year on year, so I fear once you fall of the wagon its hard to get back on consistently






















