Ben-N1ce wrote:I'd take KO back. Upgrade in talent. That's all they can do. I can't imagine LMA or Drummond picking the Celtics over Heat/Lakers/Nets. There is no logic to it.
Lma I get. But Drummond needs to play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Ben-N1ce wrote:I'd take KO back. Upgrade in talent. That's all they can do. I can't imagine LMA or Drummond picking the Celtics over Heat/Lakers/Nets. There is no logic to it.

BigTrade92 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:Essentially dumping Theis as an expiring for an another equally expiring player who is worse than Theis, just to save the owner some money is baddddd
This ownership group is in full penny pinch mode
Its to keep us out of the tax, of which we absolutely need to to avoid triggering the repeater tax.
Ainge and the ownership group said two years ago they were ready to start paying the tax. Clearly not.
How can you still defend this? It’s always “next year” with these guys. This group isn’t serious about winning. They care about lining their pockets and being just competitive enough to stay in the playoffs and overachieve to keep the fans base on edge.
There’s a reason Ainge and Wyc have been together since the new ownership group came in. Their business model is working to perfection. Isn’t translating to winning titles though. It’s time for a shake up plain and simple and it needs to start with Ainge going.

djFan71 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:31to6 wrote:Welp Vucevic is indeed on the movecevic, alas not to be a newCeltic. Continuecevic.
With Theis and Hayward now gone, I feel compelled to start claiming that Mo Wagner and Evan Fournier look exactly the same. Like, I can’t tell them apart. But I’m just missing the old days when we had the originals and not these cheaper knockoff versions.
You were rightcevic on wanting vucevic over kembacevic
Neithervic was still the best option.
sully00 wrote:soxfan2003 wrote:jfs1000d wrote:
Dude was third team all nba two years ago. All star before hurt, and hasn't played well.
That was a really bad selection and it was panned at the time. He made it over Klay Thompson. I am no huge Klay fan but he at least twice as good as Kemba. Other players better as well.
Kemba was a really bad signing. You only pay a few short PGs the max entering their 30's and perhaps the only weak defender at PG under 6"2 I would consider paying the max entering his 30's was Steve Nash. Chris Paul decent defender entering his 30's for a PG... The previous knee surgeries is why is was truly a disastrous signing. Celtics should take their chances on players with shaky health if the upside is worth the downside. With Kemba it clearly wasn't.
I am so opposed to paying most 1 way PGs the max that I must admit unless I knew he could bring KD to the Celtics, I would let Kyrie Irving walk as well if the Celtics didn't already have a great big man at least which the team doesn't. Kyrie has his own health concerns. It is one thing to take your chances on these players from 22-28 when they have health issues but later on it can just be a ticking time bomb.
Kemba didn't have to decline much to be an average starting PG in the NBA that is a poor fit with the Celtics. Do you really want to be playing such a player the max?
Kemba is pretty much back to being Kemba. I know everyone wants to blame Walker for the breakdown on defense but folks this team had dominant defenses with IT it ain't about the PG position. Would I rather pay another guy max dollars sure but I think Kemba is going to give you what you paid him for the rest of the season and probably next season. Hopefully Fournier can take some of the pressure off Walker, Tatum, and Brown so that your not relying on first and second year players to cover a slow half.

fallguy wrote:Do not want LMA or Drummond.
Force feed Timelord those minutes.

playa-hater wrote:Whiteside ... A Drummond ... K.O ... Aldridge ... OPJ
any other expected buyout??
so who should we take??
SLCceltic wrote:themoneyteam2 wrote:moonie_mcgee wrote:
He was going into free agency and Ainge went with a younger, taller, less expensive alternative. See Belichick.
Who is also going to free agency after 30 games. That’s the issue lol. Trade an expiring for an expiring.
I understand it was to get under the tax.
I love DT ! but I believe he is a perfect representation of this team ....good and hardworking but not good enough to contend
moving Theis also allows for us to bring in LmA or Drummond ! I want both !! I believe we will get at least one of these guysLmA would give us 5 very good 3pt shooters on floor at the same time ! drummond will gobble up rebounds and finish in the paint at much higher rate that TT ....both these guys along with Fournier give us plenty to throw at Philly bucks and Heat...
fallguy wrote:playa-hater wrote:Whiteside ... A Drummond ... K.O ... Aldridge ... OPJ
any other expected buyout??
so who should we take??
KO or nobody works for me.


Fierce1 wrote:I like Ainge assuring Marcus Smart.
It shows that Ainge cares about the Celtic players.
?s=20
JediMasterRevan wrote:soxfan2003 wrote:jfs1000d wrote:
Dude was third team all nba two years ago. All star before hurt, and hasn't played well.
That was a really bad selection and it was panned at the time. He made it over Klay Thompson. I am no huge Klay fan but he at least twice as good as Kemba. Other players better as well.
Kemba was a really bad signing. You only pay a few short PGs the max entering their 30's and perhaps the only weak defender at PG under 6"2 I would consider paying the max entering his 30's was Steve Nash. Chris Paul decent defender entering his 30's for a PG... The previous knee surgeries is why is was truly a disastrous signing. Celtics should take their chances on players with shaky health if the upside is worth the downside. With Kemba it clearly wasn't.
I am so opposed to paying most 1 way PGs the max that I must admit unless I knew he could bring KD to the Celtics, I would let Kyrie Irving walk as well if the Celtics didn't already have a great big man at least which the team doesn't. Kyrie has his own health concerns. It is one thing to take your chances on these players from 22-28 when they have health issues but later on it can just be a ticking time bomb.
Kemba didn't have to decline much to be an average starting PG in the NBA that is a poor fit with the Celtics. Do you really want to be playing such a player the max?
I wa.ted brogdon or just to pass the pg spot to smart for the year.
hated the kemba signing, say it for what it was, danny trying to save face
Kemba is not a playmaker
Kemba is not a defender
Kemba is small
Kemba was getting older and was reliant on speed
Nothing about kemba made/makes him a good fit with the jays.
6th man is the onpy successful role he can have on this team. If both he and fournier start pur offense will be stagnant, fournier numbers will drop and 9ur defense will be atrocious.
themoneyteam2 wrote:Not even worth having a legitimate discussion with you about the Celtics but I'll respond to this just to give you the attention you are craving.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:BigTrade92 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Its to keep us out of the tax, of which we absolutely need to to avoid triggering the repeater tax.
Ainge and the ownership group said two years ago they were ready to start paying the tax. Clearly not.
How can you still defend this? It’s always “next year” with these guys. This group isn’t serious about winning. They care about lining their pockets and being just competitive enough to stay in the playoffs and overachieve to keep the fans base on edge.
There’s a reason Ainge and Wyc have been together since the new ownership group came in. Their business model is working to perfection. Isn’t translating to winning titles though. It’s time for a shake up plain and simple and it needs to start with Ainge going.
Lol, feel free the post search me. Im not an Ainge defender or one who stumps for ownership. Literally have called the 15 year window PR from ownership on wanting to be the Pacers.
But getting mad over not paying the tax this year? Nah. Wouldve been reckless and stupid to do so when were 21-23 and Tatums extension kicks in next year. Resetting the repeater clock is literally the only option.
BigTrade92 wrote:Essentially dumping Theis as an expiring for an another equally expiring player who is worse than Theis, just to save the owner some money is baddddd
This ownership group is in full penny pinch mode