Mirotic12 wrote:
How someone is regarded as defensively comes 95+% from fan comments and from media members. You have to rate how good someone is on defense from actual analysis. Pierre is no way close to being one of the best defenders in EuroLeague. He's an adequate OK defender. Doornekamp is a way better defender, and it's not even close.
I'm curious how you're doing your analysis. Are you using advanced stats? And if it's just your observation, how is this different from observations from media members and other fans?
I don't really have a dog in this fight. I haven't seen either of them enough over the past two years to have an informed opinion as to who is better. I'm just wondering, since you insist that evaluation has to come from "actual analysis" - what your analysis is based on.