Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,337
- And1: 1,263
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Found the following tweet interesting:
I recall several posters stating the same, and thus wanting Wiseman in the draft.
Based on the poll results from the Jaden McDaniels' Position thread, the height/length would be vastly different than the current 3-4-5 of Edwards, McDaniels and Towns.
I'm willing to give it a try, at the very least.
I recall several posters stating the same, and thus wanting Wiseman in the draft.
Based on the poll results from the Jaden McDaniels' Position thread, the height/length would be vastly different than the current 3-4-5 of Edwards, McDaniels and Towns.
I'm willing to give it a try, at the very least.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,401
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
I am not sure that we have learned that KAT can defend the perimeter capably yet. I think Dane is overstepping that statement a little bit... especially because we have not really seen him do it against some of the more elite 4's.
There's a lot of 4's like Durant/Giannis/Zion/etc/etc. that I really am not confident in saying that we have seen KAT capably guard yet.
This means that KAT will have to play 5 in certain matchups even if we do play him more at the 4. I am open to getting a more capable rim protecting C and playing KAT more often at the 4, but I do not think he's a full-time 4.
There's a lot of 4's like Durant/Giannis/Zion/etc/etc. that I really am not confident in saying that we have seen KAT capably guard yet.
This means that KAT will have to play 5 in certain matchups even if we do play him more at the 4. I am open to getting a more capable rim protecting C and playing KAT more often at the 4, but I do not think he's a full-time 4.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,528
- And1: 17,936
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
TheZachAttack wrote:I am not sure that we have learned that KAT can defend the perimeter capably yet. I think Dane is overstepping that statement a little bit... especially because we have not really seen him do it against some of the more elite 4's.
There's a lot of 4's like Durant/Giannis/Zion/etc/etc. that I really am not confident in saying that we have seen KAT capably guard yet.
This means that KAT will have to play 5 in certain matchups even if we do play him more at the 4. I am open to getting a more capable rim protecting C and playing KAT more often at the 4, but I do not think he's a full-time 4.
He would not necessarily be asked to guard those players, even if they played him at PF.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,649
- And1: 561
- Joined: Jul 26, 2017
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Let's be honest, no one actually guards those players. At least Towns would negate one of their biggest advantages which is size/length. Maybe work out a trade with the Pacers for Turner and let's see.
DLo
Edwards
Mcdaniels
Towns
Turner
That would be fun.
DLo
Edwards
Mcdaniels
Towns
Turner
That would be fun.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,401
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Klomp wrote:TheZachAttack wrote:I am not sure that we have learned that KAT can defend the perimeter capably yet. I think Dane is overstepping that statement a little bit... especially because we have not really seen him do it against some of the more elite 4's.
There's a lot of 4's like Durant/Giannis/Zion/etc/etc. that I really am not confident in saying that we have seen KAT capably guard yet.
This means that KAT will have to play 5 in certain matchups even if we do play him more at the 4. I am open to getting a more capable rim protecting C and playing KAT more often at the 4, but I do not think he's a full-time 4.
He would not necessarily be asked to guard those players, even if they played him at PF.
Who would he guard then? An SF or a SG? PG? We'd ask the center we bring in to guard them? Think it through the downstream impacts of that decision.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,401
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Norseman79 wrote:Let's be honest, no one actually guards those players. At least Towns would negate one of their biggest advantages which is size/length. Maybe work out a trade with the Pacers for Turner and let's see.
DLo
Edwards
Mcdaniels
Towns
Turner
That would be fun.
It could be true... I think it's worth exploring. I guess the only thing is I'm not sure that I want Towns having to work that hard on defense. I don't think he can take that assignment and also such a heavy load offensively as well. It's similar to the fact that not many wings outside of a few elite ones can take the #1 primary defensive assignment and be the #1 on offense.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Junior
- Posts: 478
- And1: 367
- Joined: Jun 14, 2017
- Location: Fountain Inn, SC
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,528
- And1: 17,936
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
TheZachAttack wrote:Klomp wrote:TheZachAttack wrote:I am not sure that we have learned that KAT can defend the perimeter capably yet. I think Dane is overstepping that statement a little bit... especially because we have not really seen him do it against some of the more elite 4's.
There's a lot of 4's like Durant/Giannis/Zion/etc/etc. that I really am not confident in saying that we have seen KAT capably guard yet.
This means that KAT will have to play 5 in certain matchups even if we do play him more at the 4. I am open to getting a more capable rim protecting C and playing KAT more often at the 4, but I do not think he's a full-time 4.
He would not necessarily be asked to guard those players, even if they played him at PF.
Who would he guard then? An SF or a SG? PG? We'd ask the center we bring in to guard them? Think it through the downstream impacts of that decision.
This isn't 2k. PFs don't always guard PFs. Cs don't always guard Cs. That's all I'm saying.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,401
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Klomp wrote:TheZachAttack wrote:Klomp wrote:He would not necessarily be asked to guard those players, even if they played him at PF.
Who would he guard then? An SF or a SG? PG? We'd ask the center we bring in to guard them? Think it through the downstream impacts of that decision.
This isn't 2k. PFs don't always guard PFs. Cs don't always guard Cs. That's all I'm saying.
I would say that when you're a center you're playing in a much different position on the court than the rest of the 4 players generally. It doesn't always happen, but it changes where Towns is positioned on 80% of the possessions. It means that you're asking Towns to guard PFs like that and wings. I am fine with Towns against a lot of PFs. However, in those matchups against more dynamic players... I'd rather shift Towns up.
Plenty of teams do that. The Spurs did that with Duncan. The Lakers do that with Davis all the time.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 24,830
- And1: 3,457
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
You know what the most depressing about this thread is?
That its still all just speculation.
Through all these losing years nobody in the whole Timberwolves organization ever even had the guts of trying KAT at the PF position for a stretch of games. Probably afraid of hurting KATs feelings or whatever.
There were plenty of meaningless games in recent years to give this a try and imho it would work quite well.
That its still all just speculation.
Through all these losing years nobody in the whole Timberwolves organization ever even had the guts of trying KAT at the PF position for a stretch of games. Probably afraid of hurting KATs feelings or whatever.
There were plenty of meaningless games in recent years to give this a try and imho it would work quite well.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,200
- And1: 2,495
- Joined: Aug 22, 2020
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Norseman79 wrote:Let's be honest, no one actually guards those players. At least Towns would negate one of their biggest advantages which is size/length. Maybe work out a trade with the Pacers for Turner and let's see.
DLo
Edwards
Mcdaniels
Towns
Turner
That would be fun.
I think Turner is just too much player. Meaning finding the rotation and minutes game to game based on matchup would be too difficult with a player of Turner’s caliber.
I think the idea and mold here is Dirk in Dallas with Chandler at C. Find an all defensive center that can protect the rim, not needs huge minutes overall, and can be rotated out when Towns needs center minutes due to matchups.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,401
- And1: 1,087
- Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Watching KAT with Naz a little bit more closely and for a more extended period last night has made me believe that it can work. I would go as far to say that I want KAT to at least play SOME PF. However, I still think that Towns will also always play some C.
If we could get something similar to a Jarret Allen type player at C or a guy that's a mid-level player but can stick within a role and play ~25ish MPG, I think that's what I'd prefer. I think McDaniels should be getting some of his minutes at PF as well.
If we could get something similar to a Jarret Allen type player at C or a guy that's a mid-level player but can stick within a role and play ~25ish MPG, I think that's what I'd prefer. I think McDaniels should be getting some of his minutes at PF as well.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,528
- And1: 17,936
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,181
- And1: 1,715
- Joined: Jul 02, 2010
- Location: Mpls
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Klomp wrote:
That pairing passes the eye test too.
That leads me to believe that a pairing with KAT at PF and a defensive-plus unicorn would work.
"a poor addition to the board"
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,245
- And1: 14,626
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
I am very excited about the concept here. I never expected Towns to be willing to move out of his beloved center position, but perhaps he sees this as a way to help the team win more and help his reputation. It is certainly easier for a team to find a center than a PF. The trick will be to have a big man who can defend underneath, but also be a credible three point shooter, so we don’t lose the mismatch advantage Towns creates as a center.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,528
- And1: 17,936
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
shrink wrote:I am very excited about the concept here. I never expected Towns to be willing to move out of his beloved center position, but perhaps he sees this as a way to help the team win more and help his reputation. It is certainly easier for a team to find a center than a PF. The trick will be to have a big man who can defend underneath, but also be a credible three point shooter, so we don’t lose the mismatch advantage Towns creates as a center.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
I believe the "what they don't prefer" narrative is fan-driven and not based 100% on reality.
I also don't think Reid is given enough credit around here. Is he a great defender? Maybe not, but he's proving he can still be an integral part of positive lineups. From a reserve big, that's all we really need. I don't think Dieng would be overly interested in a return. Call them PFs or Cs, but Dieng would still likely be behind both Towns and Reid in the pecking order and I doubt he's overly interested in doing that.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,245
- And1: 14,626
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
Klomp wrote:shrink wrote:I am very excited about the concept here. I never expected Towns to be willing to move out of his beloved center position, but perhaps he sees this as a way to help the team win more and help his reputation. It is certainly easier for a team to find a center than a PF. The trick will be to have a big man who can defend underneath, but also be a credible three point shooter, so we don’t lose the mismatch advantage Towns creates as a center.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
I believe the "what they don't prefer" narrative is fan-driven and not based 100% on reality.
I also don't think Reid is given enough credit around here. Is he a great defender? Maybe not, but he's proving he can still be an integral part of positive lineups. From a reserve big, that's all we really need. I don't think Dieng would be overly interested in a return. Call them PFs or Cs, but Dieng would still likely be behind both Towns and Reid in the pecking order and I doubt he's overly interested in doing that.
For KAT, do you remember what a big deal he made of winning the skills contest “as a center” and this was a victory for “all us centers?” He also campaigned to keep the center position for all star voting, rather than have fans vote for two guards and three forwards.
For DLo, we saw him just stand around when he got stuck playing SG next to Rubio in the first part of the season, and he was very public about wanting the ball in his hands.
I think Gorgui is much better than Naz defensively, and he has made a strong push to increase the range of his already reliable jump shot out to three point range. This season, he is shooting 48% 3P%.
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 63,528
- And1: 17,936
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
shrink wrote:Klomp wrote:shrink wrote:I am very excited about the concept here. I never expected Towns to be willing to move out of his beloved center position, but perhaps he sees this as a way to help the team win more and help his reputation. It is certainly easier for a team to find a center than a PF. The trick will be to have a big man who can defend underneath, but also be a credible three point shooter, so we don’t lose the mismatch advantage Towns creates as a center.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
I believe the "what they don't prefer" narrative is fan-driven and not based 100% on reality.
I also don't think Reid is given enough credit around here. Is he a great defender? Maybe not, but he's proving he can still be an integral part of positive lineups. From a reserve big, that's all we really need. I don't think Dieng would be overly interested in a return. Call them PFs or Cs, but Dieng would still likely be behind both Towns and Reid in the pecking order and I doubt he's overly interested in doing that.
For KAT, do you remember what a big deal he made of winning the skills contest “as a center” and this was a victory for “all us centers?” He also campaigned to keep the center position for all star voting, rather than have fans vote for two guards and three forwards.
For DLo, we saw him just stand around when he got stuck playing SG next to Rubio in the first part of the season, and he was very public about wanting the ball in his hands.
I think Gorgui is much better than Naz defensively, and he has made a strong push to increase the range of his already reliable jump shot out to three point range. This season, he is shooting 48% 3P%.
1. He is a big. Whether you call him a PF or C really isn't a huge deal. Whether he plays in the frontcourt next to another big or two wings really isn't a huge deal.
2. The Saunders offense proved to be very stagnant. It wasn't only the players. That has proved itself out over the past month or so.
3. I know what Dieng has done. I will always be a fan of his. I just think they will favor the offensive versatility of Reid over Dieng.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,318
- And1: 3,985
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
Re: Karl-Anthony Towns' Position
shrink wrote:I am very excited about the concept here. I never expected Towns to be willing to move out of his beloved center position, but perhaps he sees this as a way to help the team win more and help his reputation. It is certainly easier for a team to find a center than a PF. The trick will be to have a big man who can defend underneath, but also be a credible three point shooter, so we don’t lose the mismatch advantage Towns creates as a center.
Naz is fine for now, but his defense needs to take a quantum leap forward. You know who I’d have liked to see, for a cheaper alternative? Bringing back Dieng. He can’t run with the team, but his three point shooting is now credible, he knows how to run Vanterpoole’s system (which was 3rd in defense when Gorgui replaced KAT), and he knows how to play with both KAT and Rubio.
Unlike relationship-builder Ryan Saunders, Finch is getting players to do things they don’t prefer (Towns at PF, DLo at SG). If these can be locked down, this team suddenly becomes a lot better, and much more interesting.
I've never gotten the impression that Towns really cares all that much about playing center. I honestly think he'd be happy if the Wolves could find a 260-270 pound guy to soak up the pounding from the more physical centers in the league.
I've thought for a while that one of the Wolves biggest weaknesses was matching up against the really big centers in the NBA (I really do miss Pek). While I still expect Towns to be primarily a center, I think it would be advantageous to everyone to have a real bruiser type of center on the team. I think there are quite a few matchups where Towns is capable of playing 20 minutes a night at PF while letting somebody else take (or maybe give) a beating in the lane.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves