ImageImageImageImageImage

GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#101 » by RingColluder » Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:50 pm

ILC wrote:PG tried to do way too much at the end there. Lue was late to put Rondo back in. After the Morris bucket to go up 2 he stuck with Mann and had two empty possessions and Philly went up 3. Every basket Clips scored after that came either from Rondo assists or his penetration and then secondary assist (Reggie three).

PG was awesome, but he was also really frustrating dribbling into Simmons, Green and Thybulle a 100 times and losing the ball over and over again.

But a promising outing for Clippers no doubt. Without Kawhi and basically 3 players who came to play barely lost to 76ers with everything going their way.


Agreed, not putting Rondo in way earlier was a mistake. Let's hope they are just saving him for the playoffs.

Paul George cannot have 6 assists and 7 turnovers the way he did. Inexcusable. STOP PLAYING HIM AT POINT GUARD.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#102 » by RingColluder » Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:51 pm

TrueLAfan wrote:
RingColluder wrote:PG went 1-8 to start the game in a 20-3 start and had 7 turnovers.

You people are insane.


This is practically the definition of cherry picking numbers and leaving out info. Yes, PG was 1-8 at the start of the game. Yes, we had a 20-3 deficit. But…

--He went 5-7 for the rest of the half. We cut the initial lead in half. 17 points in the first half
--He was 8-14 in the second half, and 3-7 from three. We came all the way back and lost in the final seconds. 20 points in the second half.

So, in all, 37 points on 29 shots. .577 TS%. Against Ben Simmons, on a team missing its leading scorer. C’mon man. I wish there had been fewer turnovers—but esqtvd is right. You’re being guarded by a first team All-D guy and that’ll happen. The real question is this: Do those turnovers minimize the scoring outburst and overall offensive effectiveness, and the ensuing strong team play? I think for pretty much everyone but you, the answer is no. PG had a really good game.


You can't have 6 assets and 7 turnovers I don't care who you are. That's a net negative.

If Ty Leu just DIDN'T have him as the point guard there wouldn't be issues. He had a bad game because of it, especially when it counted most in the clutch.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#103 » by RingColluder » Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:53 pm

NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
Clemenza wrote:So when is your guy going to suit up and help the team out? You're insane!


You're insane for believing this game was a good game for PG. What a joke you are. Obsessed with PG to the point where he has 7 turnovers and goes 1-8 on a 20-3 run to start the game and still you thin he is somehow a good player when it counts.

Enough is enough. You are the god damn joke here with your constant ridiculing of PG. Seriously man your takes couldn't be more idiotic. PG is playing some of the best ball of his career. He Is the player of the week for the WC but reading your posts would have one believe PG is some scrub lucky to be in the league. You cherry pick numbers as to how he starts the game or how he ends it. Without PG this team is a lottery team these last 8 games.
We pretty much beat the best home team in the league without 3 starters and here you are whining.


You're the one who esqtvd and others said was a total troll and dominated the board with your hate and stupidity so you have absolutely no respect on this board.


I'm going to stop with the replies bc I have so many quotes, AND until I get a message back from the mod I wrote to.
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,087
And1: 4,828
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#104 » by esqtvd » Sat Apr 17, 2021 7:42 pm

LamarWho wrote:Not impressed with this sixer team at all. Without Embiid, .500 team at best, in the east. We all know Embiid is just an injury waiting to happen. They rely heavily on shooting the 3s but they are just a mediocre 3pt shooting team.

Oh and did I mention who their head coach is? :lol:


My hometown team. Watch tons of their games. MUCH better than last year with much the same cast. #2 defense behind the Lakers. Simmons can't or won't shoot, their 3rd "star" is Tobias, who we dumped for being too passive. Wouldn't give you more than a late-round FRP for any of the rest.

Like you said, without Embiid, a .500 team but they just won 9 out of 10 without him anyway. Coach must be doing SOMETHING right. :D
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
Captain Ballmer
Rookie
Posts: 1,205
And1: 982
Joined: Jul 14, 2015
Location: Istanbul
   

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#105 » by Captain Ballmer » Sat Apr 17, 2021 7:52 pm

I was expecting Zubac to give a little bit more challenge to Embiid. He's not going to stop him obviously but if we are going refer him as our future big he should have been perform better than just 16 minutes of mediocre play resulted the team going small against the most dominant big in the game.
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against OKC, HOU, PHX, MIN (0-14)
2024-25 Clippers W/L Count against rest of NBA (43-18)
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,087
And1: 4,828
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#106 » by esqtvd » Sat Apr 17, 2021 7:55 pm

RingColluder wrote:
TrueLAfan wrote:
RingColluder wrote:PG went 1-8 to start the game in a 20-3 start and had 7 turnovers.

You people are insane.


This is practically the definition of cherry picking numbers and leaving out info. Yes, PG was 1-8 at the start of the game. Yes, we had a 20-3 deficit. But…

--He went 5-7 for the rest of the half. We cut the initial lead in half. 17 points in the first half
--He was 8-14 in the second half, and 3-7 from three. We came all the way back and lost in the final seconds. 20 points in the second half.

So, in all, 37 points on 29 shots. .577 TS%. Against Ben Simmons, on a team missing its leading scorer. C’mon man. I wish there had been fewer turnovers—but esqtvd is right. You’re being guarded by a first team All-D guy and that’ll happen. The real question is this: Do those turnovers minimize the scoring outburst and overall offensive effectiveness, and the ensuing strong team play? I think for pretty much everyone but you, the answer is no. PG had a really good game.


You can't have 6 assets and 7 turnovers I don't care who you are. That's a net negative.

If Ty Leu just DIDN'T have him as the point guard there wouldn't be issues. He had a bad game because of it, especially when it counted most in the clutch.



Check Doncic's turnovers sometime. High usage, it happens. And Simmons picked PG's pocket a number of times when he was trying to score, not playmake. That happens to scorers too. As for the couple of major trolls here, I try to make them as invisible as possible except when I laugh at them. Nobody here cares what they think because they don't. :wink:

You wanna dog PG, that's fine I guess. But so far he's doing everything possible to make up for that Game 7. There are several others who deserve more heat, but as a team they're sticking together through a LOT of injuries and some [like Reggie and even Pat Pat] stepping up much more than expected.

As for the playmaking, Rondo is getting stretched out and I expect Bev to contribute, as well as Kawhi taking the load off PG too. PG doesn't want to play point guard, believe me. He was having the time of his life when he won Player of the Week, just scoring and playing D and not having to play Jesus Christ on skates.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,087
And1: 4,828
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#107 » by esqtvd » Sat Apr 17, 2021 7:58 pm

Captain Ballmer wrote:I was expecting Zubac to give a little bit more challenge to Embiid. He's not going to stop him obviously but if we are going refer him as our future big he should have been perform better than just 16 minutes of mediocre play resulted the team going small against the most dominant big in the game.


Yah that was painful. Two quick fouls and he never got rolling. Might as well have not dressed. It makes Patterson even a bigger hero having to belly up to Embiid.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#108 » by RingColluder » Sat Apr 17, 2021 9:12 pm

esqtvd wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
TrueLAfan wrote:
This is practically the definition of cherry picking numbers and leaving out info. Yes, PG was 1-8 at the start of the game. Yes, we had a 20-3 deficit. But…

--He went 5-7 for the rest of the half. We cut the initial lead in half. 17 points in the first half
--He was 8-14 in the second half, and 3-7 from three. We came all the way back and lost in the final seconds. 20 points in the second half.

So, in all, 37 points on 29 shots. .577 TS%. Against Ben Simmons, on a team missing its leading scorer. C’mon man. I wish there had been fewer turnovers—but esqtvd is right. You’re being guarded by a first team All-D guy and that’ll happen. The real question is this: Do those turnovers minimize the scoring outburst and overall offensive effectiveness, and the ensuing strong team play? I think for pretty much everyone but you, the answer is no. PG had a really good game.


You can't have 6 assets and 7 turnovers I don't care who you are. That's a net negative.

If Ty Leu just DIDN'T have him as the point guard there wouldn't be issues. He had a bad game because of it, especially when it counted most in the clutch.



Check Doncic's turnovers sometime. High usage, it happens. And Simmons picked PG's pocket a number of times when he was trying to score, not playmake. That happens to scorers too. As for the couple of major trolls here, I try to make them as invisible as possible except when I laugh at them. Nobody here cares what they think because they don't. :wink:

You wanna dog PG, that's fine I guess. But so far he's doing everything possible to make up for that Game 7. There are several others who deserve more heat, but as a team they're sticking together through a LOT of injuries and some [like Reggie and even Pat Pat] stepping up much more than expected.

As for the playmaking, Rondo is getting stretched out and I expect Bev to contribute, as well as Kawhi taking the load off PG too. PG doesn't want to play point guard, believe me. He was having the time of his life when he won Player of the Week, just scoring and playing D and not having to play Jesus Christ on skates.


Doncic also averages 9 assists a game and can have games where he is just extraordinary with the ball (19 assists last game??), with far less offensive options on his team w no Porzingis.

I totally agree with your bolded statement :lol: :lol: I appreciate how we can disagree on issues without getting into personal attacks and focus on stats and analytics. I'd just hope the moderators aren't hypocritical with their stance on issues, still awaiting a response to my message.

I agree others deserve more heat as well. Kennard was horrendous and exactly why I do not want him playing, we can have Rondo and if not have TMann in the lineup instead. Having two :scorers" with bad defense does not work. Why not put in TMann to go with Reggie who is a great balance to Reggie in the backcourt???

I'm going into the playoffs not expecting Bev or Ibaka to make an impact assuming injuries are still an issue (or worse Bev plays for 25 minutes then gets too injured to play the rest of the season). Rondo so far doesn't look gassed at all, so hopefully Ty is just being super cautious with him. Yeah I dont think PG wants to play PG either, but Lue is making him. At this point I'd rather have Kennard or whoever he subs in play PG and just let Paul George do what he does best which is score and play d. His playmaking is god awful and ruining what could be great games for him.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#109 » by RingColluder » Sat Apr 17, 2021 9:14 pm

esqtvd wrote:
Captain Ballmer wrote:I was expecting Zubac to give a little bit more challenge to Embiid. He's not going to stop him obviously but if we are going refer him as our future big he should have been perform better than just 16 minutes of mediocre play resulted the team going small against the most dominant big in the game.


Yah that was painful. Two quick fouls and he never got rolling. Might as well have not dressed. It makes Patterson even a bigger hero having to belly up to Embiid.


I know people are happy w this game, but as mentioned had Patterson not made his 5 3's we don't even come close to getting back into this game. This was a bad loss, and continues my fears that as teams play the clippers more often and make adjustments, we get exposed and can't counter.
Scoundreldays
Analyst
Posts: 3,389
And1: 2,812
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#110 » by Scoundreldays » Sat Apr 17, 2021 9:59 pm

esqtvd wrote:
Captain Ballmer wrote:I was expecting Zubac to give a little bit more challenge to Embiid. He's not going to stop him obviously but if we are going refer him as our future big he should have been perform better than just 16 minutes of mediocre play resulted the team going small against the most dominant big in the game.


Yah that was painful. Two quick fouls and he never got rolling. Might as well have not dressed. It makes Patterson even a bigger hero having to belly up to Embiid.


Zu needs to just keep his feet planted when he is guarding outside the paint. From my observation he gets fooled pretty easily by pump fakes which leads to some silly fouls.

I was very impressed by Patterson tonight, he stepped up big. Hopefully he can stay hot!
NickP
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,322
And1: 963
Joined: Aug 20, 2020
 

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#111 » by NickP » Sat Apr 17, 2021 10:09 pm

RingColluder wrote:
NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
You're insane for believing this game was a good game for PG. What a joke you are. Obsessed with PG to the point where he has 7 turnovers and goes 1-8 on a 20-3 run to start the game and still you thin he is somehow a good player when it counts.

Enough is enough. You are the god damn joke here with your constant ridiculing of PG. Seriously man your takes couldn't be more idiotic. PG is playing some of the best ball of his career. He Is the player of the week for the WC but reading your posts would have one believe PG is some scrub lucky to be in the league. You cherry pick numbers as to how he starts the game or how he ends it. Without PG this team is a lottery team these last 8 games.
We pretty much beat the best home team in the league without 3 starters and here you are whining.


You're the one who esqtvd and others said was a total troll and dominated the board with your hate and stupidity so you have absolutely no respect on this board.


I'm going to stop with the replies bc I have so many quotes, AND until I get a message back from the mod I wrote to.

Maybe you two should get a room :)
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#112 » by RingColluder » Sun Apr 18, 2021 3:18 am

NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
NickP wrote:Enough is enough. You are the god damn joke here with your constant ridiculing of PG. Seriously man your takes couldn't be more idiotic. PG is playing some of the best ball of his career. He Is the player of the week for the WC but reading your posts would have one believe PG is some scrub lucky to be in the league. You cherry pick numbers as to how he starts the game or how he ends it. Without PG this team is a lottery team these last 8 games.
We pretty much beat the best home team in the league without 3 starters and here you are whining.


You're the one who esqtvd and others said was a total troll and dominated the board with your hate and stupidity so you have absolutely no respect on this board.


I'm going to stop with the replies bc I have so many quotes, AND until I get a message back from the mod I wrote to.

Maybe you two should get a room :)


I realize the decorum on this board after messaging.

Continue supporting Paul George. Good luck with that, I'm surprised you even support the Clippers organization after all I've heard from others.
NickP
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,322
And1: 963
Joined: Aug 20, 2020
 

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#113 » by NickP » Sun Apr 18, 2021 6:46 pm

RingColluder wrote:
NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
You're the one who esqtvd and others said was a total troll and dominated the board with your hate and stupidity so you have absolutely no respect on this board.


I'm going to stop with the replies bc I have so many quotes, AND until I get a message back from the mod I wrote to.

Maybe you two should get a room :)


I realize the decorum on this board after messaging.

Continue supporting Paul George. Good luck with that, I'm surprised you even support the Clippers organization after all I've heard from others.

Unlike you I am going to support PG and this team. Meanwhile you can continue with your idiotic PG bashing.
As far as all those posters messaging you about my posting history? You and them can collectively kiss my a##.
RingColluder
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 240
Joined: Mar 02, 2021

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#114 » by RingColluder » Sun Apr 18, 2021 7:15 pm

NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
NickP wrote:Maybe you two should get a room :)


I realize the decorum on this board after messaging.

Continue supporting Paul George. Good luck with that, I'm surprised you even support the Clippers organization after all I've heard from others.

Unlike you I am going to support PG and this team. Meanwhile you can continue with your idiotic PG bashing.
As far as all those posters messaging you about my posting history? You and them can collectively kiss my a##.


So og, I get warnings for my posts and yet nothing for this poster? What exactly is going on here?

Such double standards on this board
User avatar
MartinToVaught
RealGM
Posts: 15,705
And1: 17,777
Joined: Oct 19, 2014
     

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#115 » by MartinToVaught » Sun Apr 18, 2021 9:56 pm

Why is anyone messaging anyone about other people's posting histories behind their backs? That's some Kevin Durant type of behavior. :crazy:
Image
Clemenza
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,950
And1: 5,099
Joined: Jan 21, 2013
Location: California
   

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#116 » by Clemenza » Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:58 am

MartinToVaught wrote:Why is anyone messaging anyone about other people's posting histories behind their backs? That's some Kevin Durant type of behavior. :crazy:

Agreed.. This board has turned to total sh*t
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,684
And1: 33,466
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: GAME 58: Clippers (39-18) @ 76ers (38-17)—Friday 4PM PDT 

Post#117 » by og15 » Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:38 am

RingColluder wrote:
NickP wrote:
RingColluder wrote:
I realize the decorum on this board after messaging.

Continue supporting Paul George. Good luck with that, I'm surprised you even support the Clippers organization after all I've heard from others.

Unlike you I am going to support PG and this team. Meanwhile you can continue with your idiotic PG bashing.
As far as all those posters messaging you about my posting history? You and them can collectively kiss my a##.


So og, I get warnings for my posts and yet nothing for this poster? What exactly is going on here?

Such double standards on this board

Don't backseat moderate, I don't spend my life on here checking every single post made, that's why the report feature is there. You guys need to cut out this "life isn't fair, this person didn't get a warning" nonsense, first you have no clue who is getting a warning or not, as it's not always indicated in the post. Use the report feature, if you don't, then don't whine, simple. This should be the last time with this.

This thread is done

Return to Los Angeles Clippers