Paolo Banchero

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,048
And1: 70,234
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#21 » by clyde21 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:23 pm

Mickey8 wrote:I am not comparing their games , but in the sense that there will be lots of better prospects than him who will be picked up after , international 2003 generation is very strong and I see many players there looking more talented than him, but this the only early projection.


other than Vic who?
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Mickey8
Head Coach
Posts: 6,376
And1: 5,233
Joined: Jan 21, 2017

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#22 » by Mickey8 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:33 pm

I wont talk about it now, it will get crystallized by the next year and even after u19 world championships this summer. But there are lots of great prospects born in 2003 from the Europe. That generation is one of the deepest in the recent history. I am expecting many of them to become first round picks and some of them in the lottery.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,426
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#23 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:50 pm

God Squad wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:Scary talent if he is really 6’11. I always thought he was 6’8ish. He is very strong, has good touch and solid moves down low and has really progressed with range.

I was questionable about his potential if he’s 6’8 because I’m not sure he has the quickness to be versatile on the defensive end. But if he’s really 6’11, then he’s a solid 4/5 in today’s game. The height and progression with his jumper has turned him into an elite prospect.

I know you've been down on Duke lately, But I'm extremely optimistic about Banchero/Griffin duo.


No doubt should be a fun team to watch, but speaking from a Duke fan perspective I’m not too optimistic about the team. K has been on a pretty steep decline in coaching ability and even with two guys that I think are going to be true studs, it won’t be a big enough talent advantage for Duke to be anything serious next year.
TraBuch
Sophomore
Posts: 131
And1: 118
Joined: Feb 09, 2016

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#24 » by TraBuch » Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:46 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
God Squad wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:Scary talent if he is really 6’11. I always thought he was 6’8ish. He is very strong, has good touch and solid moves down low and has really progressed with range.

I was questionable about his potential if he’s 6’8 because I’m not sure he has the quickness to be versatile on the defensive end. But if he’s really 6’11, then he’s a solid 4/5 in today’s game. The height and progression with his jumper has turned him into an elite prospect.

I know you've been down on Duke lately, But I'm extremely optimistic about Banchero/Griffin duo.


No doubt should be a fun team to watch, but speaking from a Duke fan perspective I’m not too optimistic about the team. K has been on a pretty steep decline in coaching ability and even with two guys that I think are going to be true studs, it won’t be a big enough talent advantage for Duke to be anything serious next year.

K needs a Justise Winslow and a Tyus Jones for his system to work. I think Griffin can definitely be a Winslow, can a second year Roach be a Tyus? I’m not too sure about that.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,048
And1: 70,234
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#25 » by clyde21 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:02 pm

K doesn't even have much of a system right now, dude had Tre Jones with Zion and it was still barely functional, just got by on pure talent
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,426
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#26 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:03 pm

TraBuch wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
God Squad wrote:I know you've been down on Duke lately, But I'm extremely optimistic about Banchero/Griffin duo.


No doubt should be a fun team to watch, but speaking from a Duke fan perspective I’m not too optimistic about the team. K has been on a pretty steep decline in coaching ability and even with two guys that I think are going to be true studs, it won’t be a big enough talent advantage for Duke to be anything serious next year.

K needs a Justise Winslow and a Tyus Jones for his system to work. I think Griffin can definitely be a Winslow, can a second year Roach be a Tyus? I’m not too sure about that.


I give K some credit for 2015 because ya it may have took over half the season, but he finally did bench Amile and moved Winslow to the 4 and that was the game changer for that team. But ya I agree, K needs those true game changers. Winslow was a game changer when it came to glue stuff and defense, and Tyus was the perfect guy to run the offense.

I’ma huge fan of AJ, but I’m not expecting the defensive impact that Winslow had. AJ has the potential with his size and athleticism, but AJ has some questions with his motor especially on the defensive end. Winslow never had that.

With that said, I don’t think this Duke team will be missing that dog in them though, I expect Paolo to be one tough son of a B, he’s not going to get pushed around.

Again big fan of the two studs, I really like the team especially with Roach coming back and Keels coming in. I just think at this point in K’s career, he needs a marine massive talent advantage not to blow it. And for this Duke team to have that, they need a miracle and get Baldwin to sign.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,426
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#27 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:06 pm

clyde21 wrote:K doesn't even have much of a system right now, dude had Tre Jones with Zion and it was still barely functional, just got by on pure talent


I don’t know how it happened, but K turned into Mark Jackson on the offense. No system, no movement, just roll the ball out and hope one of the freshmen can do something.

That is what blew it with the Zion team. Close games we didn’t go to Zion. It became the RJ hero hour. And don’t get me wrong, RJ was good but he wasn’t an unstoppable freak like Zion. That team didn’t even need a freaking system to win it all, all they had to do was not go away from Zion in close games and they probably win it all.

Crazy how bad K has become.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,748
And1: 67,426
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#28 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:09 pm

But back on point, if Paolo really is 6’11 (I definitely buy the 250 pounds part), that is a scary good prospect. Because that jumper is looking pretty damn nice. Ya he isn’t a sharp shooter, but the form is really good and his results are getting better and better. Him being 6’11 is huge (if true).

If K doesnt screw this up, Paolo should be able to eat up 99% of college defenses. Then ideal defenses are focused on him, AJ will be able to attack and go to work as well.

(Baldwin’s sharpshooting would be the ideal fit with those two guys...)
TraBuch
Sophomore
Posts: 131
And1: 118
Joined: Feb 09, 2016

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#29 » by TraBuch » Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:00 pm

I think a starting lineup of Roach, Moore, Griffin, Banchero and Williams with Keels, John and Baker off the bench is a damn good team and is totally capable of winning it all. That’s potentially four first round picks with some upper class experience mixed in with Moore, Baker and John. I think the X factor will be Roach. If Roach improves and shows everyone why he was K’s number one choice at PG over some other players he could’ve had, that’s a championship team.
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,414
And1: 1,556
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#30 » by CP War Hawks » Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:15 am

This dude didn't skip leg day not one time during the pandemic.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,187
And1: 8,559
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#31 » by SNPA » Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:27 am

Mickey8 wrote:I am not comparing their games , but in the sense that there will be lots of better prospects than him who will be picked up after , international 2003 generation is very strong and I see many players there looking more talented than him, but this the only early projection.

Many? Post some.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,048
And1: 70,234
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#32 » by clyde21 » Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:35 am

TraBuch wrote:I think a starting lineup of Roach, Moore, Griffin, Banchero and Williams with Keels, John and Baker off the bench is a damn good team and is totally capable of winning it all. That’s potentially four first round picks with some upper class experience mixed in with Moore, Baker and John. I think the X factor will be Roach. If Roach improves and shows everyone why he was K’s number one choice at PG over some other players he could’ve had, that’s a championship team.


would've liked them a little more if Coleman was coming back

but yea, no way they win it all...if they couldn't win with Zion, RJ, Cam and Tre then they won't with this team.

i'm also not fully bought in on Griffin at this point either, but we'll see.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Monix
Pro Prospect
Posts: 970
And1: 740
Joined: Jan 20, 2017

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#33 » by Monix » Sat Apr 24, 2021 2:51 pm

hopefully someone teaches him how to defend - standing around in a 2-3 zone in Durham hasn't helped many of their recent bigs
TraBuch
Sophomore
Posts: 131
And1: 118
Joined: Feb 09, 2016

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#34 » by TraBuch » Sat Apr 24, 2021 4:01 pm

Monix wrote:hopefully someone teaches him how to defend - standing around in a 2-3 zone in Durham hasn't helped many of their recent bigs

Duke rarely plays zone, much to the chagrin of a large portion of the fanbase.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,187
And1: 8,559
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#35 » by SNPA » Sun Aug 8, 2021 7:19 pm

At this point I know next to nothing about this upcoming class. But I know this, this kid goes number one or there’s an Anthony Davis/LeBron level prospect somewhere. Paolo looks legit, be bullying grown men first day of summer league.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,187
And1: 8,559
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#36 » by SNPA » Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:27 am

DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,530
And1: 5,772
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#37 » by DCasey91 » Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:13 am

Banch is huge and has slimmed down which is a big plus.

Anyone that watched Cade should knows he ain’t 6”8”

for Banch the wingspan and standing reach is more important. May have the Ben Simmons/Blake Griffin T. rex arms which isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

But if someone said 6”9-6”10 250? I’d say yes to both.

I mean he’s ahead of Cade by a distance by virtue of literally being a huge Cade out there. Bulky Tatum, final form Ben take your pick.

He looks like he could start at SF/PF in the NBA tomorrow and wouldn’t look out of place.

Don’t know what they fed him but they need to do that with Chet ASAP. He’s 19 and behind where I’d like him to be bodywise.
Li WenWen is the GOAT
Hal14
RealGM
Posts: 22,107
And1: 20,913
Joined: Apr 05, 2019

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#38 » by Hal14 » Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:24 am

Mickey8 wrote:I think his height is inflated , there is no way he's 6"11 :D

He looks more like 6'9". At least that's going off his high school footage from last season, maybe he's 6'10" now..
Nothing wrong with having a different opinion - as long as it's done respectfully. It'd be lame if we all agreed on everything :)
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#39 » by nolang1 » Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:29 am

I feel like at some point we should have a separate forum dedicated solely to arguing about whether a prospect is an inch taller or shorter than listed - use all the photos and videos you want and pay no mind to how someone's posture or their location relative to the camera can make a difference!
Marcus
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,315
And1: 5,173
Joined: Mar 03, 2014

Re: Paolo Banchero 

Post#40 » by Marcus » Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:40 am

nolang1 wrote:I feel like at some point we should have a separate forum dedicated solely to arguing about whether a prospect is an inch taller or shorter than listed - use all the photos and videos you want and pay no mind to how someone's posture or their location relative to the camera can make a difference!


all jokes aside i've considered this.
Watch More Basketball

Sometimes silence is the best thing you can contribute to a conversation

after what he did to Moses Moody's name, I got DJ K. Perk in a Verzuz battle against ANYBODY

Return to NBA Draft