ImageImage

2021 Packers News, Trades, Transactions - Sternberger Released

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1261 » by sdn40 » Sat May 22, 2021 4:14 pm

M-C-G wrote:Devin White is fast. Rodgers would have scored a TD or gotten to the 2 yard line at worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is based on you knowing the play and route progressions and all adjustments which dictate where Rodgers eyes are at --- of course. Please enlighten us. Or maybe Rodgers should have hit pause and then scanned the field and then hit resume, circle, triangle, square for super boost power and spin move ?
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1262 » by Reddeye » Sat May 22, 2021 4:28 pm

sdn40 wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
Here is what I know. Aaron Rodgers was a 2 time LEAGUE WIDE MVP before those seasons. He was an MVP after those seasons. If you have to tell yourself he was on an unrecoverable decline in those seasons to justify managements decisions that led to the **** we find ourselves in now, then so be it.


Do you think Rodgers played well in 2018 and 2019?

Do you think MLF's offense and play calling should get much if any credit for Rodger's MVP season?


Grab a football and a hammer. Go outside. Hit your left knee with the hammer. Now throw the football. Let me know how that works for you


I am guessing that is your reasoning for 18? Is the reason for 19 a new offense?
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1263 » by M-C-G » Sat May 22, 2021 4:32 pm

hege53190 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
After I said that Rodgers wasn't that bad and point to Yards, TDs and INTs even with terrible WRs. The you say he was because of this ridiculous "bad play" notion. Which I would love to see how and who grades this.

Did you now use Yards, TDs and INT's to prove that Aaron played well with his ass hat of WRs? What about the bad plays? I mean in the 4 games on 150 drop backs he had to have at least 60 right?

What a joke.


So RS gave you the calculation for Bad plays and you either didn't read it or you just didn't like it, so which was it? Thought it laid it out pretty clearly.

I am beginning to think you either have too many arguments going on or you just aren't trying to even consider what is being presented because you just don't want to change your opinion which would be fine,.


RS gave me the "bad play" stat for the entire season. Your argument is for those 4 weeks. You used Yards, TDs and INTs to make your argument. Something you trashed earlier. Throwing out this bad play argument.

Again what constitutes a bad play and who judges it. Something as simple as MVS's 2020 dropped passes was off by 75% based on who perceived what happened. Rodgers missing an open receiver? What constitutes an open receiver? Rodgers was off target? How far does a ball have to be off to be considered off-target? At the end of the day there are a million judgement call variables by some armchair QB or team of armchair QBs broken down into one all encompassing stat.

But I am supposed to take some random websites calculation as the definitive source on QB play. Maybe he found it on the same website that **** up something as simple as when Rodgers contract started.

Here is what I know. Aaron Rodgers was a 2 time LEAGUE WIDE MVP before those seasons. He was an MVP after those seasons. If you have to tell yourself he was on an unrecoverable decline in those seasons to justify managements decisions that led to the **** we find ourselves in now, then so be it.


Here is what I would say, you obviously don’t read what I write because you continually insert all sorts of opinions that I never made to me. We are getting nowhere here, I think largely because you aren’t considering my argument while I am at least considering yours, I just disagree, while you just do whatever you are doing, spewing might be the right word. No worries, we just disagree and probably never will on the topic. Let’s see what happens next


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1264 » by M-C-G » Sat May 22, 2021 4:36 pm

sdn40 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
No - it didn't



WOAH, tone down the argument man!

If it was for that #3 pick, yeah, that was the time, depending on how likely you think it is he will be back in green bay. I think I was 75% sure he was out and now 50/50.


For the #3 pick and draft who exactly ?? Another over rated TE in Pitts ?? And check out what the Rodgers contract ramifications would have been. And trade him to an NFC team and worse yet S.F ?? Only xbox players think that would have been a good trade. In real life - not so much at all


Contract ramifications were taking a lump this year and signing a journey man QB to start. You aren’t trading Rodgers and bringing in a big FA so that doesn’t really matter. Plus you could still have timed the trade in practicality to be easier capwise while having the picks drafted for us.

As for what I would have done? Traded back for a first and second and possibly a future first depending how far back.

The Madden comments were really slick like five years ago, I think know it is more of an indicator that someone lacks imagination and they throw that out to shut down conversation versus participate in a discussion. Just my two cents, but I will say it isn’t as lazy as the first comment.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1265 » by M-C-G » Sat May 22, 2021 4:38 pm

sdn40 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Devin White is fast. Rodgers would have scored a TD or gotten to the 2 yard line at worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is based on you knowing the play and route progressions and all adjustments which dictate where Rodgers eyes are at --- of course. Please enlighten us. Or maybe Rodgers should have hit pause and then scanned the field and then hit resume, circle, triangle, square for super boost power and spin move ?


Oh a Madden reference everybody, come look, quick, it is a Madden reference!

Just watching Rodgers with my eyeballs his whole career and looking at about four different angles of the field.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
sdn40
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,368
And1: 1,418
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1266 » by sdn40 » Sat May 22, 2021 4:45 pm

M-C-G wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:Devin White is fast. Rodgers would have scored a TD or gotten to the 2 yard line at worst.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is based on you knowing the play and route progressions and all adjustments which dictate where Rodgers eyes are at --- of course. Please enlighten us. Or maybe Rodgers should have hit pause and then scanned the field and then hit resume, circle, triangle, square for super boost power and spin move ?


Oh a Madden reference everybody, come look, quick, it is a Madden reference!

Just watching Rodgers with my eyeballs his whole career and looking at about four different angles of the field.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Internet QB's who look at photos and scream about open receivers or running lanes --- yeah totally Madden based, and probably never even stood on a football field, much less experienced the mass hysteria that happens on every play. Pretty much a dead giveaway. Zero concept of what the field of vision peripherally is when standing on the 10 yard line of a 50 yard wide field, much less the eye discipline of the NFL playbook. But as you said - you've watched Rodgers his whole career (wow amazing) - so you're the expert.

For those that really wonder - go stand on the 10 yard line at your local high school field and realize the exact field of view and what it takes to see pylon to pylon.

Now try the impossible. Comprehend 4 seconds filled with a drop back, scrambling, reading the defense, route progressions, adjustments, avoiding a sack, throwing lanes, defenders crossing your field of view, keeping track of the original line of scrimmage, likely scramble drill. All while knowing ahead of time that all defenders who are faster than you are gonna be within 6 yards of the goal line at most. Then some random internet dudes from the comfort of their la z boy says you should have run it in on the far right - per a photo signifying a millisecond of time and space - likely outside your field of view as you were tracking WR's on the inside per the unwritten QB rules that far into the play (angles, cross body, open body, shallow sideline throws with sitting cb's etc etc).
hege53190
Head Coach
Posts: 7,334
And1: 2,671
Joined: Nov 29, 2001

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1267 » by hege53190 » Sat May 22, 2021 4:54 pm

M-C-G wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
So RS gave you the calculation for Bad plays and you either didn't read it or you just didn't like it, so which was it? Thought it laid it out pretty clearly.

I am beginning to think you either have too many arguments going on or you just aren't trying to even consider what is being presented because you just don't want to change your opinion which would be fine,.


RS gave me the "bad play" stat for the entire season. Your argument is for those 4 weeks. You used Yards, TDs and INTs to make your argument. Something you trashed earlier. Throwing out this bad play argument.

Again what constitutes a bad play and who judges it. Something as simple as MVS's 2020 dropped passes was off by 75% based on who perceived what happened. Rodgers missing an open receiver? What constitutes an open receiver? Rodgers was off target? How far does a ball have to be off to be considered off-target? At the end of the day there are a million judgement call variables by some armchair QB or team of armchair QBs broken down into one all encompassing stat.

But I am supposed to take some random websites calculation as the definitive source on QB play. Maybe he found it on the same website that **** up something as simple as when Rodgers contract started.

Here is what I know. Aaron Rodgers was a 2 time LEAGUE WIDE MVP before those seasons. He was an MVP after those seasons. If you have to tell yourself he was on an unrecoverable decline in those seasons to justify managements decisions that led to the **** we find ourselves in now, then so be it.


Here is what I would say, you obviously don’t read what I write because you continually insert all sorts of opinions that I never made to me. We are getting nowhere here, I think largely because you aren’t considering my argument while I am at least considering yours, I just disagree, while you just do whatever you are doing, spewing might be the right word. No worries, we just disagree and probably never will on the topic. Let’s see what happens next


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


You are right, we won't agree. So please stop responding to my posts.
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1268 » by Reddeye » Sat May 22, 2021 5:32 pm

hege53190 wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
Here is what I know. Aaron Rodgers was a 2 time LEAGUE WIDE MVP before those seasons. He was an MVP after those seasons. If you have to tell yourself he was on an unrecoverable decline in those seasons to justify managements decisions that led to the **** we find ourselves in now, then so be it.


Do you think Rodgers played well in 2018 and 2019?

Do you think MLF's offense and play calling should get much if any credit for Rodger's MVP season?


1.) Yes

2.) MLF had a good offensive scheme. Sure. It is good to play in an offensive system that makes a QBs job easier. I don't think MLF had some revolutionary offense.

I think it would be much easier to get Rodgers to play that well in a number of NFL systems than to find a QB that could duplicate what Rodgers did in MLFs system.


Were you for keeping Favre and trading Rodgers in 2008?
jute2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,197
And1: 2,573
Joined: Feb 20, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1269 » by jute2003 » Sat May 22, 2021 5:51 pm

Reddeye wrote:I thought I read his fiance has homes in Colorado and California. Probably just a coincidence that the trade teams mentioned were 49ers, Raiders and Broncos.
He grew up in Cali. She may have had some influence butI bet his preferred teams would be pretty similar if she wasn't around.
only a fan, only an opinion
hege53190
Head Coach
Posts: 7,334
And1: 2,671
Joined: Nov 29, 2001

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1270 » by hege53190 » Sat May 22, 2021 10:05 pm

Reddeye wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
Reddeye wrote:
Do you think Rodgers played well in 2018 and 2019?

Do you think MLF's offense and play calling should get much if any credit for Rodger's MVP season?


1.) Yes

2.) MLF had a good offensive scheme. Sure. It is good to play in an offensive system that makes a QBs job easier. I don't think MLF had some revolutionary offense.

I think it would be much easier to get Rodgers to play that well in a number of NFL systems than to find a QB that could duplicate what Rodgers did in MLFs system.


Were you for keeping Favre and trading Rodgers in 2008?


Nope. After threatening retirement for what 5 years?, Favre finally pulled the trigger and retired at 38 years old. At the time, the list of QBs in NFL history to be semi decent after that age was ..... Warren Mooon?

Favre was really a trail blazer for a QB playing well at 40 years old. Each year it does get easier. However nobody really did it up to that point.

Now the list of HOF QBs playing at a high level at 40 is not just Favre but also includes Brady and Brees. Manning and Rivers had high level seasons in their late 30s. Things have changed that allow QBs to play better later in their careers.

Rodgers on the other hand never threatened retirement before this off-season. Before last off-season never said he wanted to be anything but a Green Bay Packer. And it seemed like Rodgers eventually would happily retire a Packer.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1271 » by M-C-G » Sun May 23, 2021 2:33 pm

hege53190 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
RS gave me the "bad play" stat for the entire season. Your argument is for those 4 weeks. You used Yards, TDs and INTs to make your argument. Something you trashed earlier. Throwing out this bad play argument.

Again what constitutes a bad play and who judges it. Something as simple as MVS's 2020 dropped passes was off by 75% based on who perceived what happened. Rodgers missing an open receiver? What constitutes an open receiver? Rodgers was off target? How far does a ball have to be off to be considered off-target? At the end of the day there are a million judgement call variables by some armchair QB or team of armchair QBs broken down into one all encompassing stat.

But I am supposed to take some random websites calculation as the definitive source on QB play. Maybe he found it on the same website that **** up something as simple as when Rodgers contract started.

Here is what I know. Aaron Rodgers was a 2 time LEAGUE WIDE MVP before those seasons. He was an MVP after those seasons. If you have to tell yourself he was on an unrecoverable decline in those seasons to justify managements decisions that led to the **** we find ourselves in now, then so be it.


Here is what I would say, you obviously don’t read what I write because you continually insert all sorts of opinions that I never made to me. We are getting nowhere here, I think largely because you aren’t considering my argument while I am at least considering yours, I just disagree, while you just do whatever you are doing, spewing might be the right word. No worries, we just disagree and probably never will on the topic. Let’s see what happens next


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You are right, we won't agree. So please stop responding to my posts.


You do know you could just stop responding to mine too right?
hege53190
Head Coach
Posts: 7,334
And1: 2,671
Joined: Nov 29, 2001

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1272 » by hege53190 » Sun May 23, 2021 2:41 pm

M-C-G wrote:
hege53190 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
Here is what I would say, you obviously don’t read what I write because you continually insert all sorts of opinions that I never made to me. We are getting nowhere here, I think largely because you aren’t considering my argument while I am at least considering yours, I just disagree, while you just do whatever you are doing, spewing might be the right word. No worries, we just disagree and probably never will on the topic. Let’s see what happens next


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You are right, we won't agree. So please stop responding to my posts.


You do know you could just stop responding to mine too right?


Sure but you engage me. Not the other way around. Stop. I will try to put you on the list with other posters like David Dunn that are not worth my time to respond to. Good luck with your thoughts.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1273 » by M-C-G » Sun May 23, 2021 3:19 pm

hege53190 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
hege53190 wrote:You are right, we won't agree. So please stop responding to my posts.


You do know you could just stop responding to mine too right?


Sure but you engage me. Not the other way around. Stop. I will try to put you on the list with other posters like David Dunn that are not worth my time to respond to. Good luck with your thoughts.


Do as you must. I just like to talk football and stuff.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,533
And1: 2,325
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1274 » by stillgotgame » Sun May 23, 2021 3:23 pm

sdn40 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
This is based on you knowing the play and route progressions and all adjustments which dictate where Rodgers eyes are at --- of course. Please enlighten us. Or maybe Rodgers should have hit pause and then scanned the field and then hit resume, circle, triangle, square for super boost power and spin move ?


Oh a Madden reference everybody, come look, quick, it is a Madden reference!

Just watching Rodgers with my eyeballs his whole career and looking at about four different angles of the field.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Internet QB's who look at photos and scream about open receivers or running lanes --- yeah totally Madden based, and probably never even stood on a football field, much less experienced the mass hysteria that happens on every play. Pretty much a dead giveaway. Zero concept of what the field of vision peripherally is when standing on the 10 yard line of a 50 yard wide field, much less the eye discipline of the NFL playbook. But as you said - you've watched Rodgers his whole career (wow amazing) - so you're the expert.

For those that really wonder - go stand on the 10 yard line at your local high school field and realize the exact field of view and what it takes to see pylon to pylon.

Now try the impossible. Comprehend 4 seconds filled with a drop back, scrambling, reading the defense, route progressions, adjustments, avoiding a sack, throwing lanes, defenders crossing your field of view, keeping track of the original line of scrimmage, likely scramble drill. All while knowing ahead of time that all defenders who are faster than you are gonna be within 6 yards of the goal line at most. Then some random internet dudes from the comfort of their la z boy says you should have run it in on the far right - per a photo signifying a millisecond of time and space - likely outside your field of view as you were tracking WR's on the inside per the unwritten QB rules that far into the play (angles, cross body, open body, shallow sideline throws with sitting cb's etc etc).


And another guy in a lazy boy thinks a QB who ran a high school level spread offense in college would've done better.
Bucks in 6
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1275 » by M-C-G » Sun May 23, 2021 3:48 pm

stillgotgame wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
Oh a Madden reference everybody, come look, quick, it is a Madden reference!

Just watching Rodgers with my eyeballs his whole career and looking at about four different angles of the field.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Internet QB's who look at photos and scream about open receivers or running lanes --- yeah totally Madden based, and probably never even stood on a football field, much less experienced the mass hysteria that happens on every play. Pretty much a dead giveaway. Zero concept of what the field of vision peripherally is when standing on the 10 yard line of a 50 yard wide field, much less the eye discipline of the NFL playbook. But as you said - you've watched Rodgers his whole career (wow amazing) - so you're the expert.

For those that really wonder - go stand on the 10 yard line at your local high school field and realize the exact field of view and what it takes to see pylon to pylon.

Now try the impossible. Comprehend 4 seconds filled with a drop back, scrambling, reading the defense, route progressions, adjustments, avoiding a sack, throwing lanes, defenders crossing your field of view, keeping track of the original line of scrimmage, likely scramble drill. All while knowing ahead of time that all defenders who are faster than you are gonna be within 6 yards of the goal line at most. Then some random internet dudes from the comfort of their la z boy says you should have run it in on the far right - per a photo signifying a millisecond of time and space - likely outside your field of view as you were tracking WR's on the inside per the unwritten QB rules that far into the play (angles, cross body, open body, shallow sideline throws with sitting cb's etc etc).


And another guy in a lazy boy thinks a QB who ran a high school level spread offense in college would've done better.


And a lazy boy that has watched the QB make that play about a thousand times over the last decade ask the question, why not now?
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,533
And1: 2,325
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1276 » by stillgotgame » Sun May 23, 2021 4:01 pm

M-C-G wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:
sdn40 wrote:
Internet QB's who look at photos and scream about open receivers or running lanes --- yeah totally Madden based, and probably never even stood on a football field, much less experienced the mass hysteria that happens on every play. Pretty much a dead giveaway. Zero concept of what the field of vision peripherally is when standing on the 10 yard line of a 50 yard wide field, much less the eye discipline of the NFL playbook. But as you said - you've watched Rodgers his whole career (wow amazing) - so you're the expert.

For those that really wonder - go stand on the 10 yard line at your local high school field and realize the exact field of view and what it takes to see pylon to pylon.

Now try the impossible. Comprehend 4 seconds filled with a drop back, scrambling, reading the defense, route progressions, adjustments, avoiding a sack, throwing lanes, defenders crossing your field of view, keeping track of the original line of scrimmage, likely scramble drill. All while knowing ahead of time that all defenders who are faster than you are gonna be within 6 yards of the goal line at most. Then some random internet dudes from the comfort of their la z boy says you should have run it in on the far right - per a photo signifying a millisecond of time and space - likely outside your field of view as you were tracking WR's on the inside per the unwritten QB rules that far into the play (angles, cross body, open body, shallow sideline throws with sitting cb's etc etc).


And another guy in a lazy boy thinks a QB who ran a high school level spread offense in college would've done better.


And a lazy boy that has watched the QB make that play about a thousand times over the last decade ask the question, why not now?


You're right, he should have. But that was one play. Others dropped TD passes, fumbled, shouldn't they be responsible? Are we trading them?
Rodgers is the best player on the team. The group of guys on here wanting him gone have no clue how bad we're going to be without him. Mr. five yard out will be lucky to beat out Blake friggin' Bortles.
Do you propose we tank next year, instead of compete for a trophy?
Bucks in 6
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,533
And1: 2,325
Joined: May 27, 2005
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1277 » by stillgotgame » Sun May 23, 2021 4:07 pm

Oh, and our brilliant head coach stood by and watched as we ran a Cover Zero with time running out at the 50 yard line.
No accountability for him?
Bucks in 6
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1278 » by Reddeye » Sun May 23, 2021 5:00 pm

stillgotgame wrote:
You're right, he should have. But that was one play. Others dropped TD passes, fumbled, shouldn't they be responsible? Are we trading them?
Rodgers is the best player on the team. The group of guys on here wanting him gone have no clue how bad we're going to be without him. Mr. five yard out will be lucky to beat out Blake friggin' Bortles.
Do you propose we tank next year, instead of compete for a trophy?


Isn't the reason there is talk about trading Rodgers is because Rodgers wants out? At least that's what the reports are, but he hasn't said so himself. The Packers have so far said they are not trading him.
User avatar
Reddeye
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,713
And1: 465
Joined: Mar 01, 2004

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1279 » by Reddeye » Sun May 23, 2021 5:03 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,526
And1: 9,853
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: 2021 Packers Off Season - Schedule Out 5/12 

Post#1280 » by M-C-G » Sun May 23, 2021 6:51 pm

stillgotgame wrote:
M-C-G wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:
And another guy in a lazy boy thinks a QB who ran a high school level spread offense in college would've done better.


And a lazy boy that has watched the QB make that play about a thousand times over the last decade ask the question, why not now?


You're right, he should have. But that was one play. Others dropped TD passes, fumbled, shouldn't they be responsible? Are we trading them?
Rodgers is the best player on the team. The group of guys on here wanting him gone have no clue how bad we're going to be without him. Mr. five yard out will be lucky to beat out Blake friggin' Bortles.
Do you propose we tank next year, instead of compete for a trophy?

I was and am furious at the missed Adam’s TD and St Brown dropped two. You seem to think I am anti Rodgers but I am not. I’m just over his shot and realize he is not infallible like everyone else.

I’m not sure if people only read 10% of what I wrote or just assume what I wrote based on replies but I can hold multiple people at fault and realize that maybe our all world QB might be better to us by trading him. It’s possible and I say that not knowing if I am correct. Just personally ready to do it based on what I think Rodgers is at.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Return to Green Bay Packers