Suwanee wrote:
Kyrie played much better in game 4. Props to him. But I stand by my point that Boston got into his head. Case in point, he caused more controversy by stepping on Lucky.
They got in his head so much that he dropped 39 points, grabbed 11 rebounds, and helped lead an complete laugher of a blowout win? Maybe it was personal that they said F*** Kyrie for 3 hours, or that in general he has an ill will due to the racist stuff towards players for so long and thats important to him... so yeah, id agree its personal. but the idea the crowd being rowdy negatively impacted his play in either game is kind of absurd.
And that was BEFORE the bottle incident. I don’t care what you think, but that’s just wrong in my book. That’s insulting the whole Boston organization and their history. It’s unjustifiable no matter how you slice it.
And whats wrong with insulting the Boston organization and their history? I mean its littered with racism, beligerence, violence... Lucky is basically a hate symbol if you listen to athletes around the league and their experience with Boston fans.
As far as the bottle, it is effing disgusting that Boston fans are more concerned about a bottle being thrown the tons of current, past, presemt players/coaches from the NBA/MLB including current celtics calling your fan base racist. like if you yourself are not a racist and your big complaint is kyrie and not your fanbase being disproportionately white supremecists somethings is wrong.,