IOW's the Nets said he was done for the Celtics series, but everything I'm reading says he's done for the season.

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Whiskey Slick wrote:IMO he's our 6th man of the year, when he's not starting, so it's a big loss in my view, but even worse is everything I'm reading from medical experts, and I mean some of the most reputable medical sites on the internet, are all pretty much saying the same thing ... that a sprained Plantar Fasciitis takes at least 6 months to fully heal ... and that's the minimum, whereas the maximum is up to 18 months.
IOW's the Nets said he was done for the Celtics series, but everything I'm reading says he's done for the season.
Prokorov wrote:Whiskey Slick wrote:IMO he's our 6th man of the year, when he's not starting, so it's a big loss in my view, but even worse is everything I'm reading from medical experts, and I mean some of the most reputable medical sites on the internet, are all pretty much saying the same thing ... that a sprained Plantar Fasciitis takes at least 6 months to fully heal ... and that's the minimum, whereas the maximum is up to 18 months.
IOW's the Nets said he was done for the Celtics series, but everything I'm reading says he's done for the season.
Plantar Fasciatis is all pain and swelling managment. it isnt something you cant play on. he will get a week of treatment then play on it. it will flare up again at some point. id expect him to be in and out of the lineup all post-season. Duncan played an entire postseason on it one year.
It is a loss, but not a big one. To be Honest, even with some rookie struggles in game 3, id rather claxton have those minutes and with blake we can still go smallball if we want.
Paradise wrote:Game 1 vs Milwaukee starts on Saturday. He’s likely going to at least miss the 1st game.
CalamityX12 wrote:Paradise wrote:Game 1 vs Milwaukee starts on Saturday. He’s likely going to at least miss the 1st game.
Time? Hopefully night
Jta444 wrote:The Nets would be in trouble and might not win it all without Jeff Green. He’s the 4th best player on the team and outside of the Big 3 the most versatile, lengthy, and athletic player on the team. He’s a swiss army-knife and unlike Claxton he’s a vet with playoff experience. Consistent too and plays on both ends.
BUT every team’s kind of banged up anyways. The Lakers’ stars are banged up. Embiid is out right now. Divincenzo is out for the season. So in the end it might not matter too much. But it would be a lot harder without him. Nets are already too small and soft with Jeff Green so without him it makes it much worse. Somebody has to step up in his place. DJ, Claxton, or Shamet.
Prokorov wrote:Jta444 wrote:The Nets would be in trouble and might not win it all without Jeff Green. He’s the 4th best player on the team and outside of the Big 3 the most versatile, lengthy, and athletic player on the team. He’s a swiss army-knife and unlike Claxton he’s a vet with playoff experience. Consistent too and plays on both ends.
BUT every team’s kind of banged up anyways. The Lakers’ stars are banged up. Embiid is out right now. Divincenzo is out for the season. So in the end it might not matter too much. But it would be a lot harder without him. Nets are already too small and soft with Jeff Green so without him it makes it much worse. Somebody has to step up in his place. DJ, Claxton, or Shamet.
Jeff green is not the 4th best player on the team. he may not be in the top 7.
-Big3 + Harris is lock top 4.
-5 is probably Blake.
-6 is probably claxton
-7 is brown or green
Green has been a great role guy. everything he does is replaceable by blake, brown or claxton... and honestly as i said above, its probably a good thing it forces nash to play claxton more, who is far and away our best defender and lob threat
Jta444 wrote:Prokorov wrote:Jta444 wrote:The Nets would be in trouble and might not win it all without Jeff Green. He’s the 4th best player on the team and outside of the Big 3 the most versatile, lengthy, and athletic player on the team. He’s a swiss army-knife and unlike Claxton he’s a vet with playoff experience. Consistent too and plays on both ends.
BUT every team’s kind of banged up anyways. The Lakers’ stars are banged up. Embiid is out right now. Divincenzo is out for the season. So in the end it might not matter too much. But it would be a lot harder without him. Nets are already too small and soft with Jeff Green so without him it makes it much worse. Somebody has to step up in his place. DJ, Claxton, or Shamet.
Jeff green is not the 4th best player on the team. he may not be in the top 7.
-Big3 + Harris is lock top 4.
-5 is probably Blake.
-6 is probably claxton
-7 is brown or green
Green has been a great role guy. everything he does is replaceable by blake, brown or claxton... and honestly as i said above, its probably a good thing it forces nash to play claxton more, who is far and away our best defender and lob threat
All the guys you mentioned are one-way players. Jeff Green is a 2-way player. The 3&D, lengthy, athletic player this team badly needs. Plus his ability to drive to the basket and finish/dunk is very important to this team as no team can just rely on jumpers all day long.
People always say Harris is the 4th best player just look too much into his 3pt shooting as it is the era today but he’s too inconsistent and actually Jeff Green isn’t that far off from him shooting-wise PLUS he can defend Giannis and Middleton on the other end and finish at the rim. That versatility is what the Nets need. There’s enough shooting with the BIG 3.
Jta444 wrote:Prokorov wrote:Jta444 wrote:The Nets would be in trouble and might not win it all without Jeff Green. He’s the 4th best player on the team and outside of the Big 3 the most versatile, lengthy, and athletic player on the team. He’s a swiss army-knife and unlike Claxton he’s a vet with playoff experience. Consistent too and plays on both ends.
BUT every team’s kind of banged up anyways. The Lakers’ stars are banged up. Embiid is out right now. Divincenzo is out for the season. So in the end it might not matter too much. But it would be a lot harder without him. Nets are already too small and soft with Jeff Green so without him it makes it much worse. Somebody has to step up in his place. DJ, Claxton, or Shamet.
Jeff green is not the 4th best player on the team. he may not be in the top 7.
-Big3 + Harris is lock top 4.
-5 is probably Blake.
-6 is probably claxton
-7 is brown or green
Green has been a great role guy. everything he does is replaceable by blake, brown or claxton... and honestly as i said above, its probably a good thing it forces nash to play claxton more, who is far and away our best defender and lob threat
All the guys you mentioned are one-way players. Jeff Green is a 2-way player. The 3&D, lengthy, athletic player this team badly needs. Plus his ability to drive to the basket and finish/dunk is very important to this team as no team can just rely on jumpers all day long.
People always say Harris is the 4th best player just look too much into his 3pt shooting as it is the era today but he’s too inconsistent and actually Jeff Green isn’t that far off from him shooting-wise PLUS he can defend Giannis and Middleton on the other end and finish at the rim. That versatility is what the Nets need. There’s enough shooting with the BIG 3.
Jta444 wrote:
People always say Harris is the 4th best player just look too much into his 3pt shooting as it is the era today but he’s too inconsistent and actually Jeff Green isn’t that far off from him shooting-wise PLUS he can defend Giannis and Middleton on the other end and finish at the rim. That versatility is what the Nets need. There’s enough shooting with the BIG 3.