Montmorencie wrote:Can we find another, third Bogdanovic for the Knicks?
In the last decade, we already found a second Antetokounmpo, a second Holiday, and a second Lopez. The results were not very good.
I will stick with the originals.
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
Montmorencie wrote:Can we find another, third Bogdanovic for the Knicks?
Richard4444 wrote:Montmorencie wrote:Can we find another, third Bogdanovic for the Knicks?
In the last decade, we already found a second Antetokounmpo, a second Holiday, and a second Lopez. The results were not very good.
I will stick with the originals.
Richard4444 wrote:Montmorencie wrote:Can we find another, third Bogdanovic for the Knicks?
In the last decade, we already found a second Antetokounmpo, a second Holiday, and a second Lopez. The results were not very good.
I will stick with the originals.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Montmorencie wrote:If the Bucks grind their way to 2-2... who knows. Rockets were getting demolished by Warriors in the games they lost, but they took the close games and they were going to advance, hadn't been for the CP3 injuries.
spree2kawhi wrote:Montmorencie wrote:If the Bucks grind their way to 2-2... who knows. Rockets were getting demolished by Warriors in the games they lost, but they took the close games and they were going to advance, hadn't been for the CP3 injuries.
Imo the Rockets were never going to advance.
Montmorencie wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Montmorencie wrote:If the Bucks grind their way to 2-2... who knows. Rockets were getting demolished by Warriors in the games they lost, but they took the close games and they were going to advance, hadn't been for the CP3 injuries.
Imo the Rockets were never going to advance.
Based on what? They lost in single digits at home to Warriors, without CP3, jacking up and missing 27 threes in a row. if CP3 is famous for something, it's his cold head. He would have definitely given them few buckets by some smart-ass play by himself.
You never know, but this Rockets team was strong af.
spree2kawhi wrote:Montmorencie wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Imo the Rockets were never going to advance.
Based on what? They lost in single digits at home to Warriors, without CP3, jacking up and missing 27 threes in a row. if CP3 is famous for something, it's his cold head. He would have definitely given them few buckets by some smart-ass play by himself.
You never know, but this Rockets team was strong af.
Ultimately there is no reason to assume he would've won that game for them. And while you say he's mostly known for his cool head, I'd disagree. To me he's mostly known for being a bitch that's routinely been eliminated in the playoffs. You act as if Curry, Klay and so on weren't even there, but they were.
I'm rooting for Phoenix this year, but let's not overrate him only because he's playing very well.
3toheadmelo wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Worst_to_First wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Jazz really have multiple players that can at the same time shoot, defend and create for others.
Also the way they execute at the last 4 minutes of games is top notch.
3toheadmelo wrote:Worst_to_First wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
Jazz really have multiple players that can at the same time shoot, defend and create for others.
Also the way they execute at the last 4 minutes of games is top notch.
Also worth considering they are without Conley. Very strong team all around. Do you think they’re better than Phoenix? That’s a tough one for me.
robillionaire wrote:Kawhi is leaving this seals the deal folks
3toheadmelo wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Utah gives me a glimmer of hope that the Knicks can build a legitimately good team if they trade for or sign Zach Lavine while keeping their core intact.
I think Lavine is the epitome of a player who's never been in the right situation. But his scoring efficiency is elite, he's a dynamic and fluid perimeter player in the mold of Mitchell (perhaps not as good), Murray or Booker. He's just not a floor raiser, but add him to a solid core of players with a strong defensive identity and he elevates your ceiling significantly.
Lavine-Randle-RJ is the only way to go if you're neither team tank or team Dameism.
Fury wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Utah gives me a glimmer of hope that the Knicks can build a legitimately good team if they trade for or sign Zach Lavine while keeping their core intact.
I think Lavine is the epitome of a player who's never been in the right situation. But his scoring efficiency is elite, he's a dynamic and fluid perimeter player in the mold of Mitchell (perhaps not as good), Murray or Booker. He's just not a floor raiser, but add him to a solid core of players with a strong defensive identity and he elevates your ceiling significantly.
Lavine-Randle-RJ is the only way to go if you're neither team tank or team Dameism.
I think he'd be great but I don't think Chicago is going to trade him and if they wanted to trade him, we don't have much to offer.