daoneandonly wrote:XTraderXL wrote:daoneandonly wrote:
The point is you win, you lose some. Anybody in Dallas' position would have made that trade. We ended up losing it sucks, but its not like some obvious gaffe. Dallas has done that many times before, the Jason Kidd to PHX tarde, the Jamal mashburn trade, the Jim jackson trade, so on and so forth. heck, giving up 2 picks in the KP trade was far worse than the J Rich for Seth trade.
That was hardly your initial point or else you would have said it. I asked because your argument was basically that Curry is playing well against a young team. I actually agree with your latter explanation but I still think the FO needs to be criticised for every bad move they make. These guys are paid millions to do a job for which they have practically unlimited resources to help them make the right decisions and they still do a bad job.
And another thing. I was all for the KP trade as I believed the fable of Casey Smith being the best athletic trainer in the league so surely he had to be positive that KPs health will hold up. Well, apparently the guy is not the best as KP is perpetually injured and is physically a different man while in his physical prime. So all this talk about how good the Mavs training staff is was completely wrong if they missed so badly on KP. This whole organization is on the level of the Kings right now. The only good thing they have going for them at this moment is Luka who is dragging them into playoffs. They are a lottery team with any other player as a #1, outside of other 5-6 guys in the league who would/will never want to come to Dallas.
The point still stands, his defense was part of the reaosn he got traded. He has 2 defensive player of the year candidates as teammates and they're getting slapped around by a team of guys in their first ever postseason. So he's not some superstar we're desperately missing, he's still a liability on D, always has been, always will be.
So you think it was a good trade for the Mavs. Got it













