Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
minimus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,839
- And1: 5,309
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
When do you expect MIN trade? During draft night? Right after FAs market will open?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,575
- And1: 31,048
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Jake Layman will be traded with a second for nothing, if no other trade materializes. I am 95% sure.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
shrink wrote:I personally don’t value Simmons highly, with injury risk, confidence issues, and because he hasn’t been able to improve his shooting in the last several years. His contract, which is greater than the typical max, magnifies that risk. But I still think we will see a trade where PHI gets a good package.
The issue here is that the final price for Simmons won’t be the consensus, or the average. PHI only cares about the highest offer. Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package). However, Dane Moore talked to two NBA execs, and they said that if KAT and Edwards aren’t in a deal, it would take two picks (which would be sent elsewhere to get PHI win-now talent). Some GM’s — maybe even Rosas — need to get some wins or they may lose their job, and he would be more helpful (at least, in the regular season), than future picks.
Anyway, if 27 teams think he is low value, and 2 teams think he is great, those two will try to outbid each other, and PHI will get a good return. I think this is the likely end result - PHI will trade him this summer, and get a decent return.
I just hope MIN isn’t the team that overpays for him.
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Merc_Porto wrote:shrink wrote:Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package).
Wasn't about Houston liking Simmons or not.
Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta refused to send him to Daryl Morey's 76ers. Everybody knows that.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
SO_MONEY
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Nick K wrote:shrink wrote:I personally don’t value Simmons highly, with injury risk, confidence issues, and because he hasn’t been able to improve his shooting in the last several years. His contract, which is greater than the typical max, magnifies that risk. But I still think we will see a trade where PHI gets a good package.
The issue here is that the final price for Simmons won’t be the consensus, or the average. PHI only cares about the highest offer. Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package). However, Dane Moore talked to two NBA execs, and they said that if KAT and Edwards aren’t in a deal, it would take two picks (which would be sent elsewhere to get PHI win-now talent). Some GM’s — maybe even Rosas — need to get some wins or they may lose their job, and he would be more helpful (at least, in the regular season), than future picks.
Anyway, if 27 teams think he is low value, and 2 teams think he is great, those two will try to outbid each other, and PHI will get a good return. I think this is the likely end result - PHI will trade him this summer, and get a decent return.
I just hope MIN isn’t the team that overpays for him.
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
Pass. I don't like the depth past 4 or 5 in this draft.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Calinks
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 50,422
- And1: 17,379
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
I think Beasley will have a high trade value this year. The issues muddy the waters a bit but I think shooters are so extremely valued right now, teams won't care if they feel like they can add a really good one. Not saying Rosas will deal him for sure but I could see Rosas really thinking Beasley is a valuable asset and he could keep him until he thinks his value is highest and then cash him in.
I think a lot of teams will be desperate for high-level shooting talent to put them over the top, hell the Sixers could very much use a Beasley type outside of Curry. Contending teams will want that kind of player, I could even see Buddy Hield having some value and he is on a huge contract.
I think a lot of teams will be desperate for high-level shooting talent to put them over the top, hell the Sixers could very much use a Beasley type outside of Curry. Contending teams will want that kind of player, I could even see Buddy Hield having some value and he is on a huge contract.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,704
- And1: 19,805
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Nick K wrote:Merc_Porto wrote:shrink wrote:Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package).
Wasn't about Houston liking Simmons or not.
Rockets owner Tilman Fertitta refused to send him to Daryl Morey's 76ers. Everybody knows that.
Who could blame him!?
Meh. This really sounds like speculation to me, finding a way to blame the team’s biggest villain for why they didn’t get Simmons. It would take a lot of evidence for me to believe it, and I certainly understand a simpler explanation — HOU (or any team) might have some concerns about adding Ben Simmons salary, lack of growth and mental toughness. I think with Simmons’ high highs, and low lows, that his value could be all over the board if you talked to several different buyers. Simmons requires a GM to build an entire team around him to maximize his strengths and reduce his deficits, and I can see how HOU would be reluctant to make that big of a franchise commitment right now.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Domejandro wrote:Jake Layman will be traded with a second for nothing, if no other trade materializes. I am 95% sure.
Makes total complete sense.
Juancho and Okogie need to go too.
What about trying to trade up to get the #6 pick for Scottie Barnes for ou PF position. He'd be perfect.
What would it take?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
SO_MONEY wrote:Nick K wrote:shrink wrote:I personally don’t value Simmons highly, with injury risk, confidence issues, and because he hasn’t been able to improve his shooting in the last several years. His contract, which is greater than the typical max, magnifies that risk. But I still think we will see a trade where PHI gets a good package.
The issue here is that the final price for Simmons won’t be the consensus, or the average. PHI only cares about the highest offer. Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package). However, Dane Moore talked to two NBA execs, and they said that if KAT and Edwards aren’t in a deal, it would take two picks (which would be sent elsewhere to get PHI win-now talent). Some GM’s — maybe even Rosas — need to get some wins or they may lose their job, and he would be more helpful (at least, in the regular season), than future picks.
Anyway, if 27 teams think he is low value, and 2 teams think he is great, those two will try to outbid each other, and PHI will get a good return. I think this is the likely end result - PHI will trade him this summer, and get a decent return.
I just hope MIN isn’t the team that overpays for him.
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
Pass. I don't like the depth past 4 or 5 in this draft.
Take another look at Scottie Barnes. He is THE guy.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,704
- And1: 19,805
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Over on the trade board, someone suggested
Malik Beasley + Juancho for Josh Richardson and Dorian Finley-Smith
Whadayathink?
Malik Beasley + Juancho for Josh Richardson and Dorian Finley-Smith
Whadayathink?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
TheProdigy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,443
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Nick K wrote:shrink wrote:I personally don’t value Simmons highly, with injury risk, confidence issues, and because he hasn’t been able to improve his shooting in the last several years. His contract, which is greater than the typical max, magnifies that risk. But I still think we will see a trade where PHI gets a good package.
The issue here is that the final price for Simmons won’t be the consensus, or the average. PHI only cares about the highest offer. Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package). However, Dane Moore talked to two NBA execs, and they said that if KAT and Edwards aren’t in a deal, it would take two picks (which would be sent elsewhere to get PHI win-now talent). Some GM’s — maybe even Rosas — need to get some wins or they may lose their job, and he would be more helpful (at least, in the regular season), than future picks.
Anyway, if 27 teams think he is low value, and 2 teams think he is great, those two will try to outbid each other, and PHI will get a good return. I think this is the likely end result - PHI will trade him this summer, and get a decent return.
I just hope MIN isn’t the team that overpays for him.
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
I know most of the mocks currently have Scottie Barnes falling to #6 but that's probably going to change. His combine measurements show that he is an absolute freak. It wouldn't surprise me if he's in discussion for top 3 once the draft rolls around.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Worm Guts
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 27,513
- And1: 12,388
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
The only way we’re getting a lottery pick this year is if we decide to trade Towns.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Baseline81
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,282
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Jan 18, 2009
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
shrink wrote:Over on the trade board, someone suggested
Malik Beasley + Juancho for Josh Richardson and Dorian Finley-Smith
Whadayathink?
No, I value Beasley higher than trading him for expiring contracts.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
SO_MONEY
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Nick K wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:Nick K wrote:
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
Pass. I don't like the depth past 4 or 5 in this draft.
Take another look at Scottie Barnes. He is THE guy.
I did and no way do I trade a future pick or Beasley.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Dewey
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,922
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Very few people in this league deserve a max … 3/4ths of the max contracts do not correlate with performance. Therefore most trades are melely two teams swapping spot trying to keep fans happy with a change. None of them care that they all overpaid these louses to start with
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
Neeva
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,589
- And1: 2,949
- Joined: Jun 03, 2016
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
TheProdigy wrote:Nick K wrote:shrink wrote:I personally don’t value Simmons highly, with injury risk, confidence issues, and because he hasn’t been able to improve his shooting in the last several years. His contract, which is greater than the typical max, magnifies that risk. But I still think we will see a trade where PHI gets a good package.
The issue here is that the final price for Simmons won’t be the consensus, or the average. PHI only cares about the highest offer. Now there are certainly teams out there that don’t like Simmons (HOU for sure, refusing to take him in a Harden deal over a pretty mediocre package). However, Dane Moore talked to two NBA execs, and they said that if KAT and Edwards aren’t in a deal, it would take two picks (which would be sent elsewhere to get PHI win-now talent). Some GM’s — maybe even Rosas — need to get some wins or they may lose their job, and he would be more helpful (at least, in the regular season), than future picks.
Anyway, if 27 teams think he is low value, and 2 teams think he is great, those two will try to outbid each other, and PHI will get a good return. I think this is the likely end result - PHI will trade him this summer, and get a decent return.
I just hope MIN isn’t the team that overpays for him.
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
I know most of the mocks currently have Scottie Barnes falling to #6 but that's probably going to change. His combine measurements show that he is an absolute freak. It wouldn't surprise me if he's in discussion for top 3 once the draft rolls around.
Cant shoot at all, and cant make free throws...
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
TheProdigy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,443
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Neeva wrote:TheProdigy wrote:Nick K wrote:
Right!
The good news is the Wolves are an up and coming team. We went 10-9 the last 19 games with Dlo back. So we don't have to overpay for a deal here. How about try to get the #6 pick in the draft for Scottie Barnes? He'd be perfect. I'd give up Rubio or Beasley plus a first next year if it could be done. #6 is not like a top 3 pick.
The point is we have options to fill that PF position. I trust Rosas to do the right thing. Overall, I think he's done a remarkable job.
I know most of the mocks currently have Scottie Barnes falling to #6 but that's probably going to change. His combine measurements show that he is an absolute freak. It wouldn't surprise me if he's in discussion for top 3 once the draft rolls around.
Cant shoot at all, and cant make free throws...
Neither can Jonathan Kuminga and he's been consensus top 5 in mocks.
All of these prospects have holes in their games. Barnes is only a freshman so the hope is that he can improve in the areas you noted. You can't teach his length and athleticism. He looks like a true 1-5 switchable defender. He's also got great handles and passing instincts for his size.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
SO_MONEY
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
TheProdigy wrote:Neeva wrote:TheProdigy wrote:I know most of the mocks currently have Scottie Barnes falling to #6 but that's probably going to change. His combine measurements show that he is an absolute freak. It wouldn't surprise me if he's in discussion for top 3 once the draft rolls around.
Cant shoot at all, and cant make free throws...
Neither can Jonathan Kuminga and he's been consensus top 5 in mocks.
All of these prospects have holes in their games. Barnes is only a freshman so the hope is that he can improve in the areas you noted. You can't teach his length and athleticism. He looks like a true 1-5 switchable defender. He's also got great handles and passing instincts for his size.
Which is why this draft is 4 deep and there is a massive drop off. Last year there was a ton of depth as far as role players, this draft seems weak. I wouldn't trade Beasley for a pick outside the top 4 and no team in the top 4 would move a pick for Beasley. I also don't think I would trade a future pick either, that is how big of a drop off I think there is
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
TheProdigy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,443
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
SO_MONEY wrote:TheProdigy wrote:Neeva wrote:
Cant shoot at all, and cant make free throws...
Neither can Jonathan Kuminga and he's been consensus top 5 in mocks.
All of these prospects have holes in their games. Barnes is only a freshman so the hope is that he can improve in the areas you noted. You can't teach his length and athleticism. He looks like a true 1-5 switchable defender. He's also got great handles and passing instincts for his size.
Which is why this draft is 4 deep and there is a massive drop off. Last year there was a ton of depth as far as role players, this draft seems weak. I wouldn't trade Beasley for a pick outside the top 4 and no team in the top 4 would move a pick for Beasley. I also don't think I would trade a future pick either, that is how big of a drop off I think there is
Couple of things about your Beasley valuation:
1. He's pretty one dimensional although the one thing he does well (shooting) is in high demand.
2. He has a track record of very questionable decision making. He's one more mistake away from a pretty serious league suspension or worse, a lengthy prison sentence.
If someone offers the #5 pick for Beasley, you take it and run.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
-
TheProdigy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,443
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Feb 21, 2001
Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven)
Duplicate post.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



