ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Seven)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#401 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:24 pm

Note30 wrote:If we trade for Simmons and dont send out DLO we will have three flawed incomplete players at a 30m dollar level.

I dont get what the obsession here is. If we want a facilitator who can't finish or shoot and is a great floor general we already have Rubio. Simmons is just a 6'10 fusion of Rubio and Okogie.

Agreed 100%. If we can get him for cheap with guys like Beasley, Rubio, Juancho, then fine. I don't want to give up a bunch of picks, and definitely not going to trade Edwards or McDaniels for him. I'm tired of giving up future picks. If we're strapping ourselves by having 3 max deals, we need those to find young and cheap talent. Okogie, Reid, Nowell, Culver. I know the 76ers will want more, but that's fine. I don't think Simmons would be best utilized here with KAT, Edwards, and Dlo all needing the ball already.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#402 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:30 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:
Note30 wrote:If we trade for Simmons and dont send out DLO we will have three flawed incomplete players at a 30m dollar level.

I dont get what the obsession here is. If we want a facilitator who can't finish or shoot and is a great floor general we already have Rubio. Simmons is just a 6'10 fusion of Rubio and Okogie.

Agreed 100%. If we can get him for cheap with guys like Beasley, Rubio, Juancho, then fine. I don't want to give up a bunch of picks, and definitely not going to trade Edwards or McDaniels for him. I'm tired of giving up future picks. If we're strapping ourselves by having 3 max deals, we need those to find young and cheap talent. Okogie, Reid, Nowell, Culver. I know the 76ers will want more, but that's fine. I don't think Simmons would be best utilized here with KAT, Edwards, and Dlo all needing the ball already.

Two of those are a second rounder and undrafted. Don't need 1sts to find young and cheap talent.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#403 » by moss_is_1 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 6:35 pm

Klomp wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:
Note30 wrote:If we trade for Simmons and dont send out DLO we will have three flawed incomplete players at a 30m dollar level.

I dont get what the obsession here is. If we want a facilitator who can't finish or shoot and is a great floor general we already have Rubio. Simmons is just a 6'10 fusion of Rubio and Okogie.

Agreed 100%. If we can get him for cheap with guys like Beasley, Rubio, Juancho, then fine. I don't want to give up a bunch of picks, and definitely not going to trade Edwards or McDaniels for him. I'm tired of giving up future picks. If we're strapping ourselves by having 3 max deals, we need those to find young and cheap talent. Okogie, Reid, Nowell, Culver. I know the 76ers will want more, but that's fine. I don't think Simmons would be best utilized here with KAT, Edwards, and Dlo all needing the ball already.

Two of those are a second rounder and undrafted. Don't need 1sts to find young and cheap talent.

I understand that, need all the shots possible is what I'm saying though. If we're trading away most of our future for a player so flawed, while our other 2 max players are also very flawed then you'd better have confidence in it coming together.
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,277
And1: 1,909
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#404 » by Baseline81 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:17 pm

Read on Twitter
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,748
And1: 1,968
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#405 » by jpatrick » Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:37 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#406 » by SO_MONEY » Mon Jul 12, 2021 9:39 pm

jpatrick wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.


I wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons straight up given his salary and limitations. McDaniels has more value to us given he can shoot and projects as an elite defender (if not already) and he is cheap. I hope Rosas understands McDaniels is a stud and a keeper, a player to build around. I would have to think he gets this.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#407 » by Nick K » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:08 pm

Note30 wrote:If we trade for Simmons and dont send out DLO we will have three flawed incomplete players at a 30m dollar level.

I dont get what the obsession here is. If we want a facilitator who can't finish or shoot and is a great floor general we already have Rubio. Simmons is just a 6'10 fusion of Rubio and Okogie.


Did you notice how many +1's you have?

I couldn't agree more. Looks like many others agree too.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#408 » by Nick K » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:14 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.


I wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons straight up given his salary and limitations. McDaniels has more value to us given he can shoot and projects as an elite defender (if not already) and he is cheap. I hope Rosas understands McDaniels is a stud and a keeper, a player to build around. I would have to think he gets this.


No one was a bigger Simmons fan than me coming out of the draft. The guy has not improved one iota since.

I really believe McD will be a better over all player than Simmons in 2-3 years. He is untouchable in my book. McD will be a great SF.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#409 » by SO_MONEY » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:16 pm

Nick K wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.


I wouldn't trade McDaniels for Simmons straight up given his salary and limitations. McDaniels has more value to us given he can shoot and projects as an elite defender (if not already) and he is cheap. I hope Rosas understands McDaniels is a stud and a keeper, a player to build around. I would have to think he gets this.


No one was a bigger Simmons fan than me coming out of the draft. The guy has not improved one iota since.

I really believe McD will be a better over all player than Simmons in 2-3 years. He is untouchable in my book. McD will be a great SF.


This.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,918
And1: 1,080
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#410 » by Dewey » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:25 pm

jpatrick wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.

I’m not against bringing in Simmons via trade… But I do fear our willingness to overpay with future assets - specifically draft picks. Simmons can help though overpaid, but I’d still move Beasley/Rubio for him and call it a day. Not big on adding in much else. See where that takes us for a year and go from there…
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#411 » by Krapinsky » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:31 pm

The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.

Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.

Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.

As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Neeva
General Manager
Posts: 7,568
And1: 2,932
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#412 » by Neeva » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:38 pm

They aint getring mcdaniels the biggest steal in last years draft. Nice one.
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#413 » by SO_MONEY » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:56 pm

Krapinsky wrote:The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.

Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.

Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.

As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.


I don't think Simmons is worthy of being an all-star and probably benefited from market size when named. He has demonstrated what he is and it is not awful, but at 35mil I am not going heap praise on the guy and would rather keep the MUCH cheaper option that can shoot and already based on several metrics was a top defensive player as a rookie. And BTW McDaniels doesn't need to be an "all-star" or whatever to be more beneficial to us...this is not apples to apples, there is a MASSIVE difference in salary. Again, I take the cheaper guy that can shoot. I don't really value Simmons playing making because I don't want the ball in his hands...just saying.

Simmons is also not getting a star in return without attaching tons of value, Simmons is only a star in name and I feel people are wise to that.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#414 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 12, 2021 10:57 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter

That last graph is the key. There's a difference between off-limits and "wouldn't include in deal for specific player." Just because McDaniels or Russell are not off-limits doesn't mean they'll be in the trade.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,754
And1: 23,084
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#415 » by Klomp » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:00 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.

Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.

Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.

As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.


I don't think Simmons is worthy of being an all-star and probably benefited from market size when named. He has demonstrated what he is and it is not awful, but at 35mil I am not going heap praise on the guy and would rather keep the MUCH cheaper option that can shoot and already based on several metrics was a top defensive player as a rookie. And BTW McDaniels doesn't need to be an "all-star" or whatever to be more beneficial to us...this is not apples to apples, there is a MASSIVE difference in salary. Again, I take the cheaper guy that can shoot. I don't really value Simmons playing making because I don't want the ball in his hands...just saying.

You think coaches care about market size when picking reserves?

As for "not awful".....

On Tuesday night, by virtue of his 20-point, 11-rebound, nine-assist effort, Simmons became the second fastest player in NBA history to join an exclusive club: 2,000 points, 1,000 rebounds and 1,000 assists.

The young Aussie entered the contest with 1,993 points, and broke the 2,000-point threshold on a free throw with 3:59 remaining in the game’s second quarter.

At that moment, Simmons became the second fastest player to reach the milestone, trailing only Oscar Robertson. It took Simmons just 125 games to join the club, nine games faster than Magic Johnson and 33 games faster than Simmons’ friend, LeBron James.


https://sixerswire.usatoday.com/2019/01/17/ben-simmons-became-2nd-fastest-in-nba-history-to-join-exclusive-club/
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
SO_MONEY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,799
And1: 1,032
Joined: Sep 11, 2009
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#416 » by SO_MONEY » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:03 pm

Klomp wrote:
SO_MONEY wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.

Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.

Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.

As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.


I don't think Simmons is worthy of being an all-star and probably benefited from market size when named. He has demonstrated what he is and it is not awful, but at 35mil I am not going heap praise on the guy and would rather keep the MUCH cheaper option that can shoot and already based on several metrics was a top defensive player as a rookie. And BTW McDaniels doesn't need to be an "all-star" or whatever to be more beneficial to us...this is not apples to apples, there is a MASSIVE difference in salary. Again, I take the cheaper guy that can shoot. I don't really value Simmons playing making because I don't want the ball in his hands...just saying.

You think coaches care about market size when picking reserves?


Yes, I think the NBA and "coaches" conciser market size and potential ratings and are on the same page.
Chello1
Junior
Posts: 476
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#417 » by Chello1 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:14 pm

Simmons is a negative contract period. You do not overpay for that. If you deal for him and include two future pics you are locking this roster in for years. I do not like giving up picks and players for negative contracts. Take his name off for a minute and what would you give for him?

he is 16-8-8 on less than 60% on both free throws and shooting percentages and plays good defense.......

We are going to have to vastly overpay to get him so I hope we pass and look at cheaper wiser players like Sexton or Turner to add this summer. In a year we may say we are ready to add a big fish:I hope we keep growing this and keep our doors open on different ways to improve and not tie ourselves to a 30 plus million salary yet!
Baseline81
Analyst
Posts: 3,277
And1: 1,909
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#418 » by Baseline81 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:21 pm

Krapinsky wrote:The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.

Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.

Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.

As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.

Clearly you do not understand. It's either championship or tank, there is no in between...

Please note this was sarcasm.
Madd Squabbles
Junior
Posts: 472
And1: 192
Joined: Jun 27, 2008

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#419 » by Madd Squabbles » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:25 pm

jpatrick wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.


Pump up Simmons by saying he isn't going to trade anything of value for him? Bottom line is you have to give something to get something. Getting Simmons will cost ya Edwards.
Chello1
Junior
Posts: 476
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#420 » by Chello1 » Mon Jul 12, 2021 11:34 pm

Madd Squabbles wrote:
jpatrick wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Losing my guy McDaniels would hurt.

The fact that all of this is clearly being leaked to the local guys still makes me wonder if this is just Rosas doing his close friend Morey a favor by attempting to pump up Simmons’ value somewhat. Simmons is getting killed publicly. For someone so clearly psychologically fragile, one has to wonder what things like the ESPY skit will do to him.


Pump up Simmons by saying he isn't going to trade anything of value for him? Bottom line is you have to give something to get something. Getting Simmons will cost ya Edwards.


Then you quickly hang up and move on. Not in a million years do you give up Antman.....

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves