Krapinsky wrote:The Simmons hate has gone a little overboard here. Did he do poorly in the spotlight of the playoffs? Totally. But he still helped get his team there, which is more so than any Wolves player can say this side of the millennium outside of Jimmy Butler.
Simmons is a three-time all star, all-NBA third teamer, and all defense first teamer. McDaniel's has shown some glimpses of promise sure but he hasn't shown anything close to that level of promise no matter what flavor of koolaid you're drinking.
Simmons for Rubio, Beasley, McDaniels, and Two #1's is probably what we would have to offer and I still think Philadephia says no because they would be much better off trading him for a package with a star player coming back in return in order to keep them in title contention.
As an aside, I'm not sure how we'd be able to pay Towns, Simmons, Ant, and D-Lo all at the same time but I suppose we can worry about that problem later.
I don't think Simmons is worthy of being an all-star and probably benefited from market size when named. He has demonstrated what he is and it is not awful, but at 35mil I am not going heap praise on the guy and would rather keep the MUCH cheaper option that can shoot and already based on several metrics was a top defensive player as a rookie. And BTW McDaniels doesn't need to be an "all-star" or whatever to be more beneficial to us...this is not apples to apples, there is a MASSIVE difference in salary. Again, I take the cheaper guy that can shoot. I don't really value Simmons playing making because I don't want the ball in his hands...just saying.
Simmons is also not getting a star in return without attaching tons of value, Simmons is only a star in name and I feel people are wise to that.