K_chile22 wrote:Nope, rockets were way over the cap and the protections were made better for Detroit. It was definitely a stinky transaction, especially because the first trade made little sense. I kinda think it was tampering. Especially because the way his contract broke as being 3/$27M but that got shut down and he later signed with them for real at a bigger number. Makes me think they agreed to a number before everything started, then he saw how much dudes like Grant and Plumlee were getting and wanted moreHartfordWhalers wrote:chrbal wrote:
Stewart not Bey. Pistons Rockets agreed to trade 16 to Detroit for a future first with varying protections. It was later edited to become a sign and trade, with the protections changed to in Detroit’s favor. It was odd, but if something was done illegally they both worked hard to make it seem lik It wasn’t.
I don’t believe the protections were made better for Detroit.
If I recall correctly, Houston did not need the sign and trade, they had the cap space and could have signed Wood outright to the deal he signed.
Detroit on the other hand needed the sign and trade to sign other free agents.
Edit: protections originally were reported to be 16/16/16/16/10/10/9
And were modified to be 16/16/18/18/13/11/9
The first trade was Detroit getting #16 for a future protected 1st plus taking on Ariza's dead weight money (which had the value on a later 1st anyway). IMO I felt that this was a slight value win for Houston giving the difficulty of getting immediate salary relief early in the offseason.
The initial reported contract for Wood (3/27) was based on him signing an MLE deal with Houston. This wouldn't have needed a S&T.
Then they put the two together, slightly modifying the pick protection slightly to get a larger contract for Wood.


























