bigfoot wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Frank Lee wrote:Am I the only one that sees Paul as the one that’s mucking up our future ? Enigs is right. Go ahead and pay him his contract price this year… But from then out, he’s yr to yr at the MLE. It helps put a better team around him… And if he doesn’t like that… we move in the new younger CP.
I’m very leery of last legging vets, especially expensive ones.
No, I have felt that way since we traded for him and wished we had addressed PG of the future. However, I don't see a better alternative. I hope he opts in and I would also prefer that.
I wouldn't want him to walk though if we wouldn't give him more than 1 year and NY was giving him 3/90. I've watched this team be bad enough that I would prefer to pay him a year extra when he was declining to not having him at all.
Don't forget, before that last game Payne was horrible in the finals. Shooting 40% and 25% the first 5 games. A 44% TS%.
Payne can get this team to the playoffs (I think) but we would be a low seed barring a bunch of injuries to other teams...but if he got hurt we've seen how good we are without a PG. Rubio couldn't get us to the playoffs. Payne might be better....but I am not sure I'd go that far.
The LA teams, GS, Utah, Denver, Dallas and possibly Portland would probably all be better than us without Paul. And maybe Memphis...they were missing JJJ all year and Ja and others for a lot of it and still go the 8 seed.
Ultimately, I probably offer him a $20 year 1 year extension for him to opt in...maybe $25...unless he would opt in without it. But if he was going to sign with the Knicks unless we gave him 3 years I'd rather go that route. I'm sure we will have a plan in place after that...and even a severely declining CP3 is better than most anyone. He was 4th in MVP and had his best season in like 5 years and shot the hell out of the ball in the finals while averaging over 8 assists per game against an extremely tough defense.
Without him we would have been swept in the finals no question. Ayton played well but Book shot 38% and 12.5% from 3. Ayton had a big game with 22/19. He was solid in game 2 as well...held us in there until Book got hot in the 2nd half. In the 3rd it was tough because Book shot 21%. He was poor in game 4 though. Keyed our comeback in game 5 and kept us in there in game 6. Can't really let him go just yet.
CP3 at 35 got us to the finals. Nash at 35 lost in the WCF. Afterward, Nash put in two more quality seasons for the Suns before he was traded to the Lakers. Get Paul to opt-in and offer him 27M for year two and 25M for year 3 which would be a team option with some guaranteed money ($7M). That's a 100M contract of which $80M is guaranteed. The worst case is he becomes a super bench sub ala Melo, Derrick Rose, Milsap, Griffin, etc.
Yeah, that's what I've said often. That's they way I'd d it if they are going for around a 3/100 deal..opt in with declining extension.
While I was worried a lot that he would decline in his 2nd year (next year) and maybe deal with injuries this year given his history of injuries and age, he was a lot more healthy than I expected (except unfortunately got a weird shoulder/arm injury and broken hand ligaments in the playoffs along with COVID) but I think since he has gone Vegan and really gotten healthy with his diet much like Nash did, his body has a lot better chance of holding out.
Of course anyone could have a freak injury at any time as we've seen across the league, so if he has one it's likely not due to age or having played too much.
So given that he held up so well and played his best season in years, I don't have a big issue with paying him. I am a little worried about a third year and possibly a 2nd. I honestly don't think we'd find a better option.
My bigger issue is not having taken Haliburton. It may be hard to find a decent guy at 29 and then we likely don't have a pick next year.
Nash was actually a bit older..a few months...he did go down to 75 games in 2010-11 and then 62 in 2011-12 and then 50 his first year with the Lakers and then 15.
It is interesting to think how much we got for a 38 year old Nash.