ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Seven)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,256
And1: 1,932
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#761 » by Note30 » Tue Jul 27, 2021 5:56 pm

SO_MONEY wrote:
Neeva wrote:I think Siakam will regress and become washed a lot faster than Raptors hoped.


Kind of seems like it.


I think it's because he's been forced into essentially the number one option.

He's a great 2nd/3rd option

If anything we could definitely get him for cheaper then.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,087
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#762 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:01 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Whispers of Gallinari, Markannen, now McDermott? It seems clear that Finch wants a shooter and goal will be to outscore our opponents rather than try to stop them.

There have been a lot of whispers, I wouldn't necessarily make any overarching judgments about how they want to build the team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#763 » by IceManBK1 » Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:17 pm

Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,256
And1: 1,932
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#764 » by Note30 » Tue Jul 27, 2021 6:23 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10008811-kyle-lowry-rumors-knicks-eye-star-pg-would-consider-25m-30m-annual-76ers-contract

How about we help raptors get Simmons and 76ers get lowry and we get Siakamm


Down so long as we don't send any big players out

Beasley, Juancho, Culver, Layman and a 1st UFRP and all the 2nds

That way we can trade Dlo for someone decent.

Not gonna lie if SGA is available then we should probably target him.
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#765 » by moonpie » Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:04 pm

Would have to be two separate deals or wait until August 14th, but how about something like this?

MIN gets: Eric Bledsoe, Brandon Clarke
MEM gets: Ricky Rubio, Jarrett Culver, 2022 2nd round pick (can also add Jaylen Nowell if needed)


Clarke was barely in the rotation by season's end last year with the return of JJJ, but I think he could be a great fit with us. Bledsoe has another year left on his contract as opposed to Ricky's expiring, so we punt that trade contract to the following season, but he's serviceable enough as a backup, veteran guard with some defensive chops.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,578
And1: 6,671
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#766 » by shangrila » Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:42 pm

Klomp wrote:Do your thing Gersson

One interesting side note: The Pelicans now have picks No. 35, 43, 51 and 53 on Thursday, and I don’t think they’re planning on selecting four players for the roster. I’d expect them to sell or trade at least one of the picks and take a stash pick with at least one of the others.

https://theathletic.com/2731911/2021/07/26/grizzlies-pelicans-trade-an-odd-match-of-patience-and-urgency-hollinger/

Probably selling the 50s, at which point do we even care?
IceManBK1
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 330
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#767 » by IceManBK1 » Tue Jul 27, 2021 9:52 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=20

I'd make a run at Hield and Bagley if kings would take any combo of Rubio, Beasley, Huancho, and Culver. No picks given up.
Dlo
Edwards
McDaniels
Bagley
Towns

Use Hields as 6th man instant firepower off the bench.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,578
And1: 6,671
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#768 » by shangrila » Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:02 pm

moonpie wrote:Would have to be two separate deals or wait until August 14th, but how about something like this?

MIN gets: Eric Bledsoe, Brandon Clarke
MEM gets: Ricky Rubio, Jarrett Culver, 2022 2nd round pick (can also add Jaylen Nowell if needed)


Clarke was barely in the rotation by season's end last year with the return of JJJ, but I think he could be a great fit with us. Bledsoe has another year left on his contract as opposed to Ricky's expiring, so we punt that trade contract to the following season, but he's serviceable enough as a backup, veteran guard with some defensive chops.

That's actually interesting. I wouldn't include Nowell, especially with Clarke coming off a poor year.

The question would be whether Bledsoe would be interested in reporting. He's apparently not showing up to Memphis, so it might take promising him a starting spot. Which I'd consider, honestly, at least until the deadline where we've hopefully pumped his value up a bit.
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,888
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#769 » by karch34 » Tue Jul 27, 2021 10:16 pm

moonpie wrote:Would have to be two separate deals or wait until August 14th, but how about something like this?

MIN gets: Eric Bledsoe, Brandon Clarke
MEM gets: Ricky Rubio, Jarrett Culver, 2022 2nd round pick (can also add Jaylen Nowell if needed)


Clarke was barely in the rotation by season's end last year with the return of JJJ, but I think he could be a great fit with us. Bledsoe has another year left on his contract as opposed to Ricky's expiring, so we punt that trade contract to the following season, but he's serviceable enough as a backup, veteran guard with some defensive chops.


I could see Bledsoe similarly to Gallo interest if we're trying to keep a salary slot on the books to combine with other pieces if we don't make the "big" trade this offseason. Tough though as Rubio, Jauncho, and Culver would/could all come off the books next year so do you keep or acquire bigger contacts in hope you can flip it down the road or get to the point where you could at least offer a full MLE and not be over the hard cap?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,661
And1: 19,764
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#770 » by shrink » Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:03 pm

I like the concept, but not the value so much.

The Grizzlies are active, and after the last trade, Justine Winslow will be gone. They can’t be too high on Brandon Clarke right now, and he’s already 24. He could be useful here, but he’s not a good three point shooter and he’s only 6’ 8” with really short arms (6’ 8” wingspan). I don’t think we want him as our starting PF.

There is a difference in value between Rubio and Bledsoe too, even without Ricky’s mentorship of Ant. Their contracts are basically the same next year, but Bledsoe has $4 mil guaranteed in 2022-23 vs Ricky’s true expiring. So I guess I would leave put the Bledsoe/Ricky part, and see if they are moving on from Clarke, whether they’d want to take a chance on the younger Culver (and a 2nd).

Another thought that is if Ricky is going out, I wouldn’t mind Tyus Jones coming back in a deal.

It’s a smart trade with an interesting team, but these are bench moves. I’d ask to see if there is a chance for a value, because it wouldn’t break my heart ot walk away from this one either.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,948
And1: 3,631
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#771 » by BlacJacMac » Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:14 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=20

I'd make a run at Hield and Bagley if kings would take any combo of Rubio, Beasley, Huancho, and Culver. No picks given up.
Dlo
Edwards
McDaniels
Bagley
Towns

Use Hields as 6th man instant firepower off the bench.


Hield is just a 4 year older and much more expensive version of Beasley.

And I don't want to be the next team to pay Bagley.
User avatar
moonpie
General Manager
Posts: 9,017
And1: 2,692
Joined: Dec 14, 2010
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#772 » by moonpie » Wed Jul 28, 2021 12:30 am

Read on Twitter


Based on the feedback given, here's a revised deal expanding to 4 teams:

MIN in: Larry Nance Jr., Cedi Osman
MIN out: Jarrett Culver, Jake Layman

MEM in: Kyle Kuzma, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
MEM out: Eric Bledsoe, Brandon Clarke

CLE in: Jarrett Culver, Brandon Clarke
CLE out: Larry Nance Jr., Cedi Osman

LAL in: Eric Bledsoe, Jake Layman
LAL out: Kyle Kuzma, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope


MIN - Take on some extra salary and years, but give up relatively little of value in exchange for getting a perfect compliment to Towns at the 4 in Nance and a serviceable role player in Cedi.

MEM - Pick up some depth for someone who isn't in their future plans (Bledsoe) and someone who has fallen out of favor (Clarke).

CLE - Shed salary and pick up two projects in Culver and Clarke.

LAL - Rumored to be targeting Bledsoe (as well as shopping KCP/Kuzma around) so they pick him up in this deal. Layman's athleticism, slashing, and ability to hit the open 3 should pair well with AD/LeBron. The Lakers also save about $4M in this deal from a cap perspective.

Roster???

DLO/Ricky/JMac
Malik/Cedi/Nowell
Ant/Okogie/Bolmaro
Nance/Jaden/Juancho
KAT/Naz/Vando
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#773 » by Nick K » Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:27 am

shrink wrote:I like the concept, but not the value so much.

The Grizzlies are active, and after the last trade, Justine Winslow will be gone. They can’t be too high on Brandon Clarke right now, and he’s already 24. He could be useful here, but he’s not a good three point shooter and he’s only 6’ 8” with really short arms (6’ 8” wingspan). I don’t think we want him as our starting PF.

There is a difference in value between Rubio and Bledsoe too, even without Ricky’s mentorship of Ant. Their contracts are basically the same next year, but Bledsoe has $4 mil guaranteed in 2022-23 vs Ricky’s true expiring. So I guess I would leave put the Bledsoe/Ricky part, and see if they are moving on from Clarke, whether they’d want to take a chance on the younger Culver (and a 2nd).

Another thought that is if Ricky is going out, I wouldn’t mind Tyus Jones coming back in a deal.

It’s a smart trade with an interesting team, but these are bench moves. I’d ask to see if there is a chance for a value, because it wouldn’t break my heart ot walk away from this one either.


Right, right, right, and right.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,758
And1: 23,087
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#774 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:34 am

Read on Twitter


No surprise
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,784
And1: 2,394
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#775 » by Nick K » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:12 am

Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


No surprise


For most of last year I would have moved Ricky for a ham sandwich. Then the final 15 games he played as good as he could and was a great fit here. Shot the ball very well etc.

Later I read an interview where he said he was out of shape, very unhappy with the direction of the team under Ryan who he loved. He hated the covid protocols feeling no love from fans and didn't want to be here. Then Finch took over and everything changed.

I'd like to keep him one more year to run the 2nd group and fit in with the starters as needed. Ant loves him. And he's a great veteran presence. I hope they don't move him unless it's for a key starting PF.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,661
And1: 19,764
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#776 » by shrink » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:25 am

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Rubio get traded, but I’d be just fine if he was on the roster next year, as an investment in Ant.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 559
And1: 301
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#777 » by fattymcgee » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:42 am

For those of you wanting Bledsoe, he was garbage last year. He's supposed to be a good defensive player but didn't play defense last year either.
Pelican fans were desperate to get him off the team.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,749
And1: 1,970
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#778 » by jpatrick » Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:55 am

shrink wrote:I wouldn’t be surprised to see Rubio get traded, but I’d be just fine if he was on the roster next year, as an investment in Ant.


I was shocked we traded for him. Would have moved him for nothing most of the year. Then he gets in shape plays decent down the stretch and now is killing it in FIBA. Unless we get real value, I’d want to keep him. He’s an adult Ant listens too. Plus he allows up to play DLo off the ball some, which we’ll need to do if Beasley is moved.

I’m at the point, if either Rubio or Beasley have to be included in a trade, I’d rather it be Beasley.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,966
And1: 2,599
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#779 » by Slim Tubby » Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:32 am

Nick K wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


No surprise


For most of last year I would have moved Ricky for a ham sandwich. Then the final 15 games he played as good as he could and was a great fit here. Shot the ball very well etc.

Later I read an interview where he said he was out of shape, very unhappy with the direction of the team under Ryan who he loved. He hated the covid protocols feeling no love from fans and didn't want to be here. Then Finch took over and everything changed.

I'd like to keep him one more year to run the 2nd group and fit in with the starters as needed. Ant loves him. And he's a great veteran presence. I hope they don't move him unless it's for a key starting PF.

Another post that is spot on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,167
And1: 4,659
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Seven) 

Post#780 » by wolves_89 » Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:33 am

If Nance is on the market I'd put him at the top of the realistic trade options. His defense, rebounding, and 3pt shooting would be a great fit. If the Wolves could get him for some combination of expiring contracts (a couple of Juancho, Culver, and Layman) plus a protected pick I'd be ecstatic.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves