ImageImageImageImageImage

Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?)

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,466
And1: 1,220
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#221 » by Old_Blue » Fri Aug 6, 2021 10:50 pm

Johnny355 wrote:Warriors in:
Buddy Hield, Harrison Barnes

Sac in:

Wiggins, Damian Lee, Mark Mulder, 2022 FRP, 2026 FRP (lottery protected)

Wiggins is a better scorer and slasher than Barnes but provides better D at 4 with Drey at 5 and is a comparable shooter. Hield is a perfect 6th man scorer that can also be a secondary ball handler and lethal on court in certain match ups with klay and steph. Wiseman will be free on inside for sure.

Kings are not going anywhere this year and wiggs is young enough to still be part of their future along with the picks. As pure value, kings are getting more and get off of Hields contract with too many small combo guards on the team. This works contract/trade checker

Thoughts?


Sorry, but that idea stanks. A decent deal would have been Barnes and Delon Wright in exchange for Wiggins. But, then the Kings up and traded Wright to the Hawks. Oh well. :banghead:
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
ChuckDurn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,998
And1: 838
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#222 » by ChuckDurn » Fri Aug 6, 2021 11:06 pm

I don't take too much stock in the "Hornets signing RFA Markkanen, and 3-way trade rumor involving Golden State" reporting. But it is conceivable that Charlotte would prefer the combination of Oubre and Markkanen's salary over Hayward (and they don't have enough straight-up to take both Oubre and Markkanen in). I wouldn't want that, but since Oubre and Markkanen play the 3 and the 4 respectively, which overlap with Hayward (and his injury history)..... so maybe Charlotte does.

And if so, a 3-way deal could be started with the following big pieces:

Warriors out: Wiggins
Warriors in: Hayward

Charlotte out: Hayward
Charlotte in: Oubre (free agent), Markkanen (sign & trade).
Note that Oubre signing as a free agent isn't actually part of the trade, it precedes it, and consumes Charlotte's cap space.

Bulls out: Markkanen (sign & trade)
Bulls in: Wiggins

I'm pretty sure the Bulls would need to send additional salary out as well for matching purposes (Coby White?), obviously depending on how much Markkanen signs for.

It's not a deal that I would do if I was either Charlotte or Chicago, but there is a way to construct a 3-team deal if they get super-creative.
If I don't have anything funny to say, can I still have a signature?
ChuckDurn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,998
And1: 838
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#223 » by ChuckDurn » Fri Aug 6, 2021 11:08 pm

Scoots1994 wrote:
Johnny355 wrote:Warriors in:
Buddy Hield, Harrison Barnes

Sac in:

Wiggins, Damian Lee, Mark Mulder, 2022 FRP, 2026 FRP (lottery protected)

Wiggins is a better scorer and slasher than Barnes but provides better D at 4 with Drey at 5 and is a comparable shooter. Hield is a perfect 6th man scorer that can also be a secondary ball handler and lethal on court in certain match ups with klay and steph. Wiseman will be free on inside for sure.

Kings are not going anywhere this year and wiggs is young enough to still be part of their future along with the picks. As pure value, kings are getting more and get off of Hields contract with too many small combo guards on the team. This works contract/trade checker

Thoughts?


No thanks.

Barnes plays the very deep 4 on the Warriors, Hield is too small to play the thinner 3 position on the Warriors. Lee shot better from 3 than Hield. AND 2 first round picks?

No.

This.

The various constructions of any "Wiggins + x for Barnes + y" always fail in the designation of Barnes as a replacement for Wiggins. As you note, they play different positions and have different roles on the Warriors, and that reduces any benefit to the Warriors.
If I don't have anything funny to say, can I still have a signature?
Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,466
And1: 1,220
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#224 » by Old_Blue » Fri Aug 6, 2021 11:42 pm

ChuckDurn wrote:I don't take too much stock in the "Hornets signing RFA Markkanen, and 3-way trade rumor involving Golden State" reporting. But it is conceivable that Charlotte would prefer the combination of Oubre and Markkanen's salary over Hayward (and they don't have enough straight-up to take both Oubre and Markkanen in). I wouldn't want that, but since Oubre and Markkanen play the 3 and the 4 respectively, which overlap with Hayward (and his injury history)..... so maybe Charlotte does.

And if so, a 3-way deal could be started with the following big pieces:

Warriors out: Wiggins
Warriors in: Hayward

Charlotte out: Hayward
Charlotte in: Oubre (free agent), Markkanen (sign & trade).
Note that Oubre signing as a free agent isn't actually part of the trade, it precedes it, and consumes Charlotte's cap space.

Bulls out: Markkanen (sign & trade)
Bulls in: Wiggins

I'm pretty sure the Bulls would need to send additional salary out as well for matching purposes (Coby White?), obviously depending on how much Markkanen signs for.

It's not a deal that I would do if I was either Charlotte or Chicago, but there is a way to construct a 3-team deal if they get super-creative.


Wiggins for Hayward doesn't move the needle much, if at all. The injury history with Hayward is also worrisome.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
ChuckDurn
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,998
And1: 838
Joined: May 13, 2011

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#225 » by ChuckDurn » Fri Aug 6, 2021 11:48 pm

Old_Blue wrote:
ChuckDurn wrote:I don't take too much stock in the "Hornets signing RFA Markkanen, and 3-way trade rumor involving Golden State" reporting. But it is conceivable that Charlotte would prefer the combination of Oubre and Markkanen's salary over Hayward (and they don't have enough straight-up to take both Oubre and Markkanen in). I wouldn't want that, but since Oubre and Markkanen play the 3 and the 4 respectively, which overlap with Hayward (and his injury history)..... so maybe Charlotte does.

And if so, a 3-way deal could be started with the following big pieces:

Warriors out: Wiggins
Warriors in: Hayward

Charlotte out: Hayward
Charlotte in: Oubre (free agent), Markkanen (sign & trade).
Note that Oubre signing as a free agent isn't actually part of the trade, it precedes it, and consumes Charlotte's cap space.

Bulls out: Markkanen (sign & trade)
Bulls in: Wiggins

I'm pretty sure the Bulls would need to send additional salary out as well for matching purposes (Coby White?), obviously depending on how much Markkanen signs for.

It's not a deal that I would do if I was either Charlotte or Chicago, but there is a way to construct a 3-team deal if they get super-creative.


Wiggins for Hayward doesn't move the needle much, if at all. The injury history with Hayward is also worrisome.

Hayward is, in a vacuum, a much better player than Wiggins. But the injury risk obviously is a consideration. Plus, Wiggins' role in guarding the opponents' best wings is something that Hayward would struggle with. Despite that, I'd consider it, and I suspect the front office would as well, as Hayward is definitely perceived to be more of a "star" than Wiggins.....
If I don't have anything funny to say, can I still have a signature?
Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,466
And1: 1,220
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#226 » by Old_Blue » Sat Aug 7, 2021 12:07 am

ChuckDurn wrote:Hayward is, in a vacuum, a much better player than Wiggins. But the injury risk obviously is a consideration. Plus, Wiggins' role in guarding the opponents' best wings is something that Hayward would struggle with. Despite that, I'd consider it, and I suspect the front office would as well, as Hayward is definitely perceived to be more of a "star" than Wiggins.....


The thing about Hayward is that he's a better shooter (40% from three/85% from the line over the last two years). He might also be easier to move in a future trade, despite having about $90 million left on his deal (compared to about $65 million left for Wiggins). Between Hayward, Klay, OPJ and Iggy though, we'd definitely have to introduce a load management strategy.
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
Commodor
Analyst
Posts: 3,201
And1: 959
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
     

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#227 » by Commodor » Sat Aug 7, 2021 5:13 am

No thanks to an extra year of Hayward. He’s already a serious injury risk. Ticky tack 2-3 month lingering injuries. The worst kind. It won’t get better and we’ll be stuck playing rookies and back ups.

Wiggins easily at this point. Youth, consistency, defense, and a year less of contract.

Unless CHA wants to sweeten the deal this is an easy no. Not nearly enough upside for the risk. We saw Batum go through this same process in CHA just 2-3 years ago. Injuries suck.

I’ll catch Hayward on the minimum contract flip side.
michaelwarner
Junior
Posts: 262
And1: 42
Joined: Aug 27, 2014
     

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#228 » by michaelwarner » Sat Aug 7, 2021 4:54 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21

It’s official. No 3 way deal with Cha.
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 21,055
And1: 8,789
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#229 » by cpower » Sat Aug 7, 2021 5:29 pm

ChuckDurn wrote:
Scoots1994 wrote:
Johnny355 wrote:Warriors in:
Buddy Hield, Harrison Barnes

Sac in:

Wiggins, Damian Lee, Mark Mulder, 2022 FRP, 2026 FRP (lottery protected)

Wiggins is a better scorer and slasher than Barnes but provides better D at 4 with Drey at 5 and is a comparable shooter. Hield is a perfect 6th man scorer that can also be a secondary ball handler and lethal on court in certain match ups with klay and steph. Wiseman will be free on inside for sure.

Kings are not going anywhere this year and wiggs is young enough to still be part of their future along with the picks. As pure value, kings are getting more and get off of Hields contract with too many small combo guards on the team. This works contract/trade checker

Thoughts?


No thanks.

Barnes plays the very deep 4 on the Warriors, Hield is too small to play the thinner 3 position on the Warriors. Lee shot better from 3 than Hield. AND 2 first round picks?

No.

This.

The various constructions of any "Wiggins + x for Barnes + y" always fail in the designation of Barnes as a replacement for Wiggins. As you note, they play different positions and have different roles on the Warriors, and that reduces any benefit to the Warriors.

thats a good deal for us and i dont think Kings would go with it. Wiggins/Barnes/Hield are all role playe. maybe Wiggins is 5% better than Barnes but it does not matter much in grand scheme of things. if Klay is healthy Barnes can be 3 or 4 based on our needs. it works in 2015 and it would work today.
michaelwarner
Junior
Posts: 262
And1: 42
Joined: Aug 27, 2014
     

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#230 » by michaelwarner » Sat Aug 7, 2021 6:14 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,910
And1: 7,975
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#231 » by xdrta+ » Sat Aug 7, 2021 8:15 pm

michaelwarner wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21


"...the league is expected to look into any contact that may have occurred prior to the opening of the free agency negotiating period on Monday at 5:00pm CT. Both agreements were reported within minutes after the negotiating period began."

What is wrong with these people? Everyone knows that there are talks before the negotiating period begins, but to announce it within minutes of the opening? That's just dumb. S&Ts especially, since they are more complex and take time to settle. Idiots.
Brick Layer
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 01, 2021

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#232 » by Brick Layer » Sat Aug 7, 2021 8:58 pm

xdrta+ wrote:
michaelwarner wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21


"...the league is expected to look into any contact that may have occurred prior to the opening of the free agency negotiating period on Monday at 5:00pm CT. Both agreements were reported within minutes after the negotiating period began."

What is wrong with these people? Everyone knows that there are talks before the negotiating period begins, but to announce it within minutes of the opening? That's just dumb. S&Ts especially, since they are more complex and take time to settle. Idiots.

I hope the league office penalizes these teams by stripping multiple first round draft picks from every team involved.
DIO
Pro Prospect
Posts: 806
And1: 183
Joined: Dec 03, 2007

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#233 » by DIO » Mon Aug 9, 2021 4:04 pm

Read on Twitter

:-?
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,513
And1: 3,854
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#234 » by azwfan » Mon Aug 9, 2021 4:16 pm

DIO wrote:
Read on Twitter

:-?

This is Toronto trying to get more than Davion Mitchell out of Sacramento.

At least I hope so. :pray:
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#235 » by FNQ » Mon Aug 9, 2021 7:18 pm

azwfan wrote:
DIO wrote:
Read on Twitter

:-?

This is Toronto trying to get more than Davion Mitchell out of Sacramento.

At least I hope so. :pray:


If we were interested in Siakam it would have been pre-draft.. Toronto is more interested now that we’ve made our picks and signed them? Lol nah.. unless the cost is mostly Wiggins, our involvement seems pretty unlikely
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,410
And1: 15,551
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#236 » by whatisacenter » Mon Aug 9, 2021 7:37 pm

incoming Raps fans in 3..2..1
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#237 » by GSWFan1994 » Mon Aug 9, 2021 8:35 pm

It doesn't make sense. Just clickbait crap.
Brick Layer
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 01, 2021

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#238 » by Brick Layer » Mon Aug 9, 2021 8:37 pm

whatisacenter wrote:incoming Raps fans in 3..2..1

Direct from the Raptors board:
10giz wrote:How about:

TOR trades: Siakam + Dragic + Boucher

GSW trades: Wiggins + Wiseman + Kuminga + Moody + 2023 1st

Dragic would actually be pretty nice there.
Mob Byers
Rookie
Posts: 1,052
And1: 767
Joined: Apr 22, 2021

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#239 » by Mob Byers » Mon Aug 9, 2021 8:56 pm

Brick Layer wrote:
whatisacenter wrote:incoming Raps fans in 3..2..1

Direct from the Raptors board:
10giz wrote:How about:

TOR trades: Siakam + Dragic + Boucher

GSW trades: Wiggins + Wiseman + Kuminga + Moody + 2023 1st

Dragic would actually be pretty nice there.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
xdrta+
RealGM
Posts: 10,910
And1: 7,975
Joined: Jun 18, 2018
 

Re: Trade Thread (EPISODE VII: Which team wants our bad players for their good players?) 

Post#240 » by xdrta+ » Mon Aug 9, 2021 9:45 pm

Yeah, because the Warriors want to pay $18 million to a backup pg.

Return to Golden State Warriors