HumbleRen wrote:Rewatched the game and these are my take aways
Negatives
- Lack of burst in the half court.
- very limited lateral quickness, (shouldn’t guard PG’s in the actual NBA)
- Pretty raw offensive game, high handles so he won’t be a primary playmaker any time soon in the NBA
Positives
- Great feel for the game
- Can impact the game without having a great shooting performance
- Elite in transition
- An amazing connector, will thrive as the 2nd playmaker
- Willingness to shoot and not settle
- Can anchor a defence with his leadership and constant chattering
- Superstar intangibles
I think it is a fair assessment and consistent with scouting observations. I don't think we thought of Barnes as an immediate starter, but he is already a high floor role player with all-star upside.
One draft writer I really like, Max Feldman has a model that looks at different prospect types: Swing, Hybrid, and Stability. He classed Toronto as ideal for a Hybrid prospect which Barnes happens to be:
At maximum, 10 prospects of the 50 listed are classified as a hybrid , where they bring forward a safe floor that can translate quickly, but their youth and tools provide strong upside.
Teams opting for a HYBRID selection may fall in the following categories.
Teams in a gloomy area – not necessarily competing but their high level players are near or in their peak, making it difficult to enter a rebuild.
https://frontofficegurus.com/the-fog-aggregate-model/That situation describes Toronto well and Barnes fits because at worst he defends well, moves the ball as a connective wing/forward, and crashes the glass. That can all work in year one and he is such a team guy I don't think it is a worry about underutilizing him.