skones wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:skones wrote:
PJ Tucker was a much better player at 27 than Thanasis is now AND he's an outlier. It's baffling that you'd sit there and think that that's an applicable developmental path.
PJ wasn't good yet at 27, so it's a real hyperbole to say he was much better than anyone.
Both players are similar height, strength, quickness, effort level. Thanasis fouls too much, and is too undisciplined in his whole game.
Ojeleye is a the more positive comparison.
No, it's not real hyperbole. Tucker was a highly productive player overseas prior to his second turn in the NBA. Like I said, your trying to pigeonhole this as an applicable developmental route is baffling. It reeks of homerism. You don't just put an athlete on the floor and get PJ Tucker. Basketball brains matter.
Any other player in the NBA, at 29 years old, and we'd be sitting there saying, he is what he is. We wouldn't be talking about his developmental track, because it defies logic.
Look at Tuckers numbers! Are you really saying he was the same player at 27 as he was for the next 7 seasons?
I get it, you mad Thanasis is back, but calm down. Development attempts never stop. Will it take?
Probably not, but there's plenty of examples of players changing their game into their 30s. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.
This isn't an important stance for me, though, so carry on.
























