ATLTimekeeper wrote:sidsid wrote:I think it does matter if OG is guarding Durant instead of FVV, and Durant would agree with me, along with every coach in the league. And if it didn't matter, you could put 5 FVVs on the floor - I mean, there's no difference defensively and everyone is unstoppable and there are no downsides at all to doing that - and start winning some 'chips.
No, that's not what I mean. You've reduced defense to individual match-ups, when we both know that Kevin Durant can't get the FVV match-up every time he wants. If it's individualized, still Durant is scoring on Simmons, prime Rodman, Pippen, you name it. It's not, though, and that's why FVV is still really valuable defensively. That's what those stats are useful for, and why you have no examples of FVV getting picked on defensively in the playoffs. They put him on Curry in the Finals. They tried Kawhi and he got destroyed in under a quarter and had to be moved off.
I
t's true that not every playoff team can exploit your liabilities, but most can, and that's why these types of players are vulnerable to matchups. It explains Fred's futility against big playoff defenses, for example (even if our 'chip run didn't include a Superstar shooting wing targetting Fred on the offensive end).
Klay wasn't a superstar shooting wing. Middleton not enough of a shooting wing? Was Jimmy Butler hunting down Fred?
If you want to make an argument against trading Ben for Fred, it's banking on Ben not improving offensively at all for the rest of his career (a very real possibility imo), and tanking his trade value in other ways. Not by pretending that being talented, tall and athletic doesn't matter in the NBA.
The argument is that Fred has more utility than Ben on any team, including a champ. You have to have wiped your memory clear of certain events to deny this. The primary case is that the Raptors couldn't afford to trade 9 3PAs for 0. The secondary case has been proven that Fred's defensive aptitude is highly underrated. Ben is a great defender, but being a great big defender on a team full of great big defenders... well, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson comes cheap.
It’s not just about getting isolated on and beat. Teams can cover for that even if it’s not ideal. Send the double to help when Fred is backed down by a bigger player. Or send the double when the Durant type wing puts the ball on the floor.
The real issue is perimeter close outs. When the scrambles and rotations occur it all to often ends with Fred running out (or Kyle in the past too) and a wing 6’6” or taller shooting like it’s an open shot even when the six footer is “close”.
Swap that close out from 6’ to 6’10” and that shot doesn’t even get attempted and more likely than not turns into a much worse late clock shot with a considerably worse percentage and PPP outcome.
Athletic, switchable length has tremendous value to team defence.
I make the Fred and parts for Simmons trade without a second thought.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk