GM89 wrote:Think raps will be somewhere between 6-8th seed this year.
I only see 5 teams definitely being 100% better than us: Nets, Bucks, Miami, 76ers and Boston.
Bulls, Pacers, and Knicks don't scare me.
Hawks are better than us too imo.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
GM89 wrote:Think raps will be somewhere between 6-8th seed this year.
I only see 5 teams definitely being 100% better than us: Nets, Bucks, Miami, 76ers and Boston.
Bulls, Pacers, and Knicks don't scare me.
Steelo Green wrote:vulture wrote:Steelo Green wrote:The Celtics have a superstar caliber player. Their two best are better than anyone on our team. Think they’re more of a build issue than talent one.
Knicks I would agree with but they do have Barrett who could very well make a huge leap. His talent is more than anyone on the team.
Bulls stink yes though they are better. Dunno if it’s that much better but in the hunt for sure.
Pacers are in our category but I think more talent than us. Sabonis, Brogdon, Levert, Turner, Warren (if healthy), is a team that probably has more talent than us.
Hornets are a young team with a budding star in Lamelo.
We were also fourth with Kyle and Norm which for some reason has been valued very little.
Another pick would do this team well but again it will come to fruition this season when no TB excuses exist.
this is super negative, but I'm not surprised it's coming from you. come one man RJ Barrett is not better than Siakam, OG or Fred.
I do hope we get another lottery pick, but this team is too well coached and organized to tank again.
I didn’t say he’s better - I said they have a player capable of taking a leap who has the talent to surpass everyone on the team.
His age and talent level is scary considering he’s already shooting 40% from distance. I did also say we’re probably in their realm which is a team not going to do anything.
No matter how good coaching you have, if you’re not good, you’re not good.
RGM doing a top 25 players post on the main page and Siakam and Fred not in the picture. Raptors are somehow some up and coming team without a top 30 player?
Duffman100 wrote:Dalek wrote:We lost Kawhi, Gasol, Green, Ibaka, Powell and Lowry for a grand total of Gary Trent Jr. and Precious Achuiwa. I guess we haven't lost any picks, but we haven't gained any significant ones either.
Comments like these drive me crazy.
First off, we won a title because of those players. So it's Gary Trent, Achuiwa and a TITLE.
Secondly,
Kawhi got us that title. Getting anything for him would have meant not winning.
Danny Green was pretty toast near the end of the playoffs. And we had OG and Norm to fill his role for the next year. Didn't lose out on much.
We were still contenders the next year and Gasol and Ibaka were big reasons for it. Trading them wouldn't have made sense.
Taking a shot on Giannis turned out bad, but would we want Ibaka now? With his surgery?
So Norm and Lowry for Trent and Achuiwa. Trent is 5 years younger than Norm, so ... good. I would have loved more for Lowry, but it clearly wasn't in the cards. He's criminally underrated and was making 30 million and asking for 20-30 million extension. Made it hard to deal him.
JShuttlesworth wrote:Hawks are better than us too imo.
Absolutely factual. It has nothing to do with tanking. Or trying to be bad.aminiaturebuddha wrote:I'm just curious - how many people commenting on here actually listened to the CBC podcast where Masai made this comment?
It seems as though people are making a lot of inferences about what he might have meant from this one quote, but much of that is stuff that didn't come through for me at all based upon the full context of the conversation.
I personally already am in the first group. Im not expecting the team to be great, but they might be a little better than expected. Anything from 35-45 wouldn't surprise me. I wouldn't mind a pivot to "tanking" post all star break if the team just doesn't have it. Thats a logical move , same way it was last year.lobosloboslobos wrote:My humble suggestion is that:
those posters who are optimistic that this team can make the playoffs will revise their thinking and be happy to angle for the lottery if midway through the season it becomes apparent that this team is really not as good as they thought and that the young guys need another year to be ready to make that leap
and
those posters who believe this team has little to no chance to make the playoffs and who are convinced that tanking is the best approach to this season will revise their thinking and be happy to be doing well should the team actually prove to be better than they thought and our young guys take big steps towards success
any chance y'all can do that instead of us having a damn war all season? let's see what happens and hope for the best, whether it is a high lottery pick or a playoff spot.
Again. Not the topic. And thats probably not "literally " what he said. Ive seen the post.Steelo Green wrote:canada_dry wrote:Thats y'all issue about his thread and mischaracterizing it like u do a lot of things. Thats between u guys. What he put on this thread here did a fine job of illustrating where the other side falls. Ur guy changed the topic to try n discredit him as if he doesn't have any say about the anti tank perspective...but again he did a fine job of telling u what it was.Steelo Green wrote:By ignoring Duncan, Wade, Lebron…
So lets go from there rather than changing the topic and trying to poo poo his "right" to talk from the other side, eh?
Its ur boy that absolutely mischaracterized the anti tank viewpoint, as he usually does, while also exposing himself in the process as a day 1 tanker for this coming season.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
No he literally was untruthful.
The irony of mischaracterization when that’s exactly what you’re doing.
He said no player with the top pick one a title in the last twenty years with the team that drafted him. They did. Duncan - 5 times. Lebron - 1. We even said let’s ignore Lebron’s return. The 0 times is just a blatant lie.
Being drafted in the late 90s means any titles in the early 2000s are ignored - for what? Narrative?
It’s become this constant ignore facts and then say the other person is wrong as an argument even when it’s black and white proven false I guess.
pingpongrac wrote:
GTJ doesn't need to "massively improve." He averaged 13 PPG on 60 TS% as the 3rd/4th option in the second half of the 19/20 season and he averaged 15 PPG on 55 TS% as the clear #3 option with Portland last season. For a 21-22 year-old, those are very good numbers and they can be easily replicated as the 3rd/4th option (depending on how OG progresses) this coming season.
pingpongrac wrote:For all of the talk that Lillard and McCollum (who combined to average 51.9 PPG on 38.7 FGA while combining for 12.2 AST) created all of GTJ's offence, 32% of his FGM were unassisted in Portland. For comparison, 34% of Powell's FGM were unassisted in Portland. Also, Siakam and FVV -- while clearly not at the same level as Lillard especially -- are more than capable of being the main creators. They combined for 10.8 AST while only committing 4.1 TOV last season and that was while sharing duties with Lowry (who averaged 7.2 AST) as the main playmakers.
GTJ only played 8 games with FVV and 4 games with Lowry (3 games where they both played), which means Flynn+Bembry+Stanley were the secondary playmakers behind Siakam in most of the other ~10 games that GTJ played for us. It's no wonder his numbers didn't look very good. This year will be very different without a tanking lineup in most of his games.
U also blatantly said u hope the team "tanks better" this year. I.e they tank earlier in the year. Maybe from the start.720 wrote:vulture wrote:720 wrote:This is hilarious. Like I get it, maybe they don't suck too much and they end up winning 40 games and get a low seed like you are suggesting. But to just assume after losing Lowry and going young it's some how guaranteed that we'll make the playoffs is wrong imo.
I didn't say it's guaranteed that they will be in the playoffs and I've maintained that this is a play-in team, but we ain't never bottoming out like some people want.
Most of us here are saying the team isn't good enough to go over the 37 win total o/u it's not about bottoming out or trading everyone. Talent will dictated the direction of this team.
It's hard to predict which is why people on both sides are making half measure predictions like 'I think they'll win 45+ or be really bad', no one wants to go out on a limb. We'll get a better idea a month into the season.
JShuttlesworth wrote:GM89 wrote:Think raps will be somewhere between 6-8th seed this year.
I only see 5 teams definitely being 100% better than us: Nets, Bucks, Miami, 76ers and Boston.
Bulls, Pacers, and Knicks don't scare me.
Hawks are better than us too imo.

Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
canada_dry wrote:U also blatantly said u hope the team "tanks better" this year. I.e they tank earlier in the year. Maybe from the start.720 wrote:vulture wrote:
I didn't say it's guaranteed that they will be in the playoffs and I've maintained that this is a play-in team, but we ain't never bottoming out like some people want.
Most of us here are saying the team isn't good enough to go over the 37 win total o/u it's not about bottoming out or trading everyone. Talent will dictated the direction of this team.
It's hard to predict which is why people on both sides are making half measure predictions like 'I think they'll win 45+ or be really bad', no one wants to go out on a limb. We'll get a better idea a month into the season.
So basically what hes saying the team wont do(trying to be bad to start the season) is something you're clamoring for. Which for some reason u denied wanting when in the same thread u said u were hoping for. Ur kinda all over the place my guy.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app


OhCanada1091 wrote:Cool but I'd much rather we tank next year. That draft is stacked.



720 wrote:canada_dry wrote:U also blatantly said u hope the team "tanks better" this year. I.e they tank earlier in the year. Maybe from the start.720 wrote:Most of us here are saying the team isn't good enough to go over the 37 win total o/u it's not about bottoming out or trading everyone. Talent will dictated the direction of this team.
It's hard to predict which is why people on both sides are making half measure predictions like 'I think they'll win 45+ or be really bad', no one wants to go out on a limb. We'll get a better idea a month into the season.
So basically what hes saying the team wont do(trying to be bad to start the season) is something you're clamoring for. Which for some reason u denied wanting when in the same thread u said u were hoping for. Ur kinda all over the place my guy.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
You're a clown lol , I was referring to when he kept bringing back Fred, Trent, and Siakam in random games at the end of the season, completely benched our tank commander in Baynes and brought help for that position. Basically implied that this time if things go south he lets it go south completely. Also on the post you are referring to I said I ain't complaining because we got lucky and ended up with the 4th pick. Now **** off weirdo.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
Steelo Green wrote:canada_dry wrote:Well he illustrated it pretty damn well. So...720 wrote:You don’t even post enough to represent treadmill nation I don’t even think of you when I mention them. But aren’t you the guy that said a top 5 pick has never won a championship for the team that they were drafted in?Just stop bro I’m ignoring you.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
By ignoring Duncan, Wade, Lebron…
Reeko wrote:720 wrote:canada_dry wrote:U also blatantly said u hope the team "tanks better" this year. I.e they tank earlier in the year. Maybe from the start.
So basically what hes saying the team wont do(trying to be bad to start the season) is something you're clamoring for. Which for some reason u denied wanting when in the same thread u said u were hoping for. Ur kinda all over the place my guy.
Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
You're a clown lol , I was referring to when he kept bringing back Fred, Trent, and Siakam in random games at the end of the season, completely benched our tank commander in Baynes and brought help for that position. Basically implied that this time if things go south he lets it go south completely. Also on the post you are referring to I said I ain't complaining because we got lucky and ended up with the 4th pick. Now **** off weirdo.
C'mon man. You're smart enough to make your point without that last sentence. Consider this an unofficial warning.


CANsportsguru wrote:Yeah there's no question we're lottery bound. However the question is do we trade Pascal at some point at try to get a top 5 pick (and whatever assets he lands us) or do we think having Pascal and 10-15 pick is a better option. This team currently is 38-42 win team (depending on how many games Pascal misses at the start of the season). Masai has said in the past that he doesn't want to be in "no man's land" which is where this team would be if we finished just around .500
GM89 wrote:JShuttlesworth wrote:Hawks are better than us too imo.
Maybe, I watched them in the playoffs and they basically needed 35+ a night from Trae just to have a chance. Nurse is great at devising defensive schemes for these one man show type of teams.
They shouldn't have gotten passed Philly but their epic meltdown is a whole other topic.