ImageImage

Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,316
And1: 7,420
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#421 » by FAH1223 » Sun Oct 10, 2021 9:49 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Crazy games in Cincinnati indeed

Crazy games in Cincinnati indeed


Lol @ Rodgers brought up the 2005 Packers-Bengals game in the post game presser
Image
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,691
And1: 56,856
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#422 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Oct 10, 2021 10:03 pm

Read on Twitter
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
vital_signs
Analyst
Posts: 3,368
And1: 2,239
Joined: Feb 12, 2015
 

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#423 » by vital_signs » Sun Oct 10, 2021 11:06 pm

Up until the last play
Inadequate perception I reckon it's from the Valium
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,022
And1: 5,075
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#424 » by RRyder823 » Sun Oct 10, 2021 11:45 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:
ReginaldDwight wrote:
MickeyDavis wrote:Gute got blasted for "caving" to Rodgers and bringing back Cobb

Lets be real cobb hasnt looked this good in years. Hope he stays healthy

It was a 6th round pick. Low risk, high reward. And the reward has been high
The man had 2 catches today and really has only made a significant impact in one game this year.

Meanwhile the reason why the Packers weren't able to bring in Gilmore was due to not being able to absorb his salary so im not sure why anyone would be quick to take a victory lap on bringing Cobb back

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,691
And1: 56,856
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#425 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Oct 10, 2021 11:54 pm

Cobb made a great 16 yard catch on 3rd down that led to the game winner. Last week 2 big TD's. I'd say he has played a major role in 2 of the 4 victories. Sure he could get hurt. But MVS is hurt right now, Lazard has done nothing, ESB is a scrub and Amari a rook. And Davante has missed games each of the last 4 seasons. There's no guarantee Gilmore would be here. And no guarantee he'll be productive this season ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,022
And1: 5,075
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#426 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 11, 2021 12:08 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Cobb made a great 16 yard catch on 3rd down that led to the game winner. Last week 2 big TD's. I'd say he has played a major role in 2 of the 4 victories. Sure he could get hurt. But MVS is hurt right now, Lazard has done nothing, ESB is a scrub and Amari a rook. There's no guarantee Gilmore would be here. And no guarantee he'll be productive this season ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yes that 16 yarder that he wasn't exactly running free but has Rodgers looking for him as a saftey blanket because he's familiar with him. (sure you can argue that Rodgers trust is worth the price of admission production be damned but since most that would make that argument also would be the same ones to say Rodgers would build trust with insert "#4-5 wr here" over the years im going to ignore it)

While no guarantee most reports point to not being able to absorb Gilmores salary as the reason the Packers didn't trade for him. Can I say that with 100% certainty? No. But I can say with confidence it's a hell of a lot more likely to of happened had Cobb not been acquired.

Cobb had a big game against Pittsburgh. He was really good last week. Much respect to his play a week ago. This week he was a complete non factor outside of a single play and just like I won't judge a CB poorly that locks his man down all day but gives up one play at the end im not going to give a pass to a WR that can't get open on consistent basis but makes a single play at the end

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,378
And1: 42,587
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#427 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Oct 11, 2021 12:23 am

Read on Twitter


I wish he was a young dude entering his prime instead of a guy who's likely to get overpaid in the offseason.
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 19,179
And1: 8,891
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#428 » by LikeABosh » Mon Oct 11, 2021 1:52 am

Campbell has been really good. Probably the best ILB we've had since.....????? Desmond Bishop in 2010?
chonestown
General Manager
Posts: 9,563
And1: 13,403
Joined: Mar 13, 2010

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#429 » by chonestown » Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:01 am

sdn40 wrote:
Ayt wrote:Adams is on pace for 134 receptions and 1853 yards. :lol:


And that's not a good thing


Agreed. More effective around 60-65 catches and 800 yards.imo
CWoodfan
Junior
Posts: 378
And1: 329
Joined: Aug 30, 2017
 

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#430 » by CWoodfan » Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:27 am

LikeABosh wrote:Campbell has been really good. Probably the best ILB we've had since.....????? Desmond Bishop in 2010?


Could not agree more.

Campbell 2021 brings back memories of Bishop 2010 - that last time I enjoyed an inside linebacker play for the Packers.

And, I doubted that Campbell was going to be any better than the many other scrubs we've trotted out there the last several years.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,022
And1: 5,075
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#431 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:35 am

LikeABosh wrote:Campbell has been really good. Probably the best ILB we've had since.....????? Desmond Bishop in 2010?
Yeah he's been pretty solid. Honestly better then Bishop. Hopefully J Smith can help keep Summers and Burks off the field

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,061
And1: 5,451
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#432 » by JimmyTheKid » Mon Oct 11, 2021 1:38 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Gute got blasted for "caving" to Rodgers and bringing back Cobb


:D

I also wanted nothing to do with bringing Cobb back and he's already made a number of of enormous plays through five weeks. The lesson here? Rodgers is usually right.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 104,691
And1: 56,856
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#433 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:24 pm

Well I don't know about that :) Kumerow has been active but has zero catches for Buffalo this season
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,523
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#434 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:32 pm

St. Brown with maybe the most pathetic block attempt in history on the bubble screen where lazard gets lit up.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,523
And1: 9,849
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#435 » by M-C-G » Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:38 pm

LedZepp007 wrote:
rilamann wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
Read on Twitter

They need to check him for a concussion while he's there. I find it hard to believe he didn't get concussed with how hard his head banged against the turf when he tried to run for that 1st down..

He got totally **** up. He looked to be out cold for a few seconds. I think there’s a small chance he threw straight to our guy in OT because he was confused


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Just rewatched it, I think they were looking at his neck, wonder if that was maybe the throat contusion? I also think he was scared **** that his legs were taken out that violently and that he was taking some time to figure out if all his legs were still in working order, definitely had a bit of a limp coming out of the blue tent.
Treebeard
General Manager
Posts: 7,880
And1: 1,973
Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Location: Out in the Driftless Area
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#436 » by Treebeard » Mon Oct 11, 2021 2:53 pm

M-C-G wrote:St. Brown with maybe the most pathetic block attempt in history on the bubble screen where lazard gets lit up.


Didn't he have more than one blocking whiff?
*******************************************************
User avatar
JimmyTheKid
General Manager
Posts: 9,061
And1: 5,451
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#437 » by JimmyTheKid » Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:04 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Well I don't know about that :) Kumerow has been active but has zero catches for Buffalo this season


True. But when we're talking about the last WR on the depth chart, as was the case with Kumerow vs. Malik Taylor, I'll always advocate for the guy the QB is most comfortable with. Unless, of course, that QB is someone other than a multi-MVP, first ballot HOF'er with a ring.
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,836
And1: 1,304
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#438 » by raysbookclub » Mon Oct 11, 2021 3:07 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
Read on Twitter


I wish he was a young dude entering his prime instead of a guy who's likely to get overpaid in the offseason.


Read on Twitter


Campbell has been so good. Along with the INT at the end of this game, he also had a first play TFL on the next Bengals drive. And he forced the final Bengals missed FG, stopping their RB cold in front of the marker on 3rd down. He was doing it all especially in crunch time.
leroyjw10
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,910
And1: 1,270
Joined: Oct 27, 2016
     

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#439 » by leroyjw10 » Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:00 pm

Treebeard wrote:
M-C-G wrote:St. Brown with maybe the most pathetic block attempt in history on the bubble screen where lazard gets lit up.


Didn't he have more than one blocking whiff?


I believe Lazard was the one who whiffed on the Jones swing pass. Either way, pretty poor execution on those plays today.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Game 5: Packers at Bengals - Noon - Fox 

Post#440 » by thomchatt3rton » Mon Oct 11, 2021 4:01 pm

Treebeard wrote:
M-C-G wrote:St. Brown with maybe the most pathetic block attempt in history on the bubble screen where lazard gets lit up.


Didn't he have more than one blocking whiff?

Idk if this is what you’re thinking of, but we ran that same screen earlier to a different WR with Lazard blocking and CIN blew that one up too.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Return to Green Bay Packers