FlyingArrow wrote:Negrodamus wrote:mithrandir17 wrote:What if the terms of Ben showing up is that he will only play in games where Embiid is out due to load management or injury, will that somehow increase his trade value? With this, teams who are willing to trade for him can look at some games where Ben is the focal point of the team. Surround Ben with Tobias, Green, Curry and Milton and you have multiple games where it is just Ben and four shooters.
With this kind of setup, Ben will still be paid but not play all games.
This goes back to the "leverage" discussion. What if Morey just says "no" and continues to not pay him and waits for a better trade to come along? I don't see the merit (for the FO) of using unmotivated Ben for 30 games to pay him 82.
Not pay him if he shows up for work? There's a contract. Just like Ben can't get paid for not working, the Sixers can't just choose not to pay him if he does show up for work. They don't have to play him, of course, but not paying him? That's a lawsuit they'd lose easily.
The initial post suggests terms of Ben only showing up and playing when Embiid is sitting. There's no reason for the Sixers to agree with those terms. So Ben would have to either play every game, like his contract states, or hold out.























