F N 11 wrote:Somebody in the game thread said RJ just need an opportunity as if he’s James Harden on OKC.
he's more like the thabo sefolosha on okc
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
F N 11 wrote:Somebody in the game thread said RJ just need an opportunity as if he’s James Harden on OKC.
evevale wrote:robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
hotter take than that: i doubt anybody wants him
hottest take: his next contract is vet min with the MavKnicks
BBALLER4FR wrote:LOL! SPike gave his seats to Cole's mom. GET THAT MAN OUT OF THE GARDEN ALREADY!!!!!
BBALLER4FR wrote:LOL! SPike gave his seats to Cole's mom. GET THAT MAN OUT OF THE GARDEN ALREADY!!!!!
NewEra wrote:Well look on the bright side. At least we’re not the Nets. Get some rest guys.
GONYK wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I don't really see the benefit of that. Either way, the minute distribution is the same.
I also don't think a competent two-way PG is easy to get, backup or otherwise.
Kemba is just here to soak up non-Rose mins
Monk1718 wrote:BBALLER4FR wrote:LOL! SPike gave his seats to Cole's mom. GET THAT MAN OUT OF THE GARDEN ALREADY!!!!!
I’ll give Cole’s mom a seat
robillionaire wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I hate to tell you this but rose isn't an actual starting pg either, I know he's been really good for us but he's a backup, and I'm sure there were reasons that plenty of teams have felt they were better off without him as well, including the cavs, pistons, timberwolves, and knicks in 2017
robillionaire wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I hate to tell you this but rose isn't an actual starting pg either, I know he's been really good for us but he's a backup, and I'm sure there were reasons that plenty of teams have felt they were better off without him as well, including the cavs, pistons, timberwolves, and knicks in 2017
ADeP7 wrote:Rj is very much available
Leon’s got eyes on a few guards and rj is going to be added with ease
Wharton Alum 08 wrote:robillionaire wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I hate to tell you this but rose isn't an actual starting pg either, I know he's been really good for us but he's a backup, and I'm sure there were reasons that plenty of teams have felt they were better off without him as well, including the cavs, pistons, timberwolves, and knicks in 2017
Rose is the victim of a lot of narratives. He's judged against 2011 Rose. If you strip the name you have a top 15-20ish PG easily. He's only not a starter in name he's humbled himself but there's no reason he shouldn't have been starting over inferior guards like Jeff Teague, Killian Hayes and Elfrid Payton.