ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,095
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#321 » by winforlose » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:48 am

shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.


Adams is kinda washed up and kinda over rated.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,095
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#322 » by winforlose » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:53 am

Domejandro wrote:
shrink wrote:We need a big bruiser who can defend and rebound.

Does Derrick Favors have anything left in the tank? I’m sure OKC would give him up cheap - they got a 1st for absorbing his contract last year.

If Minnesota had useless expirings, Minnesota could get him for free since he has two years left, but unfortunately I don’t think he has enough left in the tank to justify trading our existing players for him. Would be an awesome rotational piece, though.


I checked and we could trade Prince for Favors straight up. Honestly, Favors would slot into Prince’s minutes anyway. You would play Favors with Reid and Vando. The downside is lack of shooting on the perimeter, but the upside is 3 big bodies down low to rebound and throw it back in. Lineups Dlo, Ant, JO, MCD, KAT. Beverly, Beasley, V8, Reid, Favors. You still have depth in every position with JMAC, Nowell, and Leo covering 1-3 and Layman who in a dire pinch can cover the 3-4 but would probably only be used if 4 or 5 guys were out and was absolutely necessary.

Edit to add, while Favors would be an extra year commitment, his salary is significantly lower than Princes. This move plus the trade exemption from the original Prince for Rubio move would give the wolves real money to work with either signing a 15th player (less likely at this point,) or trading for one and staying under the cap later. Favors makes 9.7 this year, Prince makes 13.0
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,516
And1: 6,591
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#323 » by shangrila » Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:17 pm

winforlose wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.


Adams is kinda washed up and kinda over rated.

He’s the same player he’s always been.

Is he perfect? No. Is he perfect for what we need? Yes.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,345
And1: 19,374
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#324 » by shrink » Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:50 pm

shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

I gave it a +1 because I think he’s the “type” of player we need. However, I agree with winlose that I’m not too sure what he’s got left right now, plus I think anyone who’s exclusively a center might be limited for minutes, unless we push some of Towns minutes to PF. I like the concept though.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,095
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#325 » by winforlose » Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:57 pm

shrink wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

I gave it a +1 because I think he’s the “type” of player we need. However, I agree with winlose that I’m not too sure what he’s got left right now, plus I think anyone who’s exclusively a center might be limited for minutes, unless we push some of Towns minutes to PF. I like the concept though.


Just a heads up WFL is a faster abbreviation than winlose but I did get a kick out of it.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,697
And1: 3,394
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#326 » by BlacJacMac » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:17 pm

winforlose wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.


Adams is kinda washed up and kinda over rated.


He just turned 28 and is averaging 13/13/5 on the young season...
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#327 » by Krapinsky » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:47 pm

shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.


Seems like Adams is more important to them as a starting 5 than he is to us as a back up 5 behind our franchise player, so conceptually I just don’t see it.

I also don’t see Adams and Towns playing together.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#328 » by Krapinsky » Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:51 pm

winforlose wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
shrink wrote:We need a big bruiser who can defend and rebound.

Does Derrick Favors have anything left in the tank? I’m sure OKC would give him up cheap - they got a 1st for absorbing his contract last year.

If Minnesota had useless expirings, Minnesota could get him for free since he has two years left, but unfortunately I don’t think he has enough left in the tank to justify trading our existing players for him. Would be an awesome rotational piece, though.


I checked and we could trade Prince for Favors straight up. Honestly, Favors would slot into Prince’s minutes anyway. You would play Favors with Reid and Vando. The downside is lack of shooting on the perimeter, but the upside is 3 big bodies down low to rebound and throw it back in. Lineups Dlo, Ant, JO, MCD, KAT. Beverly, Beasley, V8, Reid, Favors. You still have depth in every position with JMAC, Nowell, and Leo covering 1-3 and Layman who in a dire pinch can cover the 3-4 but would probably only be used if 4 or 5 guys were out and was absolutely necessary.

Edit to add, while Favors would be an extra year commitment, his salary is significantly lower than Princes. This move plus the trade exemption from the original Prince for Rubio move would give the wolves real money to work with either signing a 15th player (less likely at this point,) or trading for one and staying under the cap later. Favors makes 9.7 this year, Prince makes 13.0


I’d rather keep Prince personally. I think we could get a comparable player to Favors without having to take on that contract. We only need a guy that will play 12-15 minutes per game most nights.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,300
And1: 2,639
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#329 » by thinktank » Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:25 pm

Based on what’s out there, I would rather cut a guy and pick up the biggest, baddest D Leaguer, whoever that is. If possible.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,345
And1: 19,374
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#330 » by shrink » Mon Oct 25, 2021 6:49 pm

winforlose wrote:
shrink wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

I gave it a +1 because I think he’s the “type” of player we need. However, I agree with winlose that I’m not too sure what he’s got left right now, plus I think anyone who’s exclusively a center might be limited for minutes, unless we push some of Towns minutes to PF. I like the concept though.


Just a heads up WFL is a faster abbreviation than winlose but I did get a kick out of it.

LOL! Two things..

1. As I get older, it looks like I’m starting to butcher poster names - not just player names! Yikes!

2. Also, we older guys need to be careful when we use initials, because it might be an acronym for some internet term we don’t even know. I’m glad WFL is safe - I’ll try not to call you WTF. :wink:
wolfen
Senior
Posts: 703
And1: 216
Joined: Apr 05, 2014
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#331 » by wolfen » Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:31 pm

Haven't read through the thread (and haven't posted in quite awhile) but here's what I'm thinking, and tell me if I'm on to something or I'm on something...

Simmons would be great, yes. But if he were magically on the wolves tonight and started, would he guard Valancunas? I'm thinking no. I'm concerned about getting a big who actually guards opposing centers.

Anyways, I have an idea for an "overpay" for an "unknown". It would involve trading for a rookie from another team who isn't even in said team's rotation, because he's a rookie, and there are supposedly better vet options. I know trades like this don't even happen, but why couldn't they? I still think Jericho Sims (knicks) would be the perfect get to add to this roster to guard the bigger bigs and help on the boards. He's older for a rookie so he's not so green. NYK have plenty of bigs - Robinson, Noel, Gibson, Randle, Toppin, Sumanic. At 6-10, 250 lbs, 7-4 wingspan, and super athletic, he'd be perfect for the wolves. Is Nowell for Sims fair or even doable? If not, any other trade possibilities that could bring in Simms using spare parts?

PS - I was SCREAMING for us to trade back into late round 2 to nab him in the draft, he went 2 from the end!!!
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,328
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#332 » by King Malta » Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:27 pm

shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.


I don't hate the idea of getting Steven Adams to add some muscle and rebounding into the back-up 5 spot, I'm just not thrilled about giving up Beasley to do it, even though Adams' salary would be hard to match up otherwise.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,095
And1: 5,720
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#333 » by winforlose » Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:05 pm

@Shangrila

My take is that Naz cannot be moved as part of this deal. The whole net gain is for Adams to start beside KAT and rotate to play Reid as well. With the trade exemption we can send Beasley for Adams straight up or throw in Layman if they want him for expiring value. I would not add picks to it as I don’t see Adam’s as still being as good as he was with OKC (see last seasons numbers,) but I am not opposed so long as the cost was only Beasley. We need size and rebounding ASAP.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,912
And1: 2,531
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#334 » by Slim Tubby » Tue Oct 26, 2021 12:20 am

shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

On the contrary…I though it was a very creative idea that I’d do in a minute.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,516
And1: 6,591
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#335 » by shangrila » Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:28 am

Slim Tubby wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

On the contrary…I though it was a very creative idea that I’d do in a minute.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:kiss
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,328
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#336 » by King Malta » Tue Oct 26, 2021 1:40 am

shangrila wrote:
Slim Tubby wrote:
shangrila wrote:So I guess nobody likes my Steven Adams idea.

On the contrary…I though it was a very creative idea that I’d do in a minute.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:kiss


DLo for Adams and filler.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,368
And1: 862
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#337 » by Norseman79 » Tue Oct 26, 2021 2:32 am

Anyone who still doesn't see the need for a physical big is just delusional
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,552
And1: 3,719
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#338 » by FinnTheHuman » Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:08 am

A simple Kevin Love for D'Angelo Russell swap would work magic for us imo. Cavs got Sexton/Garland/Rubio/Okoro at the guard positions, so they have no incentive to do this deal, so I'd be down to even sweeten it with a lottery protected 1st rounder or a couple of 2nds so that they accept the deal. Or maybe find a 3rd team that gets DLo for a couple of overpaid ~15 mil guys that they want to get rid of.

Kevin Love is ironically a great fit with his skillset for us imo. We gamble on his health, but yea.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,644
And1: 5,158
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#339 » by minimus » Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:46 am

FinnTheHuman wrote:A simple Kevin Love for D'Angelo Russell swap would work magic for us imo. Cavs got Sexton/Garland/Rubio/Okoro at the guard positions, so they have no incentive to do this deal, so I'd be down to even sweeten it with a lottery protected 1st rounder or a couple of 2nds so that they accept the deal. Or maybe find a 3rd team that gets DLo for a couple of overpaid ~15 mil guys that they want to get rid of.

Kevin Love is ironically a great fit with his skillset for us imo. We gamble on his health, but yea.


How weird modern NBA is that even washed, mentally broken 33yo Love will ourebound most starting PF and entire Wolves frontcourt.




The real problem is that he cant hit anything, even from mid range. I think his passing and rebounding will be always elite, but without shooting he is not a starter quality big. I dont know if his shooting slump is related to bad shape though
FinnTheHuman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,552
And1: 3,719
Joined: Nov 22, 2012
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Nine) (READ FIRST POST) 

Post#340 » by FinnTheHuman » Tue Oct 26, 2021 11:55 am

minimus wrote:
FinnTheHuman wrote:A simple Kevin Love for D'Angelo Russell swap would work magic for us imo. Cavs got Sexton/Garland/Rubio/Okoro at the guard positions, so they have no incentive to do this deal, so I'd be down to even sweeten it with a lottery protected 1st rounder or a couple of 2nds so that they accept the deal. Or maybe find a 3rd team that gets DLo for a couple of overpaid ~15 mil guys that they want to get rid of.

Kevin Love is ironically a great fit with his skillset for us imo. We gamble on his health, but yea.


How weird modern NBA is that even washed, mentally broken 33yo Love will ourebound most starting PF and entire Wolves frontcourt.



The real problem is that he cant hit anything, even from mid range. I think his passing and rebounding will be always elite, but without shooting he is not a starter quality big. I dont know if his shooting slump is related to bad shape though


We wouldn't need him to shoot if he can't, just let him play in the low post and create from there. But I'm confident he could regain his jumper partially after playing himself into better shape over time. Anyways, as you said, you get him for rebounding, passing, moving without the ball, and being a decent positional defender.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves