LoveMyRaps wrote:This draft class has been the biggest NBA story this year IMO. Best since '03, stacked with a bunch of special players.
Way too early for this.
2008
2009
2011
2014
2018
are all solid drafts. 2012 is not too bad either.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
LoveMyRaps wrote:This draft class has been the biggest NBA story this year IMO. Best since '03, stacked with a bunch of special players.
Golden Knight wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:This draft class has been the biggest NBA story this year IMO. Best since '03, stacked with a bunch of special players.
Way too early for this.
2008
2009
2011
2014
2018
are all solid drafts. 2012 is not too bad either.
Tripod wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Tripod wrote:
you dont understand mobley doesnt have to score 20 ppg like barnes to be effective. your just arguing for raw output but my eye says they are several tiers away. mobley is not a mvp caliber now but will be very soon depending on his 3pt jumper.
barnes is not the prospect i thought hes not dishing out 5 plus assists like scottie pippen and he has no 3pt.

DroseReturnChi wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:Mobley 1, Barnes 0 in the head to head match. Mobley was slightly better than Barnes today. If Mobley was more assertive offensively, it wouldn't have been even close.
you dont understand mobley doesnt have to score 20 ppg like barnes to be effective. your just arguing for raw output but my eye says they are several tiers away. mobley is not a mvp caliber now but will be very soon depending on his 3pt jumper.
barnes is not the prospect i thought hes not dishing out 5 plus assists like scottie pippen and he has no 3pt.
Shy Gorgeous-Al wrote:Don't know who won the matchup between Barnes or Mobley, probably Mobley, but it doesn't matter.
I will say that Mobley's defensive impact has not been the same in the last stretch of games compared to the start. The fatigue is setting in, most likely.
yoyoboy wrote:Mobley’s priority definitely needs to be getting himself in the weight room right now, so that his rebounding and his ability to finish through contact can improve.
JonFromVA wrote:Shy Gorgeous-Al wrote:Don't know who won the matchup between Barnes or Mobley, probably Mobley, but it doesn't matter.
I will say that Mobley's defensive impact has not been the same in the last stretch of games compared to the start. The fatigue is setting in, most likely.
Yep, I've been seeing it as well. He also twisted his ankle a few games back which sometimes lingers even if not completely obvious.
Since his motor was a question mark in College, it's something to watch and try to figure out.
Maybe Bickerstaff's plan it to power drive him through the rookie wall ...
DroseReturnChi wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:Mobley 1, Barnes 0 in the head to head match. Mobley was slightly better than Barnes today. If Mobley was more assertive offensively, it wouldn't have been even close.
you dont understand mobley doesnt have to score 20 ppg like barnes to be effective. your just arguing for raw output but my eye says they are several tiers away. mobley is not a mvp caliber now but will be very soon depending on his 3pt jumper.
barnes is not the prospect i thought hes not dishing out 5 plus assists like scottie pippen and he has no 3pt.
CptCrunch wrote:Cade is now at 11 assist to 13 turnovers. I've stated back in May and June pre-draft that Cade is not a point guard prospect. While his vision is decent for his size, his passing skills (in terms of ball placement) are poor and his handles loose. He has not at any point shown that can be play PG in this league. His assist to turnover is historically bad for a point guard prospect. No successful point guard has ever been drafted with his style of sub 1 assist to turnover ratio in college.
Without that PG tag, he is just an unathletic SG/SF on a cold streak. He is an elite shooter. There is no doubt that his shot will come along.

