The4thHorseman wrote:Joshyjess wrote:The4thHorseman wrote:You're not making sense.
If MJ made Pippen, then why are you giving MJ all this credit for making a player who you say can easily be replaced? If Pip is nothing special, why praise MJ for "making" him that way?
Because it goes to the kind of player that Jordan was - he could take a player like Pippen and make him into a household name. He could have probably taken quite a few guys and done the same thing with them. The less "special" that Pippen was, the more credit that Jordan gets.
But you're acting as if Pippen was the 35th pick in the draft, instead of the 5th overall.
Why did MJ wait until his 4th year in the league to work on making a teammate a household name? You speculating that he could have done it for quite a few guys, yet for some reason he chose not to? Why is that?
Various reasons. There were some other teams that were better during Jordan's early career. By Jordan's fourth year, those teams were no longer in his way.
Most players get better as they get older. I mean did Lebron win anything right away?
Sometimes it takes a while for things to fall into place before people start winning.
Jordan didn't go out to make Pippen better. Jordan focused on his own game, making himself the best he could be and in that process, the guy who was there with him (Pippen) started looking (and of course playing) better as well.
Yes Pippen was a good player perhaps even borderline great player (yeah, I know I said mediocre originally, but that was just a bit of hyperbole), but there's no way I believe that other players couldn't have done the same thing Pippen did in the similar situation. Again, having watched the Bulls during the entire time of their dynasty, I never had that "wow" factor form Pippen.
If others disagree with me, no problem, but I will stick by my original post that Pippen was only as famous as he was because of Jordan.
Seeing Pippen come out now and attacking Jordan (and whoever else gets on his radar) just makes no sense to me.