Kanyewest wrote:nate33 wrote:Kanyewest wrote:Spoiler:
That study doesn't pass the smell test.
It says that in the month of September, 40,274 unvaccinated 18-29 year-olds contracted Covid and 84 of them died. That's an infection fatality ratio of 0.2%, or 1 in 500. We have lots of data (from the pre-vaccine era) that shows that the IFR of Covid for 18-29 year-olds is on the order of 0.01%, or 1 in 10,000. Essentially, the study is saying that unvaccinated people in Texas are dying at 20X the national rate.
I assume that Texas has fairly accurate data for deaths (though there is that pesky distinction between deaths by Covid and deaths with Covid), which means their data on infections is off by an order of magnitude. With infection rate measurement that erroneous, I don't see how the infection data can be useful.
Death rates for 18-29 are actually lower nationally around 4,618 deaths (https://data.cdc.gov/widgets/9bhg-hcku?mobile_redirect=true) for 8.4 million cases https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254271/us-total-number-of-covid-cases-by-age-group/. So it seems that unvaccinated Texans are doing worse nationally in that subset if it is 1 out of 500.
But the big point is that deaths in the 50 and older crowd is higher which is where more than 85-90% of the deaths are occurring nationally. Less than 1% of the deaths are occurring between 18-29 demographic https://data.cdc.gov/widgets/9bhg-hcku?mobile_redirect=true
Still, that doesn't mean that those in the younger demographic don't have side effects. And of course they can spread them to more critically vulnerable people in the population. In August only around 50% of nursing home workers were vaccinated https://www.texastribune.org/2021/08/13/coronavirus-texas-nursing-homes-staff/
My 1 in 10,000 number was pre-vaccine. Obviously, post-vaccine, the IFR has dropped.
And there's no way Texas actually has an IFR of 1 in 500 for 18-29. My point is, their data for number of infections is clearly incomplete, rendering the entire study pointless.













