jakecronus8 wrote:WRau1 wrote:Baddy Chuck wrote:So yes, they did. You answered it yourself.
Tucker ain't a dollar, but they tried to replace a 50 cent piece with a couple pennies and a nickel.
Cheaping out and not feeling comfortable paying a 36yr old $7mil/year for multiple years isn't the same thing.
Far far more when you factor in the luxury tax. I was fine letting Pj go when I saw the numbers. He served his purpose.
I really don't understand why any fan would care about the numbers at this point. The cost of our core means external spending is extremely limited. This isn't the old days when hoarding cap space and absorbing bad contracts for picks was more entertaining than the stuff happening on the court. So we're just concerned for the profit margins of billionaires borrowing against a massively appreciated asset?













