GOAT by .5

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,169
And1: 8,533
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

GOAT by .5 

Post#1 » by SNPA » Sun Dec 26, 2021 12:59 am

Whatever criteria you want.

GOAT by .5. (Filled out a few to illustrate idea)

.5 -
1 -
1.5 -
2 - Jordan
2.5 - Drexler
3 -
3.5 - Bird
4 -
4.5 - Duncan
5 - Russel
5.5 - Yao

5.5 is 7’3 and over so no KAJ/Wilt, etc.
.5 is sub 6’ listed height.

Is Manu at 1.5 crazy?
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,536
And1: 7,144
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#2 » by falcolombardi » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:03 am

could you explain a bit more? is this about greater player at each height?
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,375
And1: 9,924
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#3 » by penbeast0 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:10 am

Must be a metric thing . . .
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,169
And1: 8,533
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#4 » by SNPA » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:12 am

falcolombardi wrote:could you explain a bit more? is this about greater player at each height?

Natural position, as you define it.

I just put heights for the outliers to keep it clean.

And a player can hold more than one spot. I have Bird at 4 too.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,375
And1: 9,924
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#5 » by penbeast0 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:17 am

So, natural positions to me are small guard (can't guard swing men), combo guard, swing man, combo forward, big man, and supergiant? The trouble is that doesn't match your listed players well. You really need to define your OP a lot more clearly.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 15,018
And1: 11,523
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#6 » by Cavsfansince84 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:19 am

.5 Isiah
1.0 Magic
1.5 West
2.0 MJ
2.5 Gervin
3.0 LeBron
3.5 LeBron
4.0 Bird
4.5 Duncan
5.0 KAJ
5.5 Yao
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,169
And1: 8,533
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#7 » by SNPA » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:20 am

penbeast0 wrote:So, natural positions to me are small guard (can't guard swing men), combo guard, swing man, combo forward, big man, and supergiant? The trouble is that doesn't match your listed players well. You really need to define your OP a lot more clearly.

Mapping your terms…

Small guard - 1
Combo guard - 1.5
Swing man - 2.5
Combo Forward - 3.5
Big man - 4.5/5
Supergiant- 5.5
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,806
And1: 16,400
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#8 » by Dr Positivity » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:26 am

0.5 Iverson
1 Paul
1.5 West
2 Jordan
2.5 Drexler
3 Erving
3.5 Lebron
4 Dirk
4.5 Duncan
5 Russell
5.5 Kareem

I'm not even going to try to rate Magic
Liberate The Zoomers
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,169
And1: 8,533
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#9 » by SNPA » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:34 am

Dr Positivity wrote:0.5 Iverson
1 Paul
1.5 West
2 Jordan
2.5 Drexler
3 Erving
3.5 Lebron
4 Dirk
4.5 Duncan
5 Russell
5.5 Kareem

I'm not even going to try to rate Magic


I was trying to keep this open to criteria but felt the ends of the spectrum needed perimeters so the true giants and tinys had slots. I specifically thought of AI in doing this, that’s were the listed 6’ height comes from. AI is 6’. I don’t think he belongs with Muggsy, Spud and co.

https://www.nba.com/stats/player/947/career/
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,536
And1: 7,144
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#10 » by falcolombardi » Sun Dec 26, 2021 1:58 am

defining positions is really tricky because there are at least 4 factors to consider: height/wingpsan, width/build. offensive role and defensive role

jokic is a center but he is also essentially his team
-point guard-

durant is technically a wing (3) has the height of a center (5) plays the -power forward- role in defense (4) as secondary rim protector and offensively plays the offensive role of a traditional -shooting guard- (2)

however his slender build doesnt fit the traditional defensive power forward profile (let alone center) but it does in modern basketball meta of slimmer and more mobile wings protecting thw rim and perimeter

giannis alternates between a (4) and (5) in defense and between a (1) and (5) in offense

etc

anyway if i tried to define positions tjis way i would go with somethingh like this, going more by size and body Type than role played for simplicity sake

0.5 isiah thomas (fairly small guards)

1 chris paul (slightly taller AND wider/heavier)

1.5 Stephen curry (in other eras or leagues a point guard curry size is fairly big, modern nba seems to have bigger point guards in average although i dont have actual data to back up my hunch)

2 dwane wade? i am unsure if kobe goes here or in 2.5 since wade is a lot wider than him

2.5 jordan (same thingh as with kobe, he could be a 2 too)

3 julius erving

3.5 lebron james (can play the 4 and defend smaller bigs)

4 larry bird (natural position tbh, duncan is a center)

4.5 bill russel/tim duncan* (center but i cannot put him at 5 because there are bigger 5's, and 5's even bigger than those)

5 kareem/wilt? (the archetypical giants, albeit in very different builds, in reality they are much bigger than your average center but i need to make space for the supergiants)

5.5 shaq (way heavier at peak than wilt even if height/reach is similar)

supergiants or "6" would be players like arvydas sabonis
yao ming or even height super outliers like manute bol
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,806
And1: 16,400
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#11 » by Dr Positivity » Sun Dec 26, 2021 2:30 am

SNPA wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:0.5 Iverson
1 Paul
1.5 West
2 Jordan
2.5 Drexler
3 Erving
3.5 Lebron
4 Dirk
4.5 Duncan
5 Russell
5.5 Kareem

I'm not even going to try to rate Magic


I was trying to keep this open to criteria but felt the ends of the spectrum needed perimeters so the true giants and tinys had slots. I specifically thought of AI in doing this, that’s were the listed 6’ height comes from. AI is 6’. I don’t think he belongs with Muggsy, Spud and co.

https://www.nba.com/stats/player/947/career/


Muggsy is probably a 0 here. I think 5'11 or 6'0 is about right for Iverson, so maybe I could go with someone shorter for 0.5. I remember in his football highlights his size looks decent compared to regular people.
Liberate The Zoomers
fjd0913
Ballboy
Posts: 30
And1: 16
Joined: Nov 06, 2021

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#12 » by fjd0913 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 3:15 am

0.5 - Calvin Murphy

1 - Nash

1.5 - Curry

2 - Miller

2.5 - Jordan

3 - Pippen

3.5 - Lebron

4 - Malone

4.5 - Duncan

5 - Kareem

5.5 - Yao, or Walton if he makes the cut (I think he was around 7'3" IIRC)
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,375
And1: 9,924
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#13 » by penbeast0 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 5:06 am

Walton was around 6'11, Bill Russell/Tim Duncan sized but a bit heavier built.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,375
And1: 9,924
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#14 » by penbeast0 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 5:13 am

Below 5'9: Muggsy (yes, Calvin Murphy is too tall, lol)
5'9-6'1: John Stockton
6-2 to 6-5: Steph Curry
6-6 to 6-9: LeBron James
6-10 to 7-1: Bill Russell
7-2 or taller: Kareem
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,169
And1: 8,533
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#15 » by SNPA » Sun Dec 26, 2021 5:32 am

penbeast0 wrote:Below 5'9: Muggsy (yes, Calvin Murphy is too tall, lol)
5'9-6'1: John Stockton
6-2 to 6-5: Steph Curry
6-6 to 6-9: LeBron James
6-10 to 7-1: Bill Russell
7-2 or taller: Kareem

Was hoping for more by role than height.

Ex. I’d have James at PG, same for Magic.

We all know the standard choices for GOAT by 1-5, I think adding tweeners makes for interesting insight and conversation.
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,854
And1: 10,488
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#16 » by Statlanta » Sun Dec 26, 2021 5:35 am

.5 - Chris Paul
1 - Steph Curry
1.5 - Jerry West
2 - Michael Jordan
2.5 - Kawhi Leonard
3 - Julius Erving
3.5 - LeBron James
4 - Dirk Nowitzki
4.5 - Duncan
5 - Bill Russell
5.5 - Kareem Abdul Jabbar
The Greatest of All Time debate in basketball is essentially who has the greatest basketball resume of the player who has the best highlights instead of who is the best player
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,536
And1: 7,144
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#17 » by falcolombardi » Sun Dec 26, 2021 6:05 am

[streamable][/streamable]
penbeast0 wrote:Walton was around 6'11, Bill Russell/Tim Duncan sized but a bit heavier built.


didnt walton intentionally lowball his height (only player other than Kevin garnett i have heard of doing that) cause he thought it was weird to say he was bigger than 7 feet?
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 450
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#18 » by feyki » Sun Dec 26, 2021 8:12 am

SNPA wrote:Whatever criteria you want.

GOAT by .5. (Filled out a few to illustrate idea)

.5 - CP
1 - Curry
1.5 - West
2 - Jordan
2.5 - Oscar
3 - Erving
3.5 - LBJ, Magic second
4 - Bird
4.5 - Duncan
5 - Russel
5.5 - Yao

5.5 is 7’3 and over so no KAJ/Wilt, etc.
.5 is sub 6’ listed height.

Is Manu at 1.5 crazy?


Listed.
Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”
Dutchball97
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,408
And1: 5,004
Joined: Mar 28, 2020
   

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#19 » by Dutchball97 » Sun Dec 26, 2021 8:14 am

.5 - Slater Martin
1 - Magic Johnson
1.5 - Jerry West
2 - Michael Jordan
2.5 - John Havlicek
3 - Julius Erving
3.5 - LeBron James
4 - Karl Malone
4.5 - Tim Duncan
5 - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
5.5 - Yao Ming

I don't really see too much value in the .5 and 5.5 categories as they don't play different roles than 1 and 5 respectively, they're just unusually short/tall for the league.

Besides that the most surprising thing to me in this excercise is how many of the best PFs were either bigs who played both the 4 and 5 (Duncan, KG, Dirk, Pettit) or combo forwards who spent significant time at both forward positions (LeBron, Bird, KD, Barkley). Karl Malone isn't a bad choice but he pretty much wins by default. Maybe Giannis could make a case because I'm not entirely sure whether 3.5 or 4.5 would be accurate for him.

2.5 is kind of tough as you could technically put MJ and Kobe there but I really don't view either if them as anything but a shooting guard.
Owly
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,641
And1: 3,157
Joined: Mar 12, 2010

Re: GOAT by .5 

Post#20 » by Owly » Sun Dec 26, 2021 9:23 am

SNPA wrote:Was hoping for more by role than height.

I think including non-positions defined by height (0.5, 5.5) may have confused the issue. This is arguably also seen in the number of 0.5's given that don't meet your height criteria (or maybe people just taking it as a loose guide and ignoring listed height, and perhaps misspelling Isaiah for the smaller, more recent Thomas).

It might have been better to ask about "tiny" and "super giant" players separately from best at (half) positions.

Oh and Russell (Bill) is double l.


I'd throw in Terrell Brandon for consideration in the (major league era) listed under 6ft guards. Doesn't have the HoF or longevity of Murphy, the box-peak of Isaiah Thomas or the team success of Martin. And his box-production peak looks deflated by a slow paced team in a slowing era. But he's the second highest production peak (25.2 PER, .237 WS/48. 7.5 BPM) but without being a defensive liability (Thomas was, Murphy - though tough - may have been) and is then good when he plays, though injuries and longevity are a negative.

Return to Player Comparisons