Celts17Pride wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Bane is gone......move on.
Can't move on until the people making the decisions move on.
Didn’t know brad stevens was gm then....interesting
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Celts17Pride wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Bane is gone......move on.
Can't move on until the people making the decisions move on.
ddb wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:CeltsFlow wrote:Yeah, I say no to Fox, we need shooters, and he's looked downright awful this season at times, not just shooting threes but his driving game took a step back as well
Plan for this team always was Beal, I doubt that has changed.
Like listen to Brad today, he essentially said that he's not going to trade a Smart or Rob unless it's for a meaningful change, aka as Beal.
Yup I agree. There's a strong probability that Beal has been the plan for awhile now. The lazy analysis is to say there's a connection between Tatum & Beal...But in all reality that connection is beyond the majority of relationships that players have with their peers. Tatum/Beal are "brothers from different mothers" and their relationship is about as family orientated as you're going to find in the league.
Teams/players have to be careful about tampering rules. But with that said, I'd say there's a safe bet that Tatum/Beal/Brad Stevens understand that there's a real possibility of Beal joining Tatum in Boston. Beyond that I think the next question becomes does Brad & his staff envision a Beal/Tatum/Brown trio? Or are they keeping the relationship with Brown strong, but with the intent of possibly moving Brown for a star that better fits Beal/Tatum once Beal is in place?
MagicBagley18 wrote:[instagram][/instagram]Celts17Pride wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:Bane is gone......move on.
Can't move on until the people making the decisions move on.
Didn’t know brad stevens was gm then....interesting
Celts17Pride wrote:MagicBagley18 wrote:[instagram][/instagram]Celts17Pride wrote:Can't move on until the people making the decisions move on.
Didn’t know brad stevens was gm then....interesting
A Ainge
TheOGJabroni wrote:ddb wrote:GoCeltics123 wrote:Plan for this team always was Beal, I doubt that has changed.
Like listen to Brad today, he essentially said that he's not going to trade a Smart or Rob unless it's for a meaningful change, aka as Beal.
Yup I agree. There's a strong probability that Beal has been the plan for awhile now. The lazy analysis is to say there's a connection between Tatum & Beal...But in all reality that connection is beyond the majority of relationships that players have with their peers. Tatum/Beal are "brothers from different mothers" and their relationship is about as family orientated as you're going to find in the league.
Teams/players have to be careful about tampering rules. But with that said, I'd say there's a safe bet that Tatum/Beal/Brad Stevens understand that there's a real possibility of Beal joining Tatum in Boston. Beyond that I think the next question becomes does Brad & his staff envision a Beal/Tatum/Brown trio? Or are they keeping the relationship with Brown strong, but with the intent of possibly moving Brown for a star that better fits Beal/Tatum once Beal is in place?
I fully understand going after Beal when the timing is right but I don't love the pairing with Brown & Tatum. I know a lot of people won't want to hear it but I'd rather have Simmons than Brown with that core. Brown is the better player though and maybe we can get some extra pieces in a deal with Philly that could help ignite a trade with the Wizards.
This is IF Beal pretty much says "trade me to Boston":
Boston in:
Simmons (PHI)
Beal (WSH)
Bertans (WSH)
Philly in:
Brown (BOS)
Smart (BOS)
Washington in:
Maxey (PHI)
Horford (BOS)
Hernangomez (BOS)
Draft compensation (BOS)
Boston gets a couple stars and one pretty bad contract in Bertans. Philly gets Brown & Smart for Maxey & Simmons (who refuses to play for them). Washington gets Maxey as the prized young player along with draft compensation from us.
BostonCouchGM wrote:TheOGJabroni wrote:ddb wrote:
Yup I agree. There's a strong probability that Beal has been the plan for awhile now. The lazy analysis is to say there's a connection between Tatum & Beal...But in all reality that connection is beyond the majority of relationships that players have with their peers. Tatum/Beal are "brothers from different mothers" and their relationship is about as family orientated as you're going to find in the league.
Teams/players have to be careful about tampering rules. But with that said, I'd say there's a safe bet that Tatum/Beal/Brad Stevens understand that there's a real possibility of Beal joining Tatum in Boston. Beyond that I think the next question becomes does Brad & his staff envision a Beal/Tatum/Brown trio? Or are they keeping the relationship with Brown strong, but with the intent of possibly moving Brown for a star that better fits Beal/Tatum once Beal is in place?
I fully understand going after Beal when the timing is right but I don't love the pairing with Brown & Tatum. I know a lot of people won't want to hear it but I'd rather have Simmons than Brown with that core. Brown is the better player though and maybe we can get some extra pieces in a deal with Philly that could help ignite a trade with the Wizards.
This is IF Beal pretty much says "trade me to Boston":
Boston in:
Simmons (PHI)
Beal (WSH)
Bertans (WSH)
Philly in:
Brown (BOS)
Smart (BOS)
Washington in:
Maxey (PHI)
Horford (BOS)
Hernangomez (BOS)
Draft compensation (BOS)
Boston gets a couple stars and one pretty bad contract in Bertans. Philly gets Brown & Smart for Maxey & Simmons (who refuses to play for them). Washington gets Maxey as the prized young player along with draft compensation from us.
Realistic trade for Beal would be for Jaylen because then he could go be his wokest self with the other lizard people in D.C. and nurture his impending political career, with a third team involved to take care of draft picks and salary considerations.

MagicBagley18 wrote:Even if I think they should trade for him the most likely thing the Celtics do is pass on dame....get beal with the S&t and then see how the fit is w the jays.
If it’s redundant or doesn’t work you just move brown after the fact. Getting beal if they did, not only improves the team but just creates paths of flexibility for us that we need.
The Comedian wrote:Pretty much every team passed on Bane, harping on the Celtics trading the pick is silly.

playa-hater wrote:The Comedian wrote:Pretty much every team passed on Bane, harping on the Celtics trading the pick is silly.
There is a big difference between a team passing on bane versus selling our pick just to get some tax money. At least the other team has a young prospect to show in its place place we have the guy we got rid of twice Enis Kanter.
You might say we also passed on him 3 different times so it's much worse for Boston
The Comedian wrote:playa-hater wrote:The Comedian wrote:Pretty much every team passed on Bane, harping on the Celtics trading the pick is silly.
There is a big difference between a team passing on bane versus selling our pick just to get some tax money. At least the other team has a young prospect to show in its place place we have the guy we got rid of twice Enis Kanter.
You might say we also passed on him 3 different times so it's much worse for Boston
Moving the pick was bad, nobody has said otherwise. But blasting them for being one of the 29 teams that passed on Bane is silly.

BostonCouchGM wrote:
Realistic trade for Beal would be for Jaylen because then he could go be his wokest self with the other lizard people in D.C. and nurture his impending political career, with a third team involved to take care of draft picks and salary considerations.
Curmudgeon wrote:This thread has become so pathetic. Virtually all the proposals involve more help for Tatum and Brown, plus a few "radical" proposals that involve trading Brown.
So, do you think that Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, Kevin Durant and James Harden might form the core of a contending team?
What about Marcus Smart. Rob Williams, Steph Curry, Draymond Green and Jordan Poole?
What about Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, LeBron James and Anthony Davis (assuming everyone's health)
Lastly, How about Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jrue Holiday?
The problem with the Celtics isn't the lack of help for Tatum and Brown. The problem is Tatum and Brown.
Celts17Pride wrote:
The question is not where Tatum and Brown are right now, it's what are they going to be in 2-3 years.
Celtics fans are just impatient.
Curmudgeon wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:
The question is not where Tatum and Brown are right now, it's what are they going to be in 2-3 years.
Celtics fans are just impatient.
Well, that's the question. I would be more optimistic if either Tatum or Brown had improved one iota between the bubble and now. They have not, and Tatum regressed as soon as he got the big money.
As it is, yes, I'm impatient, not only for a championship (I've given up any hope of banner #18 in my lifetime) but just for some consistently good, unselfish basketball. I want them both gone.
Celts17Pride wrote:Curmudgeon wrote:This thread has become so pathetic. Virtually all the proposals involve more help for Tatum and Brown, plus a few "radical" proposals that involve trading Brown.
So, do you think that Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, Kevin Durant and James Harden might form the core of a contending team?
What about Marcus Smart. Rob Williams, Steph Curry, Draymond Green and Jordan Poole?
What about Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, LeBron James and Anthony Davis (assuming everyone's health)
Lastly, How about Marcus Smart, Rob Williams, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Jrue Holiday?
The problem with the Celtics isn't the lack of help for Tatum and Brown. The problem is Tatum and Brown.
Tatum is 23, Brown is 25
Curry is 33, Green is 31
Lebron is 37, AD is 28
Giannis is 27, Holiday is 31
The question is not where Tatum and Brown are right now, it's what are they going to be in 2-3 years.
Celtics fans are just impatient.
It would be dumb to trade either one in my opinion.