Ron Swanson wrote:Fair enough. This all seems like semantics though, because I can't remember the last time raw plus-minus was used over Per-100 in an actual, serious MVP discussion. And that's coming from someone who even has his own issues with using lineup data of any kind as gospel. I'm not going to completely disregard it, but look no further than last year (Gobert, Mike Conley, Joe Ingles, and Royce O'neal are #1-4 in the entire league...) to illustrate how much (or in this case, little) stock we should put into it.
So, it's understandable that you're not used to seeing it, but it's something I talked about a lot last year as I criticized the way Gobert's MVP candidacy got dismissed.
To be clear: It's not like I only use raw +/- in my analysis, it's just that it's something everyone can understand. I wouldn't use it where I thought it misleading, but whenever you see one star player with super-high raw +/- and the rest of his teammates aren't close, that player is going to look great by any more sophisticated analysis too.
Again, not saying I give my MVP nod to whoever has the highest raw +/-, but it is something I make a point to look at and I don't dismiss it lightly.