Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

CommonerCoffee
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 28, 2015

Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#1 » by CommonerCoffee » Thu Feb 3, 2022 11:37 pm

Who comes to mind when thinking of players that are not offensively potent as the focal point of an opponent's defense but excel when operating as the 2nd option? Are there any historical cases where a player may even be an offensive negative as the 1st option but a strong positive as the 2nd?
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#2 » by Colbinii » Thu Feb 3, 2022 11:45 pm

Its almost impossible to calculate this type of increase to any meaningful capacity but...

Kyrie Irving

Pre-LeBron the team was terrible and, more importantly, the Cavaliers weren't any better with him on the court than with him on the bench. LeBron joins, Kyrie is shifted into a more scoring role with all the defensive focus on James, and Kyrie has a special season [Remember that game against the Spurs?]
SHAQ32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,579
And1: 3,251
Joined: Mar 21, 2013
 

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#3 » by SHAQ32 » Fri Feb 4, 2022 12:45 am

Iverson's efficiency went up in Denver, but I think that had more to do with rule changes and switching conferences
parsnips33
Head Coach
Posts: 7,428
And1: 3,408
Joined: Sep 01, 2014
 

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#4 » by parsnips33 » Fri Feb 4, 2022 12:53 am

Chris Bosh?
User avatar
prolific passer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,149
And1: 1,459
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
     

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#5 » by prolific passer » Fri Feb 4, 2022 3:32 am

I'm thinking of Pippen.
User avatar
henshao
Pro Prospect
Posts: 942
And1: 448
Joined: Jul 29, 2018

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#6 » by henshao » Fri Feb 4, 2022 3:45 am

I think a lot of point guards are going to fall into this description
falcolombardi
General Manager
Posts: 9,511
And1: 7,117
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
       

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#7 » by falcolombardi » Fri Feb 4, 2022 5:06 am

david robinson
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,750
And1: 16,380
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#8 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Feb 4, 2022 6:01 am

Pau was better as the 2nd guy. But he also fit the triangle well.
Liberate The Zoomers
McBubbles
Rookie
Posts: 1,213
And1: 1,361
Joined: Jun 16, 2020

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#9 » by McBubbles » Fri Feb 4, 2022 10:27 am

Pau Gasol is 100% the definitive answer to this question.
You said to me “I will give you scissor seven fine quality animation".

You left then but you put flat mediums which were not good before my scissor seven".

What do you take me for, that you treat somebody like me with such contempt?
LukaTheGOAT
Analyst
Posts: 3,269
And1: 2,977
Joined: Dec 25, 2019
 

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#10 » by LukaTheGOAT » Fri Feb 4, 2022 10:33 am

David Robinson
User avatar
feyki
Veteran
Posts: 2,876
And1: 449
Joined: Aug 08, 2016
     

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#11 » by feyki » Mon Feb 7, 2022 12:55 pm

Garnett.
Image
“The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot.”
User avatar
Ryoga Hibiki
RealGM
Posts: 12,509
And1: 7,712
Joined: Nov 14, 2001
Location: Warszawa now, but from Northern Italy

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#12 » by Ryoga Hibiki » Mon Feb 7, 2022 1:25 pm

Kevin Durant
]:)
Слава Украине!
PistolPeteJR
RealGM
Posts: 11,571
And1: 10,381
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
 

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#13 » by PistolPeteJR » Mon Feb 7, 2022 11:42 pm

Siakam
rand
Analyst
Posts: 3,043
And1: 3,968
Joined: Jun 28, 2013

Re: Biggest offensive impact increase from 1st to 2nd option 

Post#14 » by rand » Tue Feb 8, 2022 7:25 am

CommonerCoffee wrote:Who comes to mind when thinking of players that are not offensively potent as the focal point of an opponent's defense but excel when operating as the 2nd option? Are there any historical cases where a player may even be an offensive negative as the 1st option but a strong positive as the 2nd?

There are no shortage of players who were a larger positive as a 2nd option than a 1st option, but I doubt there are any players who were a strong positive as a 2nd option but producing negative absolute value on offense as the 1st option.

I think the question also has to distinguish by age. Although I can't think of an example off the top of my head, I can imagine a player who as a young rookie is put into the role of being a terrible team's 1st option and struggling badly to the point of being an absolute negative on offense, then moving to a situation where he is a 2nd option behind a superior 1st option at the same time he improves as an offensive player. The offensive delta will appear larger because of the development between the time of being the 1st option vs 2nd, and if the developed player is moved back into a 1st option role they might be an absolute positive on offense at that time.
Colbinii wrote:Its almost impossible to calculate this type of increase to any meaningful capacity but...

Kyrie Irving

Pre-LeBron the team was terrible and, more importantly, the Cavaliers weren't any better with him on the court than with him on the bench. LeBron joins, Kyrie is shifted into a more scoring role with all the defensive focus on James, and Kyrie has a special season [Remember that game against the Spurs?]

I agree that pre-LeBron the Cavs were generally not any better with Kyrie on the floor than off, but I do not think that was because Kyrie as a 1st option was an absolute negative on offense. I think he was a plus offensive player even as their 1st option in his youth but a massive negative on defense resulting in a wash.

Return to Player Comparisons