ImageImageImageImageImage

RJ's Upside

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

GreatWhiteStiff
RealGM
Posts: 15,262
And1: 12,684
Joined: Oct 17, 2011
Location: Overusing finna
 

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#201 » by GreatWhiteStiff » Mon Feb 7, 2022 3:11 am

K-DOT wrote:
-YogiBiz- wrote:
-YogiBiz- wrote:For anyone who cares:

Since 12/31/21 Barret is averaging 22.9 PPG 6.1 RPG 3.2 APG 44.1 FG% 37.6% 3PT%


My math could be wrong but I do believe his TS% is .543 in that time for you analytics dudes and duddettes :wink:

.540

Which to be fair is still below average (average this year is .559), but that would give him a TS+ of 97 (100 is average), which is an improvement from 93 last year.


That strikes me as really sad. You have to take this nested sample of games where he's done well and his TS% needs to improve by 2 or 5 percent or whatever to get to league average. Not good just league average.
Image

Let's playin for 9th!

"OG puts the clamps on point guards like Trae Young." -DelAbbot
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 94,875
And1: 67,606
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#202 » by F N 11 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 3:12 am

A very good nba player.
CEO of the not trading RJ club.
Image
User avatar
BugginOut
Head Coach
Posts: 7,472
And1: 7,835
Joined: May 25, 2014
   

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#203 » by BugginOut » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:08 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Read on Twitter


By basically any metric you look at he is one of the most clutch if not the clutchest player in the league

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/clutch-traditional/?sort=FG_PCT&dir=-1&CF=FGA*G*1&Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%20Season

He more efficient and scores more points in the clutch than Steph Curry, Donovan Mitchell, Luka, James Harden, Jimmy Butler, Giannis, KAT, etc.

He also has the 2nd highest FG% in THE ENTIRE LEAGUE for players who take one FGA in clutch situations, right after Devin Booker.
nyk2017
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 819
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#204 » by nyk2017 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:25 am

The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#205 » by Clyde_Style » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:29 am

nyk2017 wrote:The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.


CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,764
And1: 48,736
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#206 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:32 am

Oscirus wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:As long as Randle is here he should be # 2 to RJ

RJ is the clear # 1 on this current roster. Play that way and he’ll keep improving until he’s a star


It felt like they were 1 & 1A last year. B/W Mitch or Noel not needing the ball, Elfird useless & Bullock spotting up for 3’s, these two controlled the rock.

Last year rj was def no.2, basically used as a floor spreader playing off randles gravity


I didn’t think that. Randle was #1 but RJ had the ball a lot in his hands. Would create for other players or get his own shot.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,047
And1: 22,609
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#207 » by RHODEY » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:38 am

Clyde_Style wrote:It just occurred to me that RJ made moves in this last game that reminded me of Dwayne Wade


Yes with a little dream shake mixed in
Image
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,047
And1: 22,609
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#208 » by RHODEY » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:40 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
nyk2017 wrote:The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.


CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.


He doesn't have much time to improve he's already 21!
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,764
And1: 48,736
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#209 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:42 am

GreatWhiteStiff wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
-YogiBiz- wrote:
My math could be wrong but I do believe his TS% is .543 in that time for you analytics dudes and duddettes :wink:

.540

Which to be fair is still below average (average this year is .559), but that would give him a TS+ of 97 (100 is average), which is an improvement from 93 last year.


That strikes me as really sad. You have to take this nested sample of games where he's done well and his TS% needs to improve by 2 or 5 percent or whatever to get to league average. Not good just league average.


take into account the subpar FT shooting dragging him down. If he gets back to hovering around 75% , his TS % should bump up to near 60%

His efg is a solid 50%.

(FG + (0.5 * 3P)) / FGA
(129 + (0.5 * 38)) / 295
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#210 » by Clyde_Style » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:43 am

RHODEY wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
nyk2017 wrote:The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.


CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.


He doesn't have much time to improve he's already 21!


You’re right. It’s too late. RJ’s ship has sailed. I won’t ever again get emotionally invested in a player unless they are fully developed by 19
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,319
And1: 26,988
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#211 » by Jalen Bluntson » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:48 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.


He doesn't have much time to improve he's already 21!


You’re right. It’s too late. RJ’s ship has sailed. I won’t ever again get emotionally invested in a player unless they are fully developed by 19

RJ should be in his third all-star game by now.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,047
And1: 22,609
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#212 » by RHODEY » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:48 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.


He doesn't have much time to improve he's already 21!


You’re right. It’s too late. RJ’s ship has sailed. I won’t ever again get emotionally invested in a player unless they are fully developed by 19


The problem with Luka, Duncan, and Larry Bird is that they were all 20 years and older as rooks AND they were not athletic. Now Harold Miner...that boy was a GOAT!
Spoiler:
Image
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,528
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#213 » by Oscirus » Mon Feb 7, 2022 5:09 am

Are We Ther Yet wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
He doesn't have much time to improve he's already 21!


You’re right. It’s too late. RJ’s ship has sailed. I won’t ever again get emotionally invested in a player unless they are fully developed by 19

RJ should be in his third all-star game by now.

Derek rose was already a mvp by this point in his career, wtf rj?
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
nyk2017
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 819
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#214 » by nyk2017 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 5:13 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
nyk2017 wrote:The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.


CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.



Well, this offseason, RJ will be eligible for a contract extension. What should he get? Max contract and hope he develops into a franchise player of a Mikal Bridges type of extension (4 years $80-90 million)?
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,528
And1: 9,531
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#215 » by Oscirus » Mon Feb 7, 2022 5:15 am

nyk2017 wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
nyk2017 wrote:The problem with RJ will be that he isn't athletic and can't shoot FT's. If he can't get his FT's up to 80% range, he will be no better than #3 option on a championship team. In the playoffs, teams will force him to his right and make him shoot FT's every time he drives to the basket. These are both his achilles heel (at least at his current stage of development). To take the giant step up to the next level, he need to hit his 3's at 40-42% clip, shoot 80% from FT line and develop a reliable step back jumper. Only then will he move up to a number #2 or #1 option.


CHILL OUT. He attained those 3 % last season already and his FT % will climb over time. The guy is methodical at upgrading his skills.



Well, this offseason, RJ will be eligible for a contract extension. What should he get? Max contract and hope he develops into a franchise player of a Mikal Bridges type of extension (4 years $80-90 million)?

Just cuz he's eligible doesnt mean he has to get it this offseason.
Besides, do people think that rj gonna sign the rookie max and just fall off the face of the earth?
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
User avatar
BugginOut
Head Coach
Posts: 7,472
And1: 7,835
Joined: May 25, 2014
   

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#216 » by BugginOut » Mon Feb 7, 2022 7:27 am

RJ Barrett last year:


RJ Barrett this year:
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,764
And1: 48,736
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#217 » by dakomish23 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 4:06 pm

Read on Twitter
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#218 » by moocow007 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 6:40 pm

GreatWhiteStiff wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
-YogiBiz- wrote:
My math could be wrong but I do believe his TS% is .543 in that time for you analytics dudes and duddettes :wink:

.540

Which to be fair is still below average (average this year is .559), but that would give him a TS+ of 97 (100 is average), which is an improvement from 93 last year.


That strikes me as really sad. You have to take this nested sample of games where he's done well and his TS% needs to improve by 2 or 5 percent or whatever to get to league average. Not good just league average.


On the plus side, you have to realize that he has to really work for his baskets considering the Knicks only real PG is their starting PF.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,634
And1: 18,521
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#219 » by Fury » Mon Feb 7, 2022 6:43 pm

GreatWhiteStiff wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
-YogiBiz- wrote:
My math could be wrong but I do believe his TS% is .543 in that time for you analytics dudes and duddettes :wink:

.540

Which to be fair is still below average (average this year is .559), but that would give him a TS+ of 97 (100 is average), which is an improvement from 93 last year.


That strikes me as really sad. You have to take this nested sample of games where he's done well and his TS% needs to improve by 2 or 5 percent or whatever to get to league average. Not good just league average.


With TS% it's tricky because some of those guys near the top are spot shooters, or dudes who get good looks. With RJ's usage, it's not too bad.
User avatar
Meat
Head Coach
Posts: 7,302
And1: 5,077
Joined: Jun 30, 2013
     

Re: RJ's Upside 

Post#220 » by Meat » Mon Feb 7, 2022 6:44 pm

do we even have an idea of rj's upside without a decent pg? i mean i hate fox on the knicks, but i **** hate the idea of another day of randle hampering rj's development.

Return to New York Knicks