D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Hardens a superstar? In what world?
In the NBA world. Sensational player.
Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts
D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Hardens a superstar? In what world?
Calinks wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:Calinks wrote:I'm giving Morey a standing ovation! Everyone said it was stupid, it couldn't be done. He has to trade Simmons in the summer, he has to trade Simmons before training camp, he has to trade Simmons before the season starts. He didn't have to do any of that. He played the long game and won. He wanted a superstar, he wanted to put the Sixers in the title picture while Embiid is in his prime.
It was a bold and great move to hold out, let the market change, and strike when he got his chance. Regardless of if this works out or not, I give him huge props for having the balls to hold out and get what he wanted as opposed to being pressured to act. He was in a situation where he could afford to wait and he won.
Except he clearly lost. He should now be fired.
If they win a championship, maybe even they come close, it's a win.

Baseline81 wrote:Calinks wrote:I'm giving Morey a standing ovation! Everyone said it was stupid, it couldn't be done. He has to trade Simmons in the summer, he has to trade Simmons before training camp, he has to trade Simmons before the season starts. He didn't have to do any of that. He played the long game and won. He wanted a superstar, he wanted to put the Sixers in the title picture while Embiid is in his prime.
It was a bold and great move to hold out, let the market change, and strike when he got his chance. Regardless of if this works out or not, I give him huge props for having the balls to hold out and get what he wanted as opposed to being pressured to act. He was in a situation where he could afford to wait and he won.
Didn't Morey state Simmons was worth an all-star and picks in exchange? And yet, he ended up dealing Simmons with picks, along with a pretty good player in Curry, for an all-star? To make matters worse, that all-star has basically given up on his past two teams in less than two years and will be making a significant chunk of change next season.
I'm not saying Morey wasn't right to wait, but this is no slam dunk either.
Baseline81 wrote:Calinks wrote:I'm giving Morey a standing ovation! Everyone said it was stupid, it couldn't be done. He has to trade Simmons in the summer, he has to trade Simmons before training camp, he has to trade Simmons before the season starts. He didn't have to do any of that. He played the long game and won. He wanted a superstar, he wanted to put the Sixers in the title picture while Embiid is in his prime.
It was a bold and great move to hold out, let the market change, and strike when he got his chance. Regardless of if this works out or not, I give him huge props for having the balls to hold out and get what he wanted as opposed to being pressured to act. He was in a situation where he could afford to wait and he won.
Didn't Morey state Simmons was worth an all-star and picks in exchange? And yet, he ended up dealing Simmons with picks, along with a pretty good player in Curry, for an all-star? To make matters worse, that all-star has basically given up on his past two teams in less than two years and will be making a significant chunk of change next season.
I'm not saying Morey wasn't right to wait, but this is no slam dunk either.

SO_MONEY wrote:Calinks wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:
Except he clearly lost. He should now be fired.
If they win a championship, maybe even they come close, it's a win.
Future results do not determine current value.
Calinks wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:Calinks wrote:
If they win a championship, maybe even they come close, it's a win.
Future results do not determine current value.
Here is why he won.
Morey wanted a star player to help Embiid win a title. Someone who could carry the offensive load. Someone who could score and shoot. He traded for one of the most elite scorers in NBA history. He got what he wanted. He didn't take back assets and other things he felt wouldn't help his team win a title right now. He got exactly what he wanted, he won. Someone winning doesn't mean someone has to lose, Brooklyn got a nice deal out of it too.
SO_MONEY wrote:Calinks wrote:SO_MONEY wrote:
Future results do not determine current value.
Here is why he won.
Morey wanted a star player to help Embiid win a title. Someone who could carry the offensive load. Someone who could score and shoot. He traded for one of the most elite scorers in NBA history. He got what he wanted. He didn't take back assets and other things he felt wouldn't help his team win a title right now. He got exactly what he wanted, he won. Someone winning doesn't mean someone has to lose, Brooklyn got a nice deal out of it too.
He should be fired for this.
KGdaBom wrote:D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Hardens a superstar? In what world?
In the NBA world. Sensational player.
D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:KGdaBom wrote:D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Hardens a superstar? In what world?
In the NBA world. Sensational player.
He’s a loser. Blew up 2 franchises in 3 years. Blew up the rockets with Chris Paul, annual 1 seed contenders to play with his loser buddy Russ. They sucked. So the rockets are strapped for picks they gave up to get Russ. Wants to play with his other cooler friend Kevin just 12.5 months ago because he started doing things his way in Houston. They grant him his wish and he can’t handle it in Brooklyn.
Yea. Sensational.
Slim Tubby wrote:I would advise Harden to avoid his "quitter/pouter" routine or Embiid will bury him under the Liberty Bell.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink wrote:I wanted to wait a bit before posting, to let the immediate gut reactions die down a bit. I find it amusing, but understandable, that people with very different views on the value of Simmons can point to the same transaction, and say, “See, I was right!” People that highly value Simmons are likely to highly value Harden - those that don’t think as much about Simmons probably don’t value Harden that much.
Let me start by saying that a Top 5 player is very valuable. Looking back at previous NBA champs, it’s very rare for a team to win a ring if they don’t have one. However, players like this see their value drive off a cliff once they decline, because of the huge salaries that last for multiple years. It does not take long for one of the best contracts in the NBA to become one of the worst, and all the worst contracts are star players that are no longer stars. Would anyone be thrilled if this deal was for Westbrook?
So the question is .. is Harden a Top 5 player? Does he win PHI a championship? I don’t think he is at this level any more. Giannis, Steph, Jokic, Durant, LeBron, and even Embiid are clearly better. Harden’s history in the playoffs - even when he was younger - has not been good. What is guaranteed though is the cost - both in salary and in trade value. Those are lost opportunity costs.
For me, If you win a ring, all is forgiven. That’s the overall goal for an NBA franchise. But this was an all-in move on a second banana, who’s game, salary and personality may end up hurting the Sixers.
Klomp wrote:Harden's value is not what it once was, but it is still very high. Same with Simmons. That's why they made such natural trade partners.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves