GBPackers47 wrote:Ayt wrote:GBPackers47 wrote:This should be studied as one of the greatest negotiations in sports history from the player/agent side.
Damn well played by Rodgers.
It turns out a back to back MVP has a lot of leverage. Who knew?
I mean if you ignore the fact that Rodgers started this negotiation before he even won the 1st one of the back-to-back then yeah, it’s painfully obvious.
But before that first MVP, every talking head and fan said Rodgers is done. It’s not time to move on just yet, but the end is near. The franchise then doubled down on that take by trading up for Love in the first round. Meanwhile, Rodgers is deadass saying “I’m not done” “I want to play into my 40s” “I want to retire a Packer.” At that time, from Rodgers perspective, those goals ALL happening are looking grim at best.
I say best in sports history because Rodgers HAD to win back-to-back MVPs for this entire thing to play out. He didn’t just sleepwalk into the last 2 seasons and happen to be the best player in the league. Everyone else didn’t collectively just get worse while he stayed the same.
A 38 year old quarterback just got paid $200 million, from the same GM that traded up for his replacement just 2 years ago, in a league where market altering deals are reserved for guys 10 years younger.
Rodgers now has everything he wants. Highest paid player in football. Playing into his 40s. And, most likely, retiring a Packer.
I say it should be studied because you see guys fail in negotiations every single year by “betting on themselves” (Dennis Schroeder being the most recent laughing stock of the sports world).
When you bet on yourself, you HAVE to deliver.
C'mon man, that is not even close to true. He had a down couple years sure. A couple injures, a stale McCarthy offense, and a first year in a new system all contributed. But there was nothing to suggest that his arm was any less than (like Peyton's at the end) or that his ability to extend plays with his legs, and pocket presence, had deteriorated. Really just an embarrassing miscalculation by management.