YourCellarDoor wrote:Gimli wrote:YourCellarDoor wrote:strong contender for the worst devin booker post i've read on any platform all year.
You can quote me back when Booker's jumpshooting won't work in the Finals and he will keep shooting them, which will result in his team's loss.
regardless of the eventual team outcome - it's just shallow, bad analysis that shows a lack of understanding of the sport.
Sure. There's been a million people say jumpshooting doesn't work, but when I say that specifically against Booker, it's "the worst devin booker post ever". It's pretty much the same thing. I mean look, the Bucks went on 4-0 to close the suns. Surely the suns had enough offense to win at least one game, right? Surely their team's best player should earn one win by himself?
But let's check his stats, since you're so willing to talk about stats...
28.1666666667 points per game
0.45% for 2
0.268 for 3....
Amazing, truly reliable jumpshooter...
If we check only the last 4 games...
1) 3/14 for 2... 1/7 for 3
2) 17/28 for 2... solid 0/3 for 3
3)17/33 for 2... solid 2/4 for 3
4) 8 / 22... 0/7 for 3...
Free throw shooting was satisfying, but you don't win playoffs on hitting a few free throws.
So, all in all, not good numbers for the last 4 games, right? I guess jumpshooting doesn't work, when you face a proper defense and proper attack. Which was the only time for the Suns last year, that it actually happened.
Now the burden of proof is back to you, to show I don't know, that Booker did the best against all odds against a mighty superteam with the conspiracy of the refs. Or try to find some other series against a similar level difficult opponent, when Booker just demolished the other team.
PS: if you come back to me with Doncic, I've got no idea what his % are, but the guy played against Kawhi + PG13 + Batum + Beverly + Mann + Morris... First find me a player that faced such defense, than we can talk stats. Which are often meaningless anyway.