Prokorov wrote:GTR11 wrote:TheNetsFan wrote:Division record does not factor in when it comes to ties that include teams in different divisions.
Head to head amongst the tied teams comes before Conference record. Charlotte would be 4-3, We're 3-3 & Atlanta is 3-4, so a 3 way tie would break in that order.
Boston would win a tiebreaker against Milwaukee, but I think it's unlikely that Milwaukee loses 1 and Boston wins @Memphis. Boston would also hold the tiebreaker over Philly, so for them to flip, Philly needs to win out (back to back at home vs Indy & Detroit) & Boston would need to lose @Memphis. It's more realistic for Philly to sneak up to #3 than Boston to get back to #2.
Three-Team Tiebreaker:
1. Division winner (this criterion is applied regardless of whether the tied teams are in the same division)
2. Best head-to-head winning percentage among all teams tied
3. Highest winning percentage within division (if teams are in the same division)
4. Highest winning percentage in conference games
5. Highest winning percentage against playoff teams in own conference
6. Highest point differential between points scored and points allowed
We hold tie breakers when all things compared. So if ATL/BK/Cha all tied up we be higher seeded.
I think you misinterpret #1
it isnt "best division record" its if you won the division or not. a division winner would have the tiebreaker over non-division winners. none of the teams in the play-in race won their divisions. so it starts with #2 for our scenario.
#3 states what TheNetsFan is saying... that division record doesnt apply since nets/haws/hornets are not all in the same division
Exactly. #1 means if the Central Division winner was tied with the 2nd best team in the Atlantic division, the Central Division winner wins the tiebreaker.



















