ogmagicfan wrote:Magic_Kingdom wrote:I’m always surprised how many fans still accept tanking when there are so few examples of it working. And again, Weltman has made and acquired multiple recent lottery picks already, all still on the roster, so why does anyone believe he just needs one more pick to turn things around?
That's a lie that's repeated for no reason. So many teams have been built through the draft. The Magic teams that both contended were built through #1 picks!
Frankly teams who get lucky and snag a #1 pick or atleast 1-3 pick expedite their developing process greatly. The reality is the Magic have been unlucky the past decade in the draft. After being fairly lucky in the draft the draft in the 1st 2 decades you could say it's law of averages in practice.
The Magic holding off from making a push for signing till next year gives us 2 chances (this & next) at a top 3 pick and gives current pieces another year to develop without competing with a star we could sign for the ball, giving them more time to develop, like the Suns (built through the draft) development time before getting Chris Paul.
"Building through the draft" and "tanking" are not synonymous. Tanking is an extreme form of *attempting* to build through the draft. Tanking means dumping all your good players and then holding out healthy players in an effort to intentionally lose to improve your draft lottery odds.
Golden State built their team through the draft but didn't tank. They got Steph at #7, Klay at #11, and Draymond in the second round.
Phoenix partially built through the draft but I don't think you could say they tanked. They got Booker at #13 and then were bad for 2 seasons before drafting Ayton at #1. Even with that, Ayton, their lottery prize, is the third-best player on their team.
Milwaukee built through the draft but didn't tank. They got Giannis at #15 and Middleton in the second round. They traded for Jrue Holdiay.
Toronto doesn't tank but drafts extremely well. They got Siakam late in the first round, VanVleet was undrafted, and after an injury-riddled season they picked fourth and took the Rookie of the Year, Scottie Barnes. Did the Raptors tank this season after getting the 4th pick, the way the Magic blatantly tanked after getting the 5th and 8th picks? No, they made the playoffs and gave the Sixers a scare in the first round. Do you think any Raptors fans would want to trade with us because they feel like they're on a treadmill after losing in the first round? Of course not.
Miami partially built through the draft but refused to tank. They got Adebayo at #14, Herro at #13, and traded for Jimmy Butler.
Even the Magic teams you cited aren't examples of tanking. The Magic team that drafted Shaq #1 was just bad and only three years old. And the Magic team that drafted Dwight #1 had T-Mac and Juwan Howard and was trying to win. They just sucked.
So again, I go back to my original point. There are very few examples of tanking being a successful team-building strategy. And I think part of the reason for that is that losing on purpose, or at the very least accepting losing, takes a psychological toll on your young building blocks. There is also, potentially, no end to tanking. What if the Magic get the sixth pick in this draft? Should they tank again next season? Just keep going until they get a top 2 pick? And if that pick is a bust, keep tanking?