eyeatoma wrote:Let's also talk about precedent. When was the last time that an NBA MVP, did worse record wise but still won the MVP? In a season where there was another candidate who had a better record, and hadn't won the MVP, did the media really have to go out of their way to say, OMG, for the love of humanity, Jokic needs to get a 2nd MVP. Seriously?
Lebron in 2010. Before than Nash in 2006. Nash in 2006 was a pretty similar situation to Jokic's this year - his team had a significantly worse record than last season but the voters took into account that Amar'e missed all but 3 games due to an injury and that Joe Johnson left in the summer.