Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 29,905
And1: 25,247
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone? 

Post#21 » by 70sFan » Fri May 13, 2022 4:39 pm

migya wrote:
70sFan wrote:
TrueLAfan wrote:He’s arguably in the set of players in that 7-14 group, more often placed 15-25. I’ve got him around #20. Great player.

I’ve said this several times in different threads. Moses was/is, in many ways, the greatest role player of all time. You couldn’t run an offense through him. He was not a great outlet passer. He rarely moved out of the key to double, or defend perimeter shooters (one reason why Jack Sikma was a super nemesis for Moses). He was a poor ballhandler and didn't have the greatest hands when it came to catching passes. But what he did was both simple and staggeringly effective. He was the ultimate garbage man. He was an amazing offensive rebounder and got a ton of points there. He often got fouled down there as well, resulting in lots and lots of free throws—and he was an excellent FT shooter for a big man. As long as he didn’t put the ball on the court often or much, he had a nice spin move and pretty good drop step down low (which drew more fouls)—and since he was down low all the time, it was that much more effective. I don’t buy the strength argument of Moses; I think Moses was simply relentless. As his motor wore down in the mid-80s, his value dropped—but he’d had a ton of great years before that. He cleaned the boards and got a ton of points on high efficiency and you didn't need to do a damn thing as a team for that to happen.

But it’s hard to build a team around a guy like that. Yes, Houston made a finals with Moses in the pivot—but Houston was, by and large, a mediocre, sometimes underperforming team. You had to build a team around Moses as opposed to with him. The Rockets never really got that. The Sixers were the ultimate team for him; they were a complete team when Moses got on board. Their outstanding team defense allowed Moses to stay down low; the peripheral ball movement and shooting made his cleanup job more efficient and easier. Like I said, he was the ultimate role player—and plenty valuable.

I think you underrate Moses self-creation ability a little bit here. I wouldn't agree that Moses was the garbage man, you can't score 30+ppg this way. I actually tracked a lot of Moses games last year and he scored around 6-7 ppg from putbacks, which is absurdly high but only around 25% of his total points.

You also sell his low post repertoire short - he had much more than just a dropstep. He mastered the fadeaway to the baseline, but he could make it from either shoulder. He could also attack you from faceup position and his handles weren't that horrible - he could beat your center off the dribble just fine.


One of the fastest Centers and took it to the basket nett than most star bigs. People need to watch games of him and they'll see how hard to stop he was.

I don't think he was one of the fastest, but he had very quick first step. Not Admiral-esque, but very deceptive. He had a decent enough jumpshot from midrange to make sagging defenders pay and when they start coming at him, he could beat them off the dribble. It was consistent patters against slower defenders like Eaton, older Gilmore or Donaldson. The ones he couldn't bully inside.

He had more in his game than just a bully ball and putbacks
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 14,946
And1: 11,452
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone? 

Post#22 » by Cavsfansince84 » Fri May 13, 2022 10:15 pm

70sFan wrote:I don't think he was one of the fastest, but he had very quick first step. Not Admiral-esque, but very deceptive. He had a decent enough jumpshot from midrange to make sagging defenders pay and when they start coming at him, he could beat them off the dribble. It was consistent patters against slower defenders like Eaton, older Gilmore or Donaldson. The ones he couldn't bully inside.

He had more in his game than just a bully ball and putbacks


Ya I'd say Moses had one of the goat mid range games for centers. Maybe up there with Reed, Kareem, Hakeem and a few others.
mdonnelly1989
Head Coach
Posts: 6,462
And1: 1,808
Joined: Aug 11, 2014
       

Re: Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone? 

Post#23 » by mdonnelly1989 » Sat May 14, 2022 1:42 am

70sFan wrote:
migya wrote:
70sFan wrote:Yeah, Moses was a great flopper. One of the best ever at that 8-)


He got hammered alot.

He did, but he also flopped a lot. Especially on the board, he loved going under defender, tanglng with him and exaggarating the contact to death. It's this veteran move he had even when he wasn't veteran and it was a nightmare for opponents because he could foul out entire frontcourts that way. He also flopped without the ball trying to etablish deep position down low.

Being very physical doesn't reject the possibility of flopping.


I would say directly in the middle between Patrick and David Robinson. David Robinson being about 15th and Ewing being about 30th so about 22nd or 23rd
euroleague
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,871
Joined: Mar 26, 2014
 

Re: Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone? 

Post#24 » by euroleague » Sat May 14, 2022 2:02 am

I could see him placed as high as 9th.

Wilt
Kareem
Shaq
MJ
Russell
Bird
Magic
LBJ

Just below those players. His 3 MVPs, elite playoff performances in his peak, dominance in an absolutely stacked era, historic offensive rebounding, etc... just depends how you value peak/offense vs longevity/defense.
asindc
Pro Prospect
Posts: 865
And1: 152
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: In front of the computer.

Re: Highest reasonable ranking for Moses Malone? 

Post#25 » by asindc » Sat May 14, 2022 2:41 am

migya wrote:A video on Moses Malone



That’s a really good video on Moses’ career and provides a lot of good perspective for those not familiar with his game.
Though Dr. J, Darnell Hillman, and Artis Gilmore's fros got most of the attention, George C. Trapp's fro should be noted for its bouncy qualities.

Return to Player Comparisons