ImageImageImageImageImage

College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,537
And1: 61,438
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1881 » by DOT » Sat May 14, 2022 3:38 pm

RHODEY wrote:
2010 wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Complainers & whiners gonna be punching the air when this kid pans out if we didn’t pick him.

His game as described sounds eerily similar to IQ's....

People say that, but I don't think that's really true

Like, they have some similar weaknesses, like how they both struggle to get to and finish at the rim, but in terms of strengths, TyTy's biggest strength is his ability to pull up from mid, which Quick just doesn't have, and Quick has the pull up from 3 which TyTy, at least last year, doesn't have

He's more comparable to a smaller Dejounte Murray than Quick.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,732
And1: 43,306
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1882 » by TheGreenArrow » Sat May 14, 2022 4:41 pm

Read on Twitter


Yeah they must have deals lined up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully it’s for Burks and Fournier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,105
And1: 96,062
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1883 » by thebuzzardman » Sat May 14, 2022 4:54 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Yeah they must have deals lined up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully it’s for Burks and Fournier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Or RJ and/or IQ
Image
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,843
And1: 8,101
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1884 » by WargamesX » Sat May 14, 2022 5:34 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Yeah they must have deals lined up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully it’s for Burks and Fournier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Or RJ and/or IQ


You’re reading into it too deeply. This draft lacks any real PG prospects, and both youth and talent wise the Knicks are good at PF and Center.

Randle/Obi
Mitch/Sim

Could potentially fill those spots for 3-5 years.

Looking at the wing over the next 3-5 year you only have Grimes, RJ, and Cam…. maybe IQ but I still think they are grooming him for PG. So if they want to make a draft investment a wing would be the move.

Then looking at the draft 11-12 odds are the BPA will be a wing.

One of Sochan, Dieng, Dyson, Davis, and Mathurin, maybe Brown or Eason will be the draft target. Most of them will be there when the Knicks draft.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,105
And1: 96,062
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1885 » by thebuzzardman » Sat May 14, 2022 5:46 pm

WargamesX wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter


Yeah they must have deals lined up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopefully it’s for Burks and Fournier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Or RJ and/or IQ


You’re reading into it too deeply. This draft lacks any real PG prospects, and both youth and talent wise the Knicks are good at PF and Center.

Randle/Obi
Mitch/Sim

Could potentially fill those spots for 3-5 years.

Looking at the wing over the next 3-5 year you only have Grimes, RJ, and Cam…. maybe IQ but I still think they are grooming him for PG. So if they want to make a draft investment a wing would be the move.

Then looking at the draft 11-12 odds are the BPA will be a wing.

One of Sochan, Dieng, Dyson, Davis, and Mathurin, maybe Brown or Eason will be the draft target. Most of them will be there when the Knicks draft.


Knicks aren't bringing Mitch back. That's been obvious for at least 2 years.
Image
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,278
And1: 22,786
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1886 » by RHODEY » Sat May 14, 2022 6:16 pm

DOT wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
2010 wrote:
Complainers & whiners gonna be punching the air when this kid pans out if we didn’t pick him.

His game as described sounds eerily similar to IQ's....

People say that, but I don't think that's really true

Like, they have some similar weaknesses, like how they both struggle to get to and finish at the rim, but in terms of strengths, TyTy's biggest strength is his ability to pull up from mid, which Quick just doesn't have, and Quick has the pull up from 3 which TyTy, at least last year, doesn't have

He's more comparable to a smaller Dejounte Murray than Quick.


Interesting....but does Dejounte have the same weakness? Struggling to get to and finish at the rim?
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,278
And1: 22,786
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1887 » by RHODEY » Sat May 14, 2022 6:17 pm

DaGawd wrote:
2010 wrote:
RHODEY wrote:Yes he definitely intrigues me...


I think you can get away with playing Sochan as a small-ball 5. That could really open things up allowing this team to feature a more modernized approach to the offense.

Yeah but thibs


Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 38,815
And1: 51,828
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1888 » by DaGawd » Sat May 14, 2022 6:52 pm

RHODEY wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
2010 wrote:
I think you can get away with playing Sochan as a small-ball 5. That could really open things up allowing this team to feature a more modernized approach to the offense.

Yeah but thibs


Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.

I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times
BaF
Washington Wizards
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,278
And1: 22,786
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1889 » by RHODEY » Sat May 14, 2022 7:02 pm

DaGawd wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
DaGawd wrote:Yeah but thibs


Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.

I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times


Oh yeah, I hear you on that...But I hope Thibs will be under more pressure to adapt next season.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,278
And1: 22,786
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1890 » by RHODEY » Sat May 14, 2022 8:09 pm

Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 3,121
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1891 » by Nazrmohamed » Sat May 14, 2022 8:32 pm

HighRyzer83 wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:For me it's Dyson Daniels and then Sochan in that order. Mathurin is too much like reddish and smaller.

Daniels might be the best defender in this draft and also has legit size and PG skills.


He can't shoot though but I could still draft him on the other skills, especially if he's really 6'7-6'8

Thats what they said about LaMelo too. But if Daniels shot well we would have no shot at 11



True that. And people are taking notice. Some mocks have him now going ahead of our pick.
Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 3,121
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1892 » by Nazrmohamed » Sat May 14, 2022 8:41 pm

DaGawd wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
DaGawd wrote:Yeah but thibs


Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.

I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times



I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,278
And1: 22,786
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1893 » by RHODEY » Sat May 14, 2022 9:09 pm

Nazrmohamed wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.

I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times



I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.


Me too but Mitch is likely a goner. So we need to plan post Mitch. As far as Taj blocking Obi...well I guess you can see it that way., but Randle needs to go period.
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,577
And1: 6,474
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1894 » by 8516knicks » Sat May 14, 2022 9:09 pm

Nazrmohamed wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Thing is he seems very much like a Thibs type player....other than the fact that he'd be a rook.

I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times



I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.


We have FOUR non-shooting centers! How about stretch 4 or 5 (or both)>>??> :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Jeffrey
General Manager
Posts: 8,592
And1: 6,284
Joined: Aug 02, 2010
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1895 » by Jeffrey » Sun May 15, 2022 1:47 am

RHODEY wrote:
2010 wrote:I wouldn’t be mad at Sochan.

Yes he definitely intrigues me...


Based on The Ringer's draft guide, he is currently ranked 8th.

So let me get this straight. Great defender, ball-handler but limited offense. This sounds like someone we drafted a few years ago?!

https://nbadraft.theringer.com/
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,105
And1: 96,062
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1896 » by thebuzzardman » Sun May 15, 2022 2:05 am

Jeffrey wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
2010 wrote:I wouldn’t be mad at Sochan.

Yes he definitely intrigues me...


Based on The Ringer's draft guide, he is currently ranked 8th.

So let me get this straight. Great defender, ball-handler but limited offense. This sounds like someone we drafted a few years ago?!

https://nbadraft.theringer.com/

Lance Thomas? :D
Image
nyk2017
Pro Prospect
Posts: 898
And1: 819
Joined: Jul 19, 2017
 

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1897 » by nyk2017 » Sun May 15, 2022 2:08 am

Jeffrey wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
2010 wrote:I wouldn’t be mad at Sochan.

Yes he definitely intrigues me...


Based on The Ringer's draft guide, he is currently ranked 8th.

So let me get this straight. Great defender, ball-handler but limited offense. This sounds like someone we drafted a few years ago?!

https://nbadraft.theringer.com/


They compared Paolo Banchero to Julius Randle... Yikes!!!
They also compared Tyty to Quickley
Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 3,121
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1898 » by Nazrmohamed » Sun May 15, 2022 2:14 am

8516knicks wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
DaGawd wrote:I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times



I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.


We have FOUR non-shooting centers! How about stretch 4 or 5 (or both)>>??> :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:



Nah but that's exactly what I'm saying. Mitch plays 25 minutes. That's one minute less than half the game. There's plenty of time beyond that to play a stretch 5 or 4 and you could accomplish that with Randle and Toppin. We ALWAYS COULDVE accomplished that with Randle and Toppin....playing together that is. It's just that Thibs don't gaf what you like or don't like or playing this modern day lineup. In fact he already probably feels he's playing small as 10 yrs ago Taj was a PF, so take that haters ( I'm just imagining how he feels). But still, we don't have to get rid of Mitch or Randle to accomplish your small ball, stretch options. You just gotta change the rotation.

But in any case there are guys we could pick up for that role. We actually had Bobby Portis and let him go just before Thibs got here. Nobody here appreciated Bobby
Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 3,121
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1899 » by Nazrmohamed » Sun May 15, 2022 2:19 am

RHODEY wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
DaGawd wrote:I’m speaking on the point 2010 made about playing him as a small ball 5 and running a more modern style of play. He might fit that mold but it’s up to Thibs to get with the times and stop insisting on always having that rim protector/rim runner archetype man the 5 at all times



I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.


Me too but Mitch is likely a goner. So we need to plan post Mitch. As far as Taj blocking Obi...well I guess you can see it that way., but Randle needs to go period.


Can't argue with that. I hope we can work things out with Mitch but am prepared to not get my wish and I'm fine trading Randle. I'm just saying there's more than one way to skin a cat and they shouldn't have ever been the reason Obi didn't play. Obi didn't play because Thibs didn't want him to play. It's as simple as that.

Also Obi just wasn't good. I know everybody high on that last 5 games but most this board thought he was a bust outside those 5 games. It was fun though and I was happy for him.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,188
And1: 57,741
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45 

Post#1900 » by robillionaire » Sun May 15, 2022 2:32 am

Nazrmohamed wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:

I like having a rim protecting 5. And I think as things get trendy we're sort of underappreciating the one we got. HOWEVER.....even now we could've always chosen not to go with Taj Gibson or Noel as the backup. We can both get what we want. Nobody is stopping Thibs from having his rim protector as the base of what he likes to do but sub in a small ball 5 regularly. What's stopping us from even now playing Randle at the 5 when Mitch needs rest, thus opening up additional minutes for Obi. There's your skilled C right there. There's your small ball right there.

We play big, then play big in the second unit, then play big in the 3rd unit. So then naturally you lash out against your starter who I'll remind everyone only plays 25minutes as a starter. And I'm sortve arguing 2 points with one stone here.
-solving for how I get a smaller, more offensively skilled and faster offense on the floor
-solving for more minutes for Obi.

I know this started by talking about Sochan but who knows if we'll take him. Could be Daniels. But rather than focus so much on how Mitch don't fit into the modern league or how Randle is blocking Obi, focus on why we got two backup C's making 20mil between them blocking all the minutes. Obis being blocked by a 37yr old most nights, not Julius.


Me too but Mitch is likely a goner. So we need to plan post Mitch. As far as Taj blocking Obi...well I guess you can see it that way., but Randle needs to go period.


Can't argue with that. I hope we can work things out with Mitch but am prepared to not get my wish and I'm fine trading Randle. I'm just saying there's more than one way to skin a cat and they shouldn't have ever been the reason Obi didn't play. Obi didn't play because Thibs didn't want him to play. It's as simple as that.

Also Obi just wasn't good. I know everybody high on that last 5 games but most this board thought he was a bust outside those 5 games. It was fun though and I was happy for him.


And if we are being honest those last 5 games were glorified summer league games, and he was good in the summer league. We know he can play well against weak competition but he still has a lot to prove. IQ was looking like a hall of fame bound PG in those games too

Return to New York Knicks